Posted on 08/11/2002 3:59:04 PM PDT by vannrox
Why?
Why?
It seems pretty obvious to me. If two species branched off at point 'A' then they would have the same number of mutations at that point from the ancestor - in all genes. The number of mutations at a particular point would be different for different genes of course since some seem to mutate more than others and some are much larger than others, but whichever one you picked had to have the same number of mutations just before the branching off. The kangaroo/platypus study shows that different genes give different branching off points which would be impossible if the species had truly descended from a common ancestor at some point. The fact that evolutionists have to pick and choose what gene or genes to use for their clock under different circumstances shows quite well the phoniness of evolution 'science'. It is such 'proofs' that thoroughly discredit evolution as a science.
Why, thank you! ;)
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
The only time I am ever tempted to believe in evolution is when I see the insult hurling done by the evolution adherents - reminds me so much of feces flinging monkeys... Actually, some people may take their next birth as monkeys, kind of evolution gone backwards.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.