Posted on 07/01/2002 6:51:05 PM PDT by ZGuy
2. They'll win in court too.
Technically not an SUV but the 440-4 V-8 and TorqueFlite trany will out pull what passes for power in most of the SUV's on the road these days.
Passes everything on the road but the gas station.
Near as I can tell, reading the story about innocent Christians in Bosnia being bombed (by the USAF) three days after the Saudis inked a major deal for American fighter planes, the only rational interpretation of that I can see is that SUVs kill Christians. That's aside from SUV owners all being tailgaters, wife-beaters, fourflushers, deadbeats and losers of various and sundry other stripes of course.
About the only other thing that would qualify in that class is the Buick Deuce-and-a-quarter pimpmobile...
By the way, I pay as much attention as I can afford to, but I couldn't find any reference to "his highness" in your smashing link!
THE DRIVING TAX
2 cents per mile
50 cents per gallon
$3500 for each new SUV, Minivan and truck
http://fixtraffic.org/drivingtax.html
http://fixtraffic.org/
On April 28, Assembly Bill 1058 passed an assembly commitee with a whopping 8-3 vote. UPDATE: IT HAS NOW PASSED THE SENATE, IS HEADED TO THE ASSEMBLY AND ON THE FAST TRACK TO THE GOVERNOR'S DESK! This bill will give California Air Resources Board the go ahead to work on ways to reduce "greenhouse gases." In one report CARB authored, they suggested the per mile tax, gas tax increase and SUV tax. Proponents of the bill are quick to argue that this bill does not raise taxes and CARB does not have the authority to enact any of their suggestions.
That is true, because legislation to enact these ideas would have to come out of the state legislature. However, the state is in a big budget mess right now and politicians are scrambling to find more revenue. If CARB comes back and says that we NEED these taxes to "reduce emissions," then the politicians can hide behind CARB when they institute these taxes. When people complain, they can simply claim that they did it for the environment and that CARB said they had to do it.
This is a combination money grab by Sacramento and a contiunation of the "car is evil" mantra. The government continues to use the car as a cash cow, while simulatenously making it harder for you to drive by refusing to make desperately needed highway improvements. Politicians can morally justify taking grabbing money from motorists because, after all, you should not be driving anyway.
I'm sure all the California freepers appreciate that.
Nope. We don't. And we're mighty embarrassed over these bozo's in office.....why doesn't everyone try calling our senators with us? I'm sure we can drum up zip codes, if you need....(I didn't say that!)
At 231 inches (that's 19 feet 4 inches) long, no Buick comes close to this baby. We are talking 4,676 lbs of Chrysler New Yorker Brougham in 2-door style.
The total tax package should, IMHO cause the Demos who passed this to be hunted down like mad dogs in November (unless Ca voters are TOTALLY brain dead).
I did crank 'em up on Earth Day just to do my fair share to prevent the next Ice Age we were warned about in the 1970's.....
Unfortunately, California's real close to being a write-off for the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave...
As far as SUV's go, I don't care for them for one reason: For whatever reason, it seems like more SUV drivers than car drivers drive in an impolite, discourteous manner. I see too many SUV drivers who apparently believe that their behemoth gives them an inalienable right to drive as rudely as possible while on the city roads. As an aside, my observations are that rural SUV drivers are polite, so it may just be the city's spiritual pollution effect. Still, they're especially dangerous to everyone else on the road.
Of course, as soon as I come up with the money, I'm buying a Hummer. Or a Cessna 177. Or both... (grin)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.