Skip to comments.
Monitor Thy Neighbor (Commentary by Congressman Ron Paul)
Ron Paul via MEW ^
| 07.23.02
| Ron Paul
Posted on 07/23/2002 8:04:51 AM PDT by Registered
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-151 next last
To: Registered
<< STANDING APPLAUSE >>
Thanks for posting this.
2
posted on
07/23/2002 8:08:30 AM PDT
by
freeeee
To: Registered
Ron Paul seems to be about the only true republican left in the party. I wonder how much longer he will run for office, he around 60 or so?
3
posted on
07/23/2002 8:09:37 AM PDT
by
steve50
To: Registered
Ultimately, we have to ask ourselves what kind of society we hope to leave our children and grandchildren. A civilized and free society would not be discussing, much less seriously debating, any proposal to enlist private citizens to act as federal neighborhood snitches. So the real question then is what kind of uncivilized society we hope to leave our children. You can't expect uncivilized people to leave behind a civilized society, can you?
4
posted on
07/23/2002 8:12:16 AM PDT
by
Huck
To: steve50
Ron Paul seems to be about the only true republican left in the party.
I like Rep. Ron Paul a lot. But he's not a Republican. He's really a libertarian who ran and won as a Republican.
Not that I'm complaining. I'm not.
5
posted on
07/23/2002 8:12:31 AM PDT
by
rdb3
To: Registered
What we thought we needed to fear from liberals, we find being championed by conservatives. Right now, George Bush and his fellow travelers compose the greatest threat to freedom and constitutional government that exists. Instead of fighting terrorism, they are actually destroying the very principles of liberty that they claim to be protecting. - Chuck Baldwin
To: rdb3
I don't think the republicans are republicans anymore. Paul is the closet thing we have left to one. We've been highjacked by the statist neocon crowd, little more than the dems of the 60's,IMO
7
posted on
07/23/2002 8:40:26 AM PDT
by
steve50
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: steve50
We've been highjacked by the statist neocon crowd, little more than the dems of the 60's,IMO
According to this mentality of yours, what was the point of me leaving the RATS?
You get attacked either way.
9
posted on
07/23/2002 8:44:39 AM PDT
by
rdb3
To: rdb3
If the only difference is a R or a D after the name there is no difference how you register. Many people have joined the republican party because of it's move to the left. I don't think you beat the party of big government by becoming it.
10
posted on
07/23/2002 8:53:25 AM PDT
by
steve50
To: steve50
Well, let me say this. Since "neo-con" is defined as having moved from liberal to conservative, I wear that label as a badge of honor.
Others deride it.
Whatever.
But I know that I will not venture out into the fringes. To me, anyone on the Right who so openly throws out the term "neo-con" as an insult is on the fringe.
11
posted on
07/23/2002 9:02:48 AM PDT
by
rdb3
To: Registered
So if in my job as sysadmin, I come across files and email that looks like terrorists actually planning something and then actually report it I am now no better than a Stasi snitch.
So if I find out someone is illegally here from the Middle East and I report it, I am now a Stasi snitch.
Ron Paul sounds about the same as the communists complaining about the people who revealed their activities during the Cold War or the librarians who refused to reveal what Soviet diplomats were reading up on.
Perception of police state triumphs over concrete reality.
To: rdb3
That's how you define neocon. Most political observers have different definitions. The fact that those in our party who coined the phrase are now trying to distance themselves from it is interesting.
13
posted on
07/23/2002 9:07:01 AM PDT
by
steve50
To: Registered
Ron Paul is absolutely correct. He is one of the very few in Congress who might be considered "True Patriots", men who put the country first rather than their own selfish interests, but his is a lonely voice.
The Terrorists we have to fear the most are those esconced within our government. in the White House, in both Houses of Congress and even a few in the SCOTUS, to say nothing of the ones hidden within the ranks of the bureaucrats.
We desperately need to clean out the Washington Establishment, and by that I mean Politicians on both sides of the aisle, and return this country to what it was originally and was meant to be, A Republic.
That's my opinion
To: Registered
More anti-government rhetoric from the hero of the libertarian crowd of misfits, malcontents and militants everywhere. Ron Paul needs to get a new approach to politics and life. His current attempts to undermine our civilized society, clearly isn't working and his support beyond the lunatic fringe here on FR is non-existent. Paul's district is 60% Democrat. He would be better served if he became a Democrat. He certainly isn't a Republican and can't be considered a well rounded conservative either, in any true sense of the word.
To: Registered
I remember the stories about the good old days when neighbors sat out on the porch or stoop and kept an eye on each others kids; when the cops on the beat knew the residents by name and checked the doors of businesses at night to make sure that they were locked.... This was, in effect, neighbors and law enforcement monitoring each other.... Now, people " just don't want to get involved".
16
posted on
07/23/2002 9:09:13 AM PDT
by
Consort
To: steve50
Ron Paul was born August 20, 1935.
17
posted on
07/23/2002 9:09:36 AM PDT
by
caltrop
To: Reagan Man
Are you freeping on my tax dollars, spook?
I see you have no problem with the loss of freedoms. If that's what it means to be a conservative, then I don't think I want to be labeled one either.
To: Registered
A civilized and free society would not be discussing, much less seriously debating, any proposal to enlist private citizens to act as federal neighborhood snitches. One would think.
Let's hope TIPS supporters here at FR are not indicative of the nation at large.
19
posted on
07/23/2002 9:16:13 AM PDT
by
Askel5
To: Reagan Man
Rhetoric? You didn't address anything specific that you disagree with Paul on. Talk about double standards.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-151 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson