Mystery men keep handle on Security at Courthouse

Ark. Dem-Gaz | July 22, 2002 | LINDA SATTER

[rdavis84]

"I thought Akal is HQed in New Mexico."

Correct. That was in the posted article. 2 points.

So, where's TEG? How come they disappeared?

[Fred Mertz]

But AKAL of 2002 might be different than the AKAL of 1996 or 1995.

[Catspaw]

Well, there are a few folks that don't think New Mexico is a state because of that "Mexico" thingie in their name.

If NM is anything like our state, there's a registry for all companies that are incorporated in that state, and that corporation papers would include the corporation officers and other basic information. In our case, it's the Secretary of State. It may be different in other states. But if a corp. was operating in New Mexico or using NM as its HQ, there's a very good chance that incorporation papers of some sort would be on file with some state agency. That'd be the place to start for sleuths. Of course, a number of corps are incorporated in Delaware. That'd be the second most logical place to look.

[Catspaw]

You said, hmmmmm....

I suppose you don't even know where to start to do this kind of research, do you?

[Fred Mertz]

I suppose you don't even know where to start to do this kind of research, do you?

Normally, many of us learn from each other and work as a team. You sound like a gang of one.

[Nita Nupress]

The problem here may be that all of us who were on the original threads are too lazy or busy to rehash 6 long threads that unearthed a wealth of information and took more twists and turns than a cheap mystery novel.  And to my knowledge, none of us did a final, concluding "Summary" that I can link to this thread to make it easy for you.

I really can't spend hours sitting here going over this, mainly because I'd have to go back and reread the threads to refresh my memory and that would take too long.  But if you're really interested in knowing more about Teg Security and Akal Security and how they figure into the OKC bombing, you can go read the threads yourself.  They really are kind of exciting to read.  At least, they were exciting last year when we kept turning up new information about Teg.  Today, they may be boring and tedious reading.  Sorry, it's the best I'm willing to do.  

Try reading BlueDogDemo's replies here first.  That may help. http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b3f4d0e454e.htm (Thread 2, I think.  Read replies 114 & 181)

All the threads:

FIRM RAN SECURITY AT OKLA. BOMB SITE
http://www.FreeRepublic.com/forum/a3b3d8e767823.htm

Firm Ran Security At OK Bomb Site Part 2
http://www.FreeRepublic.com/forum/a3b3f4d0e454e.htm

Firm Ran Security At OK Bomb Site Part 3
http://www.FreeRepublic.com/forum/a3b41e2bc54d1.htm

Firm Ran Security At OK Bomb Site Part 4
http://www.FreeRepublic.com/forum/a3b4435b51732.htm

Firm Ran Security At OK Bomb Site - Part 5
http://www.FreeRepublic.com/forum/a3b4a2619093e.htm

Firm Ran Security at OK Bomb Site - Part 6
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b71b20b06f1.htm

 

By the way, if anyone is just trying to distract the thread from a "hot" topic, it may not be necessary.  We basically came to a dead end last year and couldn't go any further on the net.  :-)

 And I'm sorry. Everyone will have to find their own links to read up on cut-outs and front companies. ;-)

[dighton]

Thanks for the links.

[Catspaw]

I already described how to start the research in my post #63.

[Fred Mertz]

I saw it.

[Fred Mertz]

Try #66 on for size.

[Catspaw]

All these Sikh connections. I thought Rep. Dan Burton was also close to the Sikhs.

[Catspaw]

Okay, I've read one of the threads. But why does the current Justice Department and current administration continue its contracts with Akal if they know they had involvement with the Clintons and all the thread I read implies, and the possible involvement of Akal in the OKC bombing? Don't they know, don't they care, or are they also part of the conspiracy?

[Fred Mertz]

I come here looking for answers, but mostly leave with more questions. This one is a hard nut to crack.

[general_re]

She was elected twice. I don't know or particularly care about her politics or views, but she called for one election and lost it. Then she worked in their system again and was re-elected. I guess machine guns are better than elections, huh?

Whoa there, chief. Yes, it's true that Indira Gandhi was killed by her Sikh bodyguards, but it was a surprise to about one person in all of India - Indira Gandhi.

The problem was that at the time (1983-84), there was still a relatively credible Sikh separatist movement in India, albeit one that was losing a great deal of steam after setbacks at the hands of the Indian Army. The Sikh separatists were very much a minority, although I don't think that it's unfair to say that many mainstream Sikhs were sympathetic. Anyway, one of their main leaders had holed up in the Golden Temple of Amritsar with about 400 or so of his supporters.

Now, you must understand, the Golden Temple is the holiest of holies for the Sikhs - it's the Wailing Wall, the Vatican, and Mecca all rolled into one. Here it is:

So of course, in an incredibly foolish move, Gandhi ordered the Indian Army to take the Temple and apprehend (or better yet, kill) the Sikhs holed up within. And even worse than the fact that the Indian Army set foot within the Temple was the fact that the Temple was significantly damaged during the assault.

You must understand the rage of the Sikhs - even moderate, mainstream Sikhs who had not supported the separatists were outraged. Imagine how Jews would feel were part of the Wailing Wall pulled down by the Palestinians, or how Catholics would feel if Muslim terrorists blew up St. Peter's Basilica in Rome, and that's about how the vast majority of Sikhs looked at it.

Just about everyone on the whole Indian subcontinent saw it coming, except for Indira, in her incredible arrogance. Her own hubris killed her as much as anything else.

And that's the whole story on the Sikh killing of Indira Gandhi...

[Betty Jo]

Ask Ethel to go get me somethinng for my headache!

I'm trying to plot out BODANSKY and now you've got me flashbacking to Akel/Teg/Condit!

Remember somehow,archy, I think,wove the Condit condo into Akel?

Did we ever SEC search the company?

If it has contracts all over the country,maybe it's a public company?

Is it some kind of strange spooky deal,like SECURICOR,which is big British ex- military,which has the airport contracs?

Are we sure it's not a subsidiary of Brown Root Halliburton?

And where the heck is OKCSubmariner at?

[Betty Jo]

Freddy, don't forget Condit and Rohrabacher getting political contributions from "The Council of Khalistan",the Sikh separatist group.

Condit worked hard to get India named a "terrorist state".

[Betty Jo]

Fred,remember up above I mentined BODANSKY ?

I googled +Bodansky+sikh.

Bodansky has documented how Pakistan is getting Sikhs to work with Paks on terrorism against India.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend!

[honway]

Sikhs are terrorists. They even assasinated the Prime Minister of India. Money raised in the U.S. by Sikhs go towards funding Sikh terrorism abroad.

Not for commercial use. Solely to be used for the educational purposes of research and open discussion.

The tentacles of the ISI

THE HINDU

August 29, 2000

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE MONSTROUS FACE OF ISI: Bhure Lal; Siddarth Publications, 10, DSIDC Scheme-II, Okhla Industrial Area Phase-II, New Delhi- 110020. Rs. 375.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WHILE DEDICATING the book to the martyrs of the Kargil war, Mr. Bhure Lal has used all his background information on Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), not just to depict its horrendous plans on India, but to warn the people about its designs at subverting and disintegrating the country.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the initial stages, the ISI was directly aiding and funding Kashmiri and Sikh extremists. But, when the U.S. (a long-time ally) started asking uncomfortable questions, it transferred those activities to "private" organisations. The "Pasban", a front of the Jamaat-e-Islami, and the Jamaat-ul- Fuqra, are identified by Mr. Bhure Lal, as such agencies.

[Catspaw]

I come here looking for answers, but mostly leave with more questions. This one is a hard nut to crack.

I've been asking questions, but I'm not getting answers. I keep getting brush-offs and flames.

It's beginning to remind me of what that French guy who wrote the conspiracy book about Flight 77 not really flying into the Pentagon, but it was the US that blew up the Pentagon. When asked what happened to the passengers, he said, in essence, there are some things that cannot be explained.

[honway]

http://www.india-emb.org.eg/Section%207E/..%5cSection%207E%5cEnglish3.html

link

US House Republican Research Committee’s Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare, September 20, 1993:

“The ISI opted to keep the US/CIA out of the camps in order to hide the extent of the ‘volunteer’s’ training programme. Indeed, thousands of Islamist trainees from Indian Kashmir, and to a lesser extent Sikhs from the Punjab, as well as hundreds of Islamists from all over the Arab and Muslim world, were routinely trained in camps originally set up strictly for the training of Afghan Mujahideen.

The sites for Fuqra terrorist training are part of a complex of some 6 camps in the greater Lahore, and some 20 camps in the general Lahore area, in which Kashmiris, Sikhs, and others from India receive terrorist training.

Thus at present the training and preparation of additional high quality terrorists continues to expand.”