Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big Food Fight [re: first tobacco, now food]
INSIGHT magazine ^ | June 2002 | John Berlau

Posted on 06/24/2002 7:29:06 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 06/24/2002 7:29:06 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Considering how many big fat bloated Americans there are, the lawyers should keep busy for a while.
2 posted on 06/24/2002 7:39:34 AM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck
The trial lawyers should form a corporation to sell shares on the DOW. Looks like the only sure bet out there to me, and g@d knows the market could use the boost.
3 posted on 06/24/2002 7:45:35 AM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: steve50
The trial lawyers should form a corporation to sell shares on the DOW. Looks like the only sure bet out there to me, and g@d knows the market could use the boost.

Wow. Scary thought.

4 posted on 06/24/2002 7:53:28 AM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
And right now what some call the professional health nannies are in high gear demonizing fatty and junk food the same way tobacco was demonized. Longtime self-styled consumer activist and former presidential candidate Ralph Nader asserted in the New York Times Magazine in June that "McDonald's double cheeseburgers [are] a weapon of mass destruction." Pop singer Moby recently said on HBO's Dennis Miller Live that "all the lawsuits" will force fast-food restaurants to become totally vegetarian in 25 years. In 1998 Kelly Brownell, director of Yale University's Center for Eating and Weight Disorders, told the Boston Herald, "There is no difference between Ronald McDonald and Joe Camel. … We need to start thinking about this in a more militant way."

What happened to "lifestyle choice?"
"Individual rights?"

They propogandize and dictate through liberal trial lawyers what lifestyle they've chosen for us. Only the lifestyles they choose for us are politically correct. We'll have individual rights only when they allow us to have them.
Forcing someone to think contrary to their conscience creates hate.
Hate creates violence.
Violence creates war.
Political correctness laws and their thought police have created more hate in this world than ever before.
What they say they're doing to save humanity from itself is destroying humanities free will instead.
Only hate, violence, war will result from every oppressive law the left leaning heart can create.

No thanks. I'd prefer not to have my soul imprisoned by liberal extremists. My lifestyle choice is one with FREE WILL.

5 posted on 06/24/2002 7:55:45 AM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
I, for one, have become bored smacking the hell out of smokers and relish the thought of beating on fat people.

While I'm helping to reduce fat people to the status of lepers I'll be thinking of who the next group will be that I can pummel.

Hummmm.....How about the Boy Scouts ,white males, hetrosexual marriage, religion, moralists, Costitutionalists, our Founding Fathers, the rule of law, property rights, privacy rights , ....... hang on.

I'll think of one.

6 posted on 06/24/2002 8:04:15 AM PDT by G.Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *puff_list
OOOhhhhh Baby, can you say, "We TOLD you so"?

Let's take them in order.

As Insight reported in June 1997, "many also wonder if the demonizing of cigarettes will lead to a 'slippery slope' in which caffeine, fatty food, chocolate and anything else the public-health community might deem bad or politically incorrect becomes subject to regulation or prohibition" [see "Fighting the Tobacco Wars," June 16, 1997].
Can you say,"We TOLD you so."?

Longtime antitobacco crusader John Banzhaf ridiculed this notion. Cigarettes were a uniquely dangerous product, he and other lawsuit supporters maintained.
Of COURSE he ridiculed the notion. Don't give any OTHER business a heads up that they are coming after you NEXT.

But there's no other industry in the United States that kills anywhere near 500,000 people a year."
My, my, where DO the numbers come from? first it was 300,000, then 400,000, now it's 500,000, even though according to them LESS people are smoking.

That was then and this is now. Five years later, fresh from his victory over tobacco companies, Banzhaf is a leader of a movement of trial lawyers and public-health activists who are marshaling the strategies used against tobacco to go after fast-food restaurants and food processors that sell "fatty" food, candy, soft drinks and other consumables deemed politically incorrect.
Ah, another 'leader'. Sieg Heil!

"Hit junk-food junkies where it hurts: in their wallets" by "slapping high-fat, low-nutrition foods with a substantial government 'sin' tax."
What do you say we hit KELLY where it hurts. Like, upside the head!

the states have been hurting for revenue in the Clinton economic downturn, and public-health activists are pitching food excise tariffs as small taxes that could be turned into bigger ones after the pubic gets used to them.
The old boiling frog method.

To compound this, the IRS in April classified obesity as a "disease" for deduction of medical expenses. This reminds many observers of when Food and Drug Administration Commissioner David Kessler shifted the blame from individual smokers to the tobacco companies by calling smoking a "pediatric disease." Tort reformer Schwartz says, "That's important, because if obesity is a disease, then it's not your fault. That's a very important step because the plaintiffs' lawyers and those who want to make an assault on fatty food have to move away from the concept of individual responsibility just like the antitobacco people had to move away from the idea that you choose to smoke."
What is the IRSdoing classifying ANYTHING as a 'disease'?
Yes, just as the classification of 'addictive' was changed for tobacco so will the classification of 'fat', 'obese', and 'food' be changed.

7 posted on 06/24/2002 8:08:41 AM PDT by Just another Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
Marked out because they have ALREADY been pummeled?
Yeh, well, that's the way the country is headed, isn't it?
8 posted on 06/24/2002 8:11:07 AM PDT by Just another Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Milk commercials "tell you, 'Drink this milk for health reasons,' but then they fail to tell you that milk has a lot of saturated fat and cholesterol, and that you can get all of whatever these health benefits are without these risks by drinking skim milk," Banzhaf says. "That, to me, is very close to McDonald's."

WRONG. The FDA stopped the milk lobby from using any claims to the health benefits of milk some years ago. It seems these same fat nazis didn't like the "milk it does a body good" ads.

9 posted on 06/24/2002 8:11:17 AM PDT by Gaston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
very funny post.
10 posted on 06/24/2002 8:24:08 AM PDT by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe; G.Mason; concerned about politics
I hope the soccer moms are happy....they were the "useful idiots" that the trial lawyers used to ram the tobacco issue through the courts. Since everything has to be "for the children", lets see how they enjoy paying $10 for each happy meal that they buy their little rug rats!

I really don't see anything that will stop this from happening. The courts are shielded from public outrage. Sure, we can make all the noise we want, but all that's required is for the trial lawyers to win is for them to get 12 stupid trailer park residents to sit on a jury and an arrogant judge with a lifetime appointment to the bench.
11 posted on 06/24/2002 8:26:02 AM PDT by Orangedog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Animal fat is a natural substance easily digested by the human body when used with a whole grain. McDonalds should just make their buns a little more rustic. Offer a choice, so they cannot be blamed for lifestyle choices..

It's not animal fat so much that's doing the nation damage. It's processed fats. They're plastic food after being processed. The body cannot rid itself of them.

Put some margerine on a plate and place it on a windowsill. With the exception of an occational fly falling into it, even the bugs won't eat it! Mold won't eat it! It dries into a plastic chunk!
This is the food the liberals want us to eat?
I think the reason the liberals are so wacked out is because their brains are starving. They eat the real trash without substanance.

12 posted on 06/24/2002 8:36:45 AM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
CONT'D...

Try Crisco. Bugs and mold won't eat that either.
It appears even bugs and mold have wiser brains than liberals. Go figure.

13 posted on 06/24/2002 8:46:00 AM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe
My, my, where DO the numbers come from?

If your a smoker, you die because you smoke!

For example;
My mother had rheumatic fever as a child, and was told in her teens she would probably not live to be 20. The fever damaged her heart. She later had an artificial valve implanted in her heart and took massive quantities of blood thinner.
When I was born she had TB, and later discovered she also had myesthinia gravis (sp?).

BUT..because she also smoked for several years, her death certificate said she died from smoking.
She was 64.

14 posted on 06/24/2002 8:47:17 AM PDT by MamaTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
If I want to buy a couple dozen Twinkies today and spend all day eating them, I should be able to do so. Why? Because I'm an American and have the right to become a fat@$$! Does the phrase "Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" mean ANYTHING anymore?!?!

I'm hungry.
15 posted on 06/24/2002 8:51:08 AM PDT by Genesis defender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
"If mighty McDonald's is willing to shell out $12 million for this kind of suit, then it's quite possible that other companies will shell out likewise."

Excactly, but maybe when you hit the majority of average PEOPLE, these average people will wake up, and start fighting the life style police.

16 posted on 06/24/2002 12:24:16 PM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
I'll think of one.

LOL, you don't have to, the health police is waaaaay ahead of you.

17 posted on 06/24/2002 12:27:30 PM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
These people must all die. There is no other apparent method to stop this nonsense, which will end up costing us billion$of dollar$. Also, close the law schools for ten years. We have a super-abundance of lawyers...and this is not good for our nation.
18 posted on 06/24/2002 12:35:44 PM PDT by szweig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
I hear video games are addictive too. Maybe we should sue for all the homework the kids blow off.
19 posted on 06/24/2002 4:31:48 PM PDT by mindprism.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson