Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Armey Urges End to Cuba Sanctions
Los Angeles Times ^ | 08/09/02 | Paul Richter

Posted on 08/09/2002 8:18:59 AM PDT by RFH

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-155 next last
To: William Wallace
A+!
61 posted on 08/09/2002 11:20:02 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: oldvike
IMO, the quickest way to destroy that Cuban communist regime is to import capitalism.

Various forms of capitalism have been imported to Cuba for decades via Canda, Europe, etc., none of which has a trade imbargo against Cuba. So, your theory doesn't hold water.

62 posted on 08/09/2002 11:23:31 AM PDT by Olydawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Russ
"I think he wants his 15 minutes of notoriety before he heads off into oblivion."

Let's hope so.

63 posted on 08/09/2002 11:24:46 AM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: oldvike
"IMO, the quickest way to destroy that Cuban Chinese communist regime is to import capitalism."

That was Nixon's theory (and that Dick is dead already), how's it working out so far?

64 posted on 08/09/2002 11:26:40 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Why do you think that hasn't happened already in light of the fact that Fidel trades with the majority of the world already?

Because the rest of the world is a pimple compared to the U.S. Not to sound boastful...well, okay to sound boastful, the U.S. is the big enchilada.

65 posted on 08/09/2002 11:26:57 AM PDT by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: SupplySider

66 posted on 08/09/2002 11:27:37 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: one_particular_harbour; xsmommy
Totally out of context, but it just seems to somehow fit here.

Two potatos are hanging around a street corner at night, how can you tell which one of the two is a prostitute?

67 posted on 08/09/2002 11:28:50 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Your right, we have spent all this time trying to get this tin pot dictator on the ropes, now that he's on the ropes, idiots like Armey want to save him. I'm thinking his acorn, Scott, didn't fall far from the tree. Why should I vote for him to replace his dad?
68 posted on 08/09/2002 11:30:24 AM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

Comment #69 Removed by Moderator

To: Wm Bach
You just got the buzzer on that.

It's because he only allows that trade which benefits himself, and strenghtens his ability to maintain power.

For those of you who claim that US policy towards Cuba has failed, I'd like to point out that maintaining Cuba afloat had a great deal to do with bankrupting the USSR.

Failed policy?

Hardly.
70 posted on 08/09/2002 11:31:54 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

Comment #71 Removed by Moderator

To: MotherSpector
WE SHOULD NEVER DEAL WITH COMMUNISTS.

Wrong. American trade and culture can do more to destroy communism than isolation.

China is a far more dangerous country...the Cuba embargo is arbitrary, silly, and above all political.
72 posted on 08/09/2002 11:33:01 AM PDT by Belial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Belial
Two wrongs make a right?
73 posted on 08/09/2002 11:33:44 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: one_particular_harbour
"I give up."

The one that says IDAHO..........

74 posted on 08/09/2002 11:36:38 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Tiny Cuba is not the USSR. Fidel is an old man. Old men
become like women as they age - more emotional. His ego
is the chink in his armor. Appeal to his ego, he can take
credit for Cuba's sudden change of good fortune even as
he losses grip on her.
75 posted on 08/09/2002 11:37:02 AM PDT by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy
THIS is the question that those that favor lifting the embargo are NEVER able to satisfactorily answer. THIS proves up the fallacy of that argument.

Exactly. Also, why do they think lifting the embargo would take away Castro's excuses? Before Castro, U.S. companies did lots of business with Cuba and Castro said companies like United Fruit were "exploiting" them. Using Castro "logic", with the embargo in place, we're exploiting them by not exploiting them.

Another point the embargo-enders refuse to discuss is why the U.S. imposed the embargo in the first place. The embargo was put in place because Castro stole hundreds of millions of dollars worth of U.S. properties on the island. Here's a novel concept: first have the thief return the stolen property and then we consider lifting the embargo.

76 posted on 08/09/2002 11:40:54 AM PDT by William Wallace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: RFH
Are we bombing Cuba??
77 posted on 08/09/2002 11:44:05 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
"Are we bombing Cuba??

Now, there's an idea!

We could start a rumour that bin Laden his hiding there!

78 posted on 08/09/2002 11:47:46 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Wm Bach
"Because the rest of the world is a pimple compared to the U.S."

Individually perhaps, but not collectively.

79 posted on 08/09/2002 11:48:57 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Wm Bach
Representative Sheila Jackson Lee
403 Cannon House Bldg.
Washington, D.C. 20515
Tx18@mail.house.gov.

July 31, 2002

Dear Representative Jackson Lee:

I am writing this letter with a heavy heart after seeing you in CSPAN defending the permanency in this hemisphere of a tyrant and a terrorist instead of the interest of your constituency and, above all, undermining the security of the United States.

It was a disgraceful spectacle witnessing American representatives and senators of both parties allowing the use the American taxpayers’ money to finance Cuba’s repressive apparatus and Castro’s international terrorism network.

All of you have shown extraordinary naiveté in thinking that business and tourists’ contacts with Castro’s regime would transform the brutal tyrant into a peaceful and benevolent leader. Over 150 nations around the world have been dealing with Castro for 43 years without achieving any change in the Stalinist economic and repressive model chosen by Castro. What makes you think that the American tourists and businessmen’s mere contract with them will infest the Cuban leaders with the virus of freedom and democracy?

In order to deal with Castro you have to overlook the fact that Castro is a cold-blooded murderer who approved the death by firing squad of each one of tens of thousands Cubans put to death by his direct orders, including some Americans, whose crime was opposing his reign of terror. You have been insensitive to the more than 500,000 thousand political prisoners, men, women and even children of every race and creed who were tortured in his dungeons, and over thirty thousand who died trying to cross the Florida straits in fragile makeshift rafts in their pursuit of freedom in what might be recognized as an unprecedented mass suicide. Still now, after 43 years, there are hundreds of prisoners of conscience whose human rights are being violated every day in Castro’s dungeons. Add to this horrific picture, the more than 2 million Cubans that were forced into political exile from a population of 7 million.

I also realize that what happened to these unfortunate people had no bearing on your conscience. But, this is the same dictator who tried to nuke our cities during the Missile Crisis and whose henchmen brutally tortured our POWs in Vietnam. I expected that as representatives of the American people, regardless of any other considerations, you must have been concerned that Castro’s Cuba is the main haven and sponsor of terrorism in this hemisphere and those politicians and business people, in dealing with Castro, are aiding and abetting terrorism. The Iranian terrorists who bombed an Argentinean Jewish Center in Buenos Aires in 1994 were trained and had their base of operations in Cuba.

Recently, British intelligence exposed Castro’s relationship with the IRA, the Colombian guerrillas, the Spanish Basque and Chilean terrorists, provoking a strong protest to the Cuban regime by the Chilean socialist administration. In fact, IRA terrorists based in Cuba were introducing more devastating techniques in the use of explosives for urban attacks in Colombia. Just this month was revealed that the most wanted Greek terrorist was detained after almost three decades in hiding and how he was trained in Castro’s Cuba. He was responsible for numerous terrorist attacks throughout Europe. Carlos “The Chacal”, the son of a Venezuelan Communist millionaire and the most famous and murderous of the terrorists in the 70’s was also trained in Cuba and is serving a long prison sentence in France. Castro’s Cuba has been the headquarters for the coordination of activities of over one hundred international terrorist organizations.

With President Chavez, a Castro’s subrogate in power in Venezuela, cooperating with Cuba’s terrorist designs, the U.S. is confronting the worst menace since Castro’s puppets in Central American were defeated in the 1980’s. Venezuela is one of our main providers of oil. To secure another source of oil, in case Chavez stops the flow of oil to our country, our government just provided $90 million dollars to reinforce the protection of the Colombian oil pipelines, which are under constant attacks by the Castro’s supported Marxist guerillas.

A few weeks ago, six pilots working in the U.S. with Venezuelan passports and who were flying airplanes with different American companies were detained. An informant alerted the American authorities that they had sophisticated false credentials that allowed them to bypass all security checks while going in and out of our airports. Was this grave security break another undercover operation of the Cuban terrorist network? Tens of thousands of terrorists were trained in Cuba by Castro, as far back as 1962, his camps were taking in 1,500 Latin American guerrillas a year. “Any revolutionary movement anywhere in the world can count on Cuba’s unconditional support,” declared Castro at the 1966 Tricontinental Conference in Havana where the international terrorism network was consolidated under Castro’s leadership.

We have in this hemisphere another “axis of evil” in the troika Castro/Chavez/ Colombian guerrillas and you are pursuing the normalization of commercial relations with a terrorist Stalinist regime that has state of the art biological, chemical and cyber warfare capabilities, and the will to use it against us. As a matter of fact, Cuba has more than 3,000 biological and chemical warfare researchers trained in the Soviet Union and East Germany who has been working in tandem with Iraq and Iran in the development of biological and chemical weapons of mass destruction. Last week Castro sent a personal envoy to Iraq in order to reiterate Cuba’s support of that terrorist state in case of an American attack.

We should keep in mind that in May 2001, Castro visited the main centers of terrorism in the Middle East, Iraq, Libya, and Iran, reinforcing his ties with the “Axis of Evil.” Castro sold to Iran one of his biological research laboratories as part of their cooperation in the production of biological weapons. Iran has well-developed facilities in their own country, why do they need one 90 miles from U.S.?

Was Castro also giving the necessary intelligence information to the Al Qaeda terrorists that made the successful attacks of September 11th possible? The Russians have a spy base in Cuba that is their main source of intelligence. During his visit to Cuba In August 2001, Russian President Vladimir Putin, accompanied by Fidel Castro, visited the Lourdes spy center. At a meeting with center specialists, Putin noted that their work is very much needed, "not only by the military, but also by the political leadership of the country." Putin said at a press conference in Havana that both Russia and Cuba are currently interested in continuing the operations of the Lourdes base. According to Putin, this center serves the interests of the Russian military and also provides some information obtained for appropriate Cuban government agencies. Such information might have been also very valuable for Al Qaeda and the terrorist network.

As part of the conditions set in 1968 by the former Soviet Union in order to supply Cuba with unlimited free weapons and an additional 6 billion dollars annually in economic subsidies, Castro allowed the Soviets direct intervention in Cuba’s economic, military and intelligence apparatus. Soviet Colonel Viktor Simenov of the KGB took direct supervising control of the DGI, Cuban Intelligence Services. All the DGI’s operational decisions, and its annual budget, had to be cleared through Colonel Simenov. Anything Cuba did in aid to worldwide terrorism after that would have to be done with the Russians’ knowledge and consent, under their close supervision if not their express command.

Evidently the Russian intelligence new quite well Castro’s involvement with Al_Qaeda and every other kind of international terrorism for the last 4 decades. Why did the Russians decide to close their spy base in Cuba immediately after the attack without even consulting with the Cuban regime? After several postponements, and in spite of Castro’s public tantrums and opposition, the base was dismantled. Were the Russians trying to disassociate themselves from Castro and the Al Qaeda partnership? Nevertheless, even though the equipment should have been returned to Russia in December of 2001, so far Castro has not allowed it to happen and is negotiating to give the former Russian base to the Chinese.

During one of those pilgrimages to Cuba that have become fashionable among American politicians, Senator Specter recognized the extraordinary intelligence capabilities of the Cuban regimen, a service that rivals the Mossad and the CIA. In one instance, the Pentagon’s most trusted analyst in charge of evaluating Castro’s menace to the U.S. was found to be a mole working for the Cuban intelligence. Are we going to put our security in the hands of one of our worst enemies?

Nevertheless, some American legislators went so far as to ask that the American taxpayers provide Cuba with state of the art radar under the pretense that Castro, whose main source of personal income is drug trafficking, would cooperate with us in the interdiction of drugs coming into the U.S. That is absolutely insane. In fact, this will further facilitate the importation of drugs into the U.S. and enable him to easily fulfill his dream of obliterating our country.

It is unconscionable that you are advocating a policy of abject appeasement toward Fidel Castro’s regime, while undermining President’s Bush war against terrorism. You are advocating relations with a terrorist state whose leader pledged on May 2001 at the University of Tehran, that their alliance would bring U.S. down to its knees. This was an ominous threat that came to fruition on September 11 with the brutal terrorist attacks to our country. Was Castro aware of the attack? Was he part of the planning? Russian Prime Minister Putin’s reaction after the attack attests to that possibility.

In a recent visit to Cuba, Rep. Diane Watson, attacking the U.S. bipartisan policy toward Cuba for more than four decades, arrogantly affirmed: "That might be the executive branch's view, but that is not the legislative branch's view, and we make the policy…More and more lawmakers are coming here by themselves, seeing for themselves, developing good will." I always thought that, according to our Constitution, the President was in charge of U.S. foreign policy.

Secretary of State Collin Powell reiterated Castro’s menace to this country and exhorted you to support President Bush’s war against terrorism. You and your colleagues in the U.S. Congress are single handedly removing from the terrorist list of the Sate Department a regime that has been one of the main sponsors of terrorism in the world for 43years, abrogating upon themselves the duties of the Secretary of State and of the President of United States by deciding our foreign policy and undermining our war against terrorism.

Although Castro, with a personal fortune of over 1.5 billion dollars is among the richest chief of state in the world according to Forbes magazine, Cuba, nevertheless, has defaulted on all its international debts. But, thanks to the irresponsibility of legislators such as yourself, the American taxpayers are going to finance Castro’s purchases and Cuba will buy a billion dollars worth of American food each year while the American workers foot the bill. Lenin affirmed that we would be the ones selling the rope to the communists in order for them to hang us. These American legislators go much further; they want to provide the rope free of charge to Castro and should be ashamed of themselves.

Jesus J. Chao





80 posted on 08/09/2002 11:56:25 AM PDT by Dqban22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-155 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson