Posted on 07/04/2002 11:06:04 PM PDT by ChicagoRepublican
Is that why you called me a "presumptuous sow," because you are a fan of Mother Teresa? Or because as a newbie, just registered in May of this year, you don't realize that ad hominem attacks are not useful in explaining your position, and in fact are what as known as "abuse"
Do you think that attacking Katherine Harris and Linda Tripp and Paula Jones based on their make-up, hair-do, and looks rather than their beliefs and actions was sexist?
Do you only disagree with women by making some reference to pigs? Perhaps if I had been a man you would have made a more rational explanation of why you felt my comment on the traitorous New York Times was unacceptable to you. Or would you simply have resorted to name calling, but masculinized it, as "presumptuous bore?"
I am not wishing for the New York Times to be bombed nor anyone to be killed as a result of the Times' treasonous behavior, but I am musing whether God notices such continued unethical behavior.
I would not have okayed the bombing of the WTC in the first place, and I think it was the result of evil pure and simple, not "part of God's plan".
But I could be wrong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.