Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Neo-Conservatives are not Conservatives
Sierra Times ^ | August 12, 2002 | Jeff Adams

Posted on 08/12/2002 5:48:59 AM PDT by sauropod

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-217 next last
To: sauropod
They've ruined that word. I am a Traditionalist.

A Traditionalist fraud, perhaps. We don't allow moral-liberals to define conservatism for us.

41 posted on 08/12/2002 7:41:36 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve50
you don't hear the neocon label on the idiot box much anymore.

I plan on doing my part in reviving the label and making it stick to these anti-liberty, anti-South bigots.

42 posted on 08/12/2002 7:42:30 AM PDT by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: general_re
I think so much is hot air from them.They aren't constructive, postive people, so they TALK a good game.Ever seen a pessimist actually accomplish anything? It's easier to proclaim "failure" before you start than actually be proven to be one ;-)
43 posted on 08/12/2002 7:43:26 AM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
moral-liberals

What is a moral-libral?

44 posted on 08/12/2002 7:48:44 AM PDT by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: billbears
44 posts and the usual neo-cons/leftists have not shown up. Is there a communist cell meeting this morning?
45 posted on 08/12/2002 7:50:35 AM PDT by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
The ideological purists always complain that the pragmatic realists are selling out. Live with me in New York for a while - or Ontario, for that matter - and you soon come to appreciate the virtues of "better than nothing".... ;)
46 posted on 08/12/2002 7:52:46 AM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger
"Ah, gee. Let people do whatsoever they want to. It's all nobody's business what consenting adults do. It's all relative. We can't be judgmental about anything. Let's all just live and let die. People have no intrinsic and inestimable worth and value. People can all go to hell in a handbasket for all I care. I am most compassionate!"
47 posted on 08/12/2002 7:53:14 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger
LOL, well not the usual however I think it'd be safe to say I've been attacked more than once for 'gasp' wanting to be truly conservative. I think the author of the article has it dead on. Republicans of today have become some sort of big government nice guys. As long as 'our' side is in power, devil be d#mned if you speak out against them. What I find truly ironic is that if a Democrat were doing the exact same things, the outrage from any Republican would be heard for miles.
48 posted on 08/12/2002 7:54:00 AM PDT by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
If you keep the party going, how come there aren't more of you? Where is that State legislature composed of "true" conservatives that will galvanize so many of you to take it national? Your whole post was an endorsement of staying on the fringe, yet you can't see the irony in it.Another classic sign of a fringe dweller;plus the inevitable "not a dime's worth of difference between the Republicans and Democrats" mantra which is trotted out ad nauseum to fortify your delusions.Yeah, that's not fringe thinking, is it?

Careful, every political movement worth noting throughout history was instigated by an element that can be described as "fringe".

49 posted on 08/12/2002 8:01:54 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
I'm a free-thinker who views issues through the lenses of free (fair) trade, deregulation, tremendously less taxation, overwhelmingly strong defense, and liberty. How to attain these are up for debate to me, but apparently not for others. To them, it's their way or the highway.

Very nicely put

50 posted on 08/12/2002 8:02:11 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
The Neo-Traditionalists have gotten more vocal of late and I seem to miss anything constructive, positive, or realistic in the rhetoric, so far. But I'm listening.
51 posted on 08/12/2002 8:09:40 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
plus the inevitable "not a dime's worth of difference between the Republicans and Democrats" mantra which is trotted out ad nauseum to fortify your delusions.

If you can honestly point to me a difference that I can stand on, believe in, just within the campaign here in NC between Elizabeth Dole and Erskine Bowles, I would consider your argument. However they are both the same shade. Both talking about national healthcare, both for tariffs, both at some level pro-choice, both anti-gun, and both big government. Yet the true conservatives are called 'fringe' because they believe in the Constitution and hold mainly conservative views. They also won't be able to pick up the vote after the RNC (which made the choice sometime back in Feb. and we haven't even had our primaries yet!!) has dumped every bit of money behind Giddy because of her name recognition.

This is just one example but it is becoming more prevalent in the political world

52 posted on 08/12/2002 8:10:06 AM PDT by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: general_re
I lived under a "true" socialist government from 1991 to 1995.The real, Euro kind of traditional socialist apparatus, and it was a misery,so i know a little thing about what a socialist is and isn't.When the Paleo goes off tarring those to the left of them as socialists,but well to the right of Ralph Nader, well, I say gimme some of that socialism!!
53 posted on 08/12/2002 8:12:04 AM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
"Ah, gee. Let people do whatsoever they want to. It's all nobody's business what consenting adults do. It's all relative. We can't be judgmental about anything. Let's all just live and let die. People have no intrinsic and inestimable worth and value. People can all go to hell in a handbasket for all I care. I am most compassionate!"

The morality of socialism: The individual is too valuable to be trusted to look after himself.

54 posted on 08/12/2002 8:12:51 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Yup, that movement began under National Review, on through to Goldwater, and culminated in Reagan.So, are the paleos saying their day is but upon us all?
55 posted on 08/12/2002 8:14:15 AM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
Maybe it's Neo, as in New, as in New World Order, as in One World, as in creating the UN and spearheading UN opposition, as in playing both ends against the middle.
56 posted on 08/12/2002 8:14:34 AM PDT by apochromat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimer
Than again, it could be Neo as in a New tank of gas for a New car.
57 posted on 08/12/2002 8:17:44 AM PDT by apochromat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Jimer
My last post was intended to reply to post #1.
58 posted on 08/12/2002 8:19:00 AM PDT by apochromat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: 4ConservativeJustices
I would rather "throw my vote away" on an independent or third-party candidate and sleep well at night because I didn't contribute to the continuing downfall of our lost republic by voting for a neo-conservative/socialist, than choose "the lesser of two evils" and know that I voted into office someone who was going to go for my wallet and stab me in the back as if he were a common street mugger.

Well see I say that and get attacked for apparently having principles. From the responses I've seen of late, it just strengthens my belief that the only way to return to what the Founders had in mind would be to abolish the 17th Amendment. The voters have seen they can vote themselves money, among other things, from the public treasury and the general government. At this rate I truly feel we are at Tyler's 'apathy to dependency' point with only bondage left to go

59 posted on 08/12/2002 8:19:27 AM PDT by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger
I plan on doing my part in reviving the label and making it stick to these anti-liberty, anti-South bigots.

Did you actually type "South" and "bigot" in the same sentence with a straight face?

60 posted on 08/12/2002 8:20:36 AM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-217 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson