Posted on 07/26/2002 7:25:25 PM PDT by jern
CC, I hesitate to ping you to this thread, but as long as you have an ample supply of Tums you should be able to get through it. Oh, and if you ever need a new bicycle, 2T's has connections.
Youre on your bike for the whole day, six and seven hours, in all kinds of weather and conditions, over cobblestones and gravel, in mud and wind and rain, and even hail, and you do not give in to pain .... everything hurts .... your back hurts, your feet hurt, your hands hurt, your neck hurts, your legs hurt, and of course, your butt hurts.
Cycling is a sport that rewards mature champions. It takes physical endurance built up over years, and a head for strategy that comes only with experience .... It would be easy to see the Tour de France as a monumentally inconsequential undertaking: two hundred riders cycling the entire circumference of France, mountains included, over three weeks in the heat of the summer. There is no reason to attempt such a feat of idiocy, other than the fact that some people .... have a need to search in the depths of their stamina for self-definition. Its a contest in purposeless suffering. But for reasons of my own, I think it may be the most gallant athletic endeavor in the world.
And now, on the other end of the intelligence spectrum....
For my money, being the greatest athlete in the world involves strength, speed, agility, hand-eye coordination, mental toughness and the ability to make your body do things that defy description. Chief among them is not pumping your legs up and down while your feet are strapped to bicycle pedals .... (spoken as a true Idiot by the journalist (turned sports critic) who wrote this article)
Id add the ability to consistently analyze ones performance, and that of ones opponents, and to create intelligent (ever-changing) winning strategies. Adding that to the idiots definition above, Armstrong is indeed one of the greatest athletes alive. And Mr. Borges succeeded in doing nothing but shooting himself in the foot by writing this (purposefully imbecilic, for the sake of controversy) article. Ive got better things to waste my anger and frustration on than an article that was written simply to evoke those emotions from its readers.
(For what its worth, Im willing to bet that the only regular exercise Mr. Borges takes part in is speed typing. Probably gets quite winded after a session, too
.)
This fool has no idea what it would take to win the Tour de France. For mental toughness, I would take Armstrong over Bonds, Rice or the Williams Sisters. Notice all of the athletes he names are black. Maybe Ron has a problem with white athletes.
Sounds like Lance fits the dictionary definition to me...But then I don't have a story to file and nothing important or interesting to say.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.