|
This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
|
Locked on 07/31/2002 9:13:43 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Flame war
|
Skip to comments.
FEDERAL COURT IN LOS ANGELES GIVES GREEN LIGHT TO CIVIL RIGHTS LAWSUIT
Judicial Watch ^
| July 30, 2002
Posted on 07/30/2002 11:17:09 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 301-310 next last
To: Iwo Jima
You know that you have always been Daddy's little princess. Just don't tell the rest of them.Thanks, Dad!
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Good grief. Warn a person, won't you?
222
posted on
07/31/2002 3:57:33 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
Tort reform..... the girl wouldn't like tort reform simply because President Bush is or would be for it. Those plaintiff attorneys contribute many dollars to candidates in state goverenments and the conservatives wonder why they can't get elected.
223
posted on
07/31/2002 4:01:55 PM PDT
by
deport
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Why does every thread involving JW turn into a Klayman debate? We've been over it a hundred times! Its BORING!
To: Howlin
Good grief. Warn a person, won't you?LOL! Got something against cows? ;)
To: subterfuge
Why does every thread involving JW turn into a Klayman debate?Are you serious?
To: subterfuge
Why does every thread involving JW turn into a Klayman debate? Perhaps it's because Judicial Watch uses this forum like its own private advertising site, posting dubious "press releases," no doubt written by Klayman and his cronies.
From what I can gather, we're suppose to accept them at face value as God's own truth.
Apparently it bothers some of the Klaymanites when some of us spot distortions in them.
Besides, we hated spin during the Clinton years, remember? This is pure T spin. There is no difference between Klayman and Clinton: they both want to "do their thing" and have somebody else pay for it. And neither of them accomplish anything.
227
posted on
07/31/2002 4:40:34 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: subterfuge
What do you expect? Larry's a boring guy.
You can't make a silk purse out of a sows ear now can ya?
228
posted on
07/31/2002 4:46:26 PM PDT
by
terilyn
To: deport
"Tort reform..... the girl wouldn't like tort reform simply because President Bush is or would be for it." And of course, Larry would be against it. (for obvious reasons).
Face it, if Larry decided it was a good idea for everybody to wear their pants backwards, "the girl" would come up with some rationalization as to why Larry was right.
229
posted on
07/31/2002 4:51:56 PM PDT
by
terilyn
To: terilyn
You can't make a silk purse out of a sows ear now can ya?
Well, people who are 20 and still in college and know it all still gotta try.
To: terilyn
What do you expect? Larry's a boring guy.I thought I read here somewhere that he was sexy, exciting, and powerful, with a real "presence" when he enters a room. Are you saying that's not true?
To: Clara Lou
Interesting note - I just went to the JW website and checked on some of the cases. Of the first 40 listed, 24 have NO documents linked to them. Three are just letters, and many are duplicates.
Larry's got them listed, all 90+ of them as if each is an individual case. Many are duplicates/updates or refilings after he filed them in the wrong place or had them turned away for some other reason.
I couldn't get past 40...too boring with nothing to read once you click on the link!
232
posted on
07/31/2002 5:12:03 PM PDT
by
terilyn
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
LOL! I guess there's somebody out there for everybody.
(I sure wish SOMEBODY had saved that post #243). It was a classic!
233
posted on
07/31/2002 5:13:35 PM PDT
by
terilyn
To: Howlin; DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet; terilyn
Why does every thread involving JW turn into a Klayman debate? Perhaps it's because Judicial Watch uses this forum like its own private advertising site, posting dubious "press releases," no doubt written by Klayman and his cronies. From what I can gather, we're suppose to accept them at face value as God's own truth. Apparently it bothers some of the Klaymanites when some of us spot distortions in them. Besides, we hated spin during the Clinton years, remember? This is pure T spin. There is no difference between Klayman and Clinton: they both want to "do their thing" and have somebody else pay for it. And neither of them accomplish anything.
Yes, I know that, almost all of us know that. The point is that WE ARE BEATING A DEAD HORSE! (In my humble opinion)
8-)
To: subterfuge
Got you. I wish they would stop using this for their own monetary interests.
235
posted on
07/31/2002 5:22:04 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
YOU ARE A HOOT! Make that two hoots and a half.
To: Howlin
Maybe we could start up a weekly "A Day in the LIfe of Larry Klayman" thread. Seems to be enough material for it.
Make that "weakly." HA! :o)
To: Iwo Jima
YOU ARE A HOOT! Make that two hoots and a half.That's not really me, by the way.
To: subterfuge
"Maybe we could start up a weekly "A Day in the LIfe of Larry Klayman" thread." Well...as long as each thread is accompanied by the obligatory "BARF ALERT"! ;)
239
posted on
07/31/2002 5:39:21 PM PDT
by
terilyn
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Awww, I was just going to ask you what color that lovely shade of lipstick you were wearing was.
240
posted on
07/31/2002 5:40:51 PM PDT
by
terilyn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 301-310 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson