Skip to comments.
BREAKING: BRENDA VAN DAM DANCED WITH WESTERFIELD: (Modern Day Westside Story?)7-9-02 Trial Watch
KFMB ^
| July 9, 2002
| KFMB
Posted on 07/08/2002 10:23:15 PM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 921-940, 941-960, 961-980 ... 1,281-1,292 next last
To: BunnySlippers
I admit that I have mainly learned about the case here, but someone chopped my head off when I made the point that child porn was worse than swinging, saying there was no proof about Westerfield being into that. Sheesh Whose stuff did the police confiscate?
To: jacquej
Bunny = Spunky... now I am the one with a visual problem... too much of that cheap white chablis, I guess!
942
posted on
07/09/2002 4:42:09 PM PDT
by
jacquej
To: GoRepGo
why would she be testifying without all the evidence present? very odd... Not in this case.
To: BunnySlippers
Wow. I have been posting on these threads since day one. Can you please point me in the direction of any posts that indicate anyone here has stated or believes that swinging is worse than child molestation or pedophilia?
To: spectre
I agree. That was one of the most disgusting things I have read on these threads.
To: Angelique
Whose stuff did the police confiscate
There was quite a bit of testimony last week from the defense's computer expert, that the porn in question was accessed by Neal, Westerfield's teenaged son. Do try to keep up.
To: BunnySlippers
DW's black boots missing ... presumably blood soaked Highlights without bias?? I'd hate to see it with bias.
Is there an ignore feature on this board?
948
posted on
07/09/2002 4:44:19 PM PDT
by
Krodg
To: Angelique
The Defense was not allowed to get any computer porn info or tapes from the Van Dams, which is not to say they did or did not have it...It simply could not be introduced if they did.
sw
949
posted on
07/09/2002 4:44:59 PM PDT
by
spectre
To: BunnySlippers
I don't know about the porno vs. swinging on a scale of depravity. But I do know that the swinging was inside the vanDam home and the "live porno" was thousands of miles a way. Which would be the biggest threat to your home?
To: jacquej
LOL
951
posted on
07/09/2002 4:46:10 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: Krodg
Is there an ignore feature on this board? YEP. I use it all the time.
To: winodog
Thats a lie. I have never heard anyone say anything such thing. You are welcome to prove me wrong. What's a lie? The news article? The Dow Jones broadtape which runs during the market is exclusively the big news outslets. Do you have a Reuters machine and I can tell you how to pull it up? I will have to go to work to pull the story up there.
What do you find so unbeliveable? That child pornographers actually film infants? How naive you are! They film every such attrocity that gets them off.
To: Rheo
As far as I know the prints have never been addressed since the PH. Dang, wish they'd tell us. Enquiring minds and all that.
954
posted on
07/09/2002 4:47:41 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: All
NEVER argue with an idiot. By the time you are done, no one will be able to tell the difference.
To: Krodg
See, that button works.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; UCANSEE2
This is the speculation-----that DW is being framed by the doing of laundry at DW's. There are such huge holes in this theory it is almost ridiculous to address it.
BUT, here are some points:
DW went to fetch his MH very close in time to Danielle being found missing. The testimony of Keith S. of DW picking up the MH and the 911 call is objective evidence of this. So planting of evidence in the MH is out.
Then no knowledge that DW was gone or for how long. In fact, DW did return to the neighborhood later that day. He never said his laundry room had been used----he never denied doing the laundry *from his camping trip* himself.
There are other holes, but you get the pic.
To: John Jamieson
I don't know about the porno vs. swinging on a scale of depravity. But I do know that the swinging was inside the vanDam home and the "live porno" was thousands of miles a way. Which would be the biggest threat to your home? I would say that if I have swingers next door I would disapprove wildly of their activities. But they probably wouldn't present a danger to me.
But if my children were still small that the person who gets off on sexual acts of children and fantasizing about such would be the greater danger ... definately.
To: cyncooper
I don't understand your first comments, Cyn.
-----that DW is being framed by the doing of laundry at DW's
What do you mean there?
To: spectre
How dare you assume that ME or any of us think that raping little children and babies is OK and Swinging is worse? What's up with you, anyway? How disgusting you would think that of us...cheap shot, kiddo! Look at past posts, dear.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 921-940, 941-960, 961-980 ... 1,281-1,292 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson