Skip to comments.
VAN DAM vs. Westerfield, 6-24-02: Televised proceedings a far cry from O.J. fiasco!
Union Tribune ^
| June 24, 2002
| Alex Roth
Posted on 06/24/2002 9:06:32 AM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480, 481-500, 501-520 ... 821-840 next last
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Jaded, all opinions count, including yours. Doesn't mean you're right... I would like to restate what you said, Kim.
ALL opinions have the same value. None of them, as applies to the court case, count at all.
To: All
Re: Danielle's pjs
Damon testified that the kids went upstairs and got into their pjs and got into bed. No mention of romping with the dog after getting ready for bed. He also said Danielle was in her bed with covers pulled up by the time he got in her room to say goodnight.
Also, Brenda testified that she bought all their clothes and she knew what was missing so that's how she knew which pjs Danielle was wearing.
482
posted on
06/24/2002 5:49:00 PM PDT
by
Karson
To: Greg Weston
I've seen the vd's REAMED for this halloween afterparty sex swap...and haven't seen dw reamed with the same force for the child porn...pics of kids who could be dead now cuz of puberty... (well, I did see him reamed for it on other forums...justly so)
To: UCANSEE2
opinions are worth squat..but forcing them down the throats of apologists is just well rude! ;-D
To: Mrs.Liberty
Please see
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/705164/posts?page=458#458
To: Karson
"Also, Brenda testified that she bought all their clothes and she knew what was missing so that's how she knew which pjs Danielle was wearing."
That implies that the pjs found on the floor with the blood on the left cuff were NOT the ones she was wearing when she went to bed, since she was figuring out what was missing.
486
posted on
06/24/2002 5:53:02 PM PDT
by
sbnsd
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Very selective aren't they? They get on the Van Dam's cases for being swingers. But isn't DW a swinger (and God knows what else) too? Doesn't that mean he can't be trusted as well??
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
if he knew brenda in an intimate wayMaybe he doesn't remember it or it wasn't "intimate".
488
posted on
06/24/2002 5:54:04 PM PDT
by
demsux
To: jacquej
Just tossing out my years of experience with raising kids and dogs... it was blood and hair everywhere, and no matter how hard I tried to keep up with it all, I am sure if I were accused of a crime, they would still find enough evidence hanging around to try to make something of, even though my youngest of four is now going on 30! I couldn't agree with you more!
To: All
I have a question about the outfit that Brenda bought for Danielle on Friday 2/1. She said they bought a "sparkly" outfit for the upcoming father daughter dance. Dorie Savage said there were "sparklies" on Danielle's floor. Did they come from Danielle's new outfit? If so, When did Danielle wear the outfit??
490
posted on
06/24/2002 5:56:41 PM PDT
by
Karson
To: Greg Weston; demsux
Oh I hope the implication isn't that men can't be ho's too..
demsux . DW appears to be a bar hopper prone to blackouts..maybe he doesn't remember the tryst with brenda. In that case, he can't admit what he has no clue about. When you say not intimate, are you saying brenda raped him during a blackout?
To: Greg Weston
let me guess .. you only read press reports from a few months ago, no interest in trial evidence? thought so.
492
posted on
06/24/2002 5:59:19 PM PDT
by
fnord
To: cyncooper
Hey cyn, I haven't been able to get an explanation/theory on this yet:
Why is there no blood between the VD home and the MH.
The prosecution has gone to great pains to show that she bled in her room AND in the MH.
How do you think she went from bleeding in the VD home to bleeding in the MH without leaving blood in between?
493
posted on
06/24/2002 6:02:11 PM PDT
by
demsux
To: Karson
Maybe she tried it on when she got home? Sounds like her floor wasn't vacuumed after the dress with either taken out of the package or plastic bag it was covered in..
To: fnord
What the evidence that the DNA fits? Explain it away. Go for it.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; All
I will address the issue of being called dw defender or vd apologist..but will that help or improve the quality of this thread? KIM, to help you, I will ADDRESS THE ISSUE stated above.
STICKS and STONES may BREAK my BONES, but WORDS will NEVER HURT ME !!!!!!!!
We are all human beings on FREE REPUBLIC. We have screen names. Everyone should stick to the screen names and not some antagonistic label based on sides or opinions. If you are an adult, act like one. If you don't know how to discuss a subject or provide proper argument, then maybe you should spend your time better somewhere else.
To: fnord
This isn't a flame, just a question...
What evidence would you consider as a proof of guilt?
To: Greg Weston
hmmm, are you playing DUmb? or what?
498
posted on
06/24/2002 6:05:41 PM PDT
by
fnord
To: demsux
Maybe he doesn't rememberOne step ahead of ya...
499
posted on
06/24/2002 6:06:31 PM PDT
by
demsux
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
WHen he found out he was to be tried..if he was having an affair with BVD, he's got to be the worst advised man on earth to not tell. Maybe he did tell. Do you think, after he was under arrest, placed in jail, and the prosecution HAS THEIR MAN, that the Prosecutor, or the VD's or the PRESS would TELL US ?????????????
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480, 481-500, 501-520 ... 821-840 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson