This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
Locked on 07/19/2002 11:14:21 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Flame war.
|
Skip to comments.
Halliburton Responds to Larry Klayman's Supersillyous Suit(My Title)
CBS Market Watch "Big Charts" Web Site ^
| 7/10/2002
| MarketWatch.com
Posted on 07/10/2002 11:04:03 AM PDT by SierraWasp
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,121-1,140, 1,141-1,160, 1,161-1,180 ... 3,801-3,815 next last
To: Howlin
Remember Carol-Hu Tex?
To: FreedominJesusChrist
I never stated that in particular. Actually, you did:
...but isn't it possible for a civil lawsuit to have criminal elements involved? I think so.
To: Amelia
Shouldn't you have a pretty good idea there is wrongdoing before you do something like that? Well there you go trying to making sense again ...
Baaaaaad Amelia
1,143
posted on
07/11/2002 9:42:53 PM PDT
by
Mo1
To: nunya bidness
Yep.
To: Registered
Hey, I think you're onto something. Should I buy the stock or play the put/call options?
It's gonna go up, right? Cuz King George rules.
To: deport
How about you deport, how much Halliburton are you going to buy?
To: Howlin; deport
"Ask your buddies over at JW -- or ask Larry himself -- why Larry thinks Cheney might be impeached over something Larry is accusing him of doing BEFORE he was vice president."Howlin,
I still do not understand what you are trying to correct me about. Let's go over the issue of Impeachment from a Constitutional perspective.
Article II, section 4, of the United States Constitution states: "The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, and other High Crimes and Misdemeanors."
No where does it state that these crimes or misdemeanors have to occur when the public official in question was in their current office.
In fact, Ken Starr was also looking into Whitewater and Mena, for added evidence in his Impeachment case against Bill Clinton. Both Mena and Whitewater occured when Bill Clinton was Governor of Arkansas, and not the President.
Impeachment does not require a criminal offense and Bill Clinton committed impeachable crimes that encompassed both criminal and non-criminal offenses. These offenses mainly occured when he was the Governor or Arkansas and if Ken Starr had found enough evidence, Bill Clinton could have been impeached for them, even if these crimes and misdemeanors occured when he was the Governor of Arkansas and not the President of the United States.
To: Fred Mertz
I just created a "Supersillyous" category in my Portfolio Manager...
To: Howlin
"Your vote has just been casted"
I kid you not.
To: Mo1; ned
Well there you go trying to making sense again ...
Actually, that would be ned...right ned?
To: Howlin
Well, it is possible for a civil lawsuit to have criminal elements involved, period.
To: Fred Mertz
Hey, I think you're onto something. Should I buy the stock or play the put/call options? You would not be smart enough to do that. Yes Halliburton stock is a very good stock to buy right now. And yes I own quite a bit.
To: Clara Lou
Your vote has been casted?"LOL! I just voted and had to post about that, myself. What a bunch of morons.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Stop now. You're really showing how little you know.
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
I saw........LOL.
To: Registered
You seem to assume that this is the most important exogenous event affecting Halliburton's financial furture that is likely to emerge. Some might not give it that level of importance, in which event whether to purchase of sell Halliburton must rest primarily on other considerations. As for myself, I simply don't buy individual stocks. I buy mutual funds for diversification, index funds actually, because of reasons I won't bother you with.
1,156
posted on
07/11/2002 9:48:51 PM PDT
by
Torie
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Actually Congress has the power to impeach and and convict Cheney because he was or is bald. Go for it.
1,157
posted on
07/11/2002 9:50:09 PM PDT
by
Torie
To: Torie
Not for being bald while in office though.
To: Howlin
No Howlin. You seem to not understand the issue of Impeachment from a Constitutional perspective.
Regardless of what you say, a public official can be impeached for past actions that occured before they were elected into their current public office or position.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
If the VP committed High Crimes and Misdemeanors then he should be removed, no question about it. But aren't you and your buds over at the watch getting way down that road since you've not even gotten into the court room, much less picked a jury or had any depositions, gathering of evidence, etc.
Now why can't you tell me what the next major annoucement from your buds over at the watch is gonna be? Haven't they told you yet?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,121-1,140, 1,141-1,160, 1,161-1,180 ... 3,801-3,815 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson