Skip to comments.
Mother Takes Aim At Top Gunmaker
The New York Daily News ^
| June 11, 2002
| Patrice O'Shaughnessy
Posted on 06/12/2002 3:32:58 PM PDT by Pern
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
"The manufacturer doesn't care about lives, just money." Now that's the pot calling the kettle black.
1
posted on
06/12/2002 3:32:59 PM PDT
by
Pern
To: Pern
This has been tried countless times, and struck down over and over again.
2
posted on
06/12/2002 3:35:12 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
To: Pern
I put 220 rounds through a Bryco .380 without a single malfunction. Accuracy was pretty crummy, and the gun's ergonomics 'bit' (too bad, since it actually fit comfortably in my hand otherwise) but not quite as junky as expected.
3
posted on
06/12/2002 3:36:27 PM PDT
by
supercat
To: Pern
"Take this picture, show it to the gun manufacturer," she said, holding a photograph of Anita Smith. I wonder what would happen if the Jennings were to solicit photos and stories of people who defended themselves with the affordable handguns they sell?
4
posted on
06/12/2002 3:39:03 PM PDT
by
supercat
To: Pern
Wonder if she has tried sueing the killers, or don't they have enough mopney for her?
5
posted on
06/12/2002 3:39:25 PM PDT
by
dts32041
To: dts32041
frivolouslawsuit.com
To: Pern
For the pathetic wretch Joan Smith I wish frustration in her demented crusade.
Then anger, followed by despair.
And finally the sort of brain-rotting madness that leaves just enough of her mind intact so that she can fully experience suffering without reprieve.
Oh yes...
I wish her a long, long life as well.
7
posted on
06/12/2002 3:45:52 PM PDT
by
DWSUWF
To: Pern
As long as she's at it why not sue Boeing for making aircraft that explode.
8
posted on
06/12/2002 3:46:08 PM PDT
by
ChiMark
To: Pern
So if I follow her logic, Sig Sauer is a responsible gun company because they charge 10 times as much for their product, thereby making them unaffordable to criminals...but the same criminals commonly cough up 10 times the price of the Jennings 'on the street' to buy them after they are stolen from poor people...I'm getting dizzy here...
9
posted on
06/12/2002 3:51:30 PM PDT
by
Sender
To: Sender
ROFLMAO!!!
To: *bang_list
To: Pern
From the article: "I was against the death penalty, until it was at my front door," she said.
If she and her family had exercised their right to keep and bear arms, they would not have been victimized by a criminal who they are now willing to execute. They could have fought back. She is to blame for the helplessness of her family.
To: Pern
"The Wendy's gun cost $169.95 in the store and was resold for $250, but a weapon like that normally fetches $500 on the street, ATF agents said.The profit potential increases the chances the weapon will enter the illegal market and be used in a crime." Finally, undeniable market driven proof that there is no gunshow loophole.
13
posted on
06/12/2002 5:44:38 PM PDT
by
foto
To: Sender
Yes, me too. Very dizzy. And I suspect that even the most left-leaning judge isn't going to buy the argument that the seller has a duty to price the merchandise so high as to preclude it's resale on the street at a profit. These gang thugs have plenty of money. Take the $169 guns that they pay $500 for off the market, and they'll just start paying $1000 for the $600-700 guns. Of course they'll each have to do a couple more armed robberies to cover this increase in their cost of doing business.
To: foto
Finally, undeniable market driven proof that there is no gunshow loophole.Nor any OTHER kind of loophole. Note that the guns are sold legitimately at retail, then STOLEN before 'street' resale.
Better doorlocks, anyone?
15
posted on
06/12/2002 6:07:09 PM PDT
by
ninenot
To: ninenot
Where can I find a lawyer willing to sue fence post makers? I've just got to sue them after all that nasty fence post killed my Jeremy. Better yet can I sue the government of TN for failing to keep it's contract to make my child's killer serve 20 years he plea bargained for?
I detest brainless twits.
Pro Life, Pro Death Penalty and PRO SECOND AMENDMENT.
16
posted on
06/12/2002 7:44:57 PM PDT
by
GailA

SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
17
posted on
06/12/2002 7:46:56 PM PDT
by
Mo1
To: Pern
A gun is basically just a gas powered hole punch..
If this is the standard, holding the manufacturer of the hole punch liable for the things it punches holes in then what's next?
You cut your hand off with a circular saw and have a basis to sue? You sue the pencil manufacturer for your bad handwriting? You sue pontiac for your speeding tickets?
If it's working as designed than I can see no basis for a suit..
18
posted on
06/12/2002 8:00:44 PM PDT
by
Jhoffa_
To: Pern
If having a Saturday Night Special means that I will live to see Sunday morning, I'm all for it.
19
posted on
06/12/2002 8:03:54 PM PDT
by
drlevy88
To: drlevy88
"If having a Saturday Night Special means that I will live to see Sunday morning, I'm all for it."
For me, it is not as much a matter of living to see another day as it is that I just couldn't live with myself if I let one of these idiots kill me.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson