"We control two nuclear missiles" Hafiz Muhammad Saeed

www.markazdawa.org ^ | Jun 3 2002 | staff

[Kenton]

Time to target the Grand Mosque in Mecca with a very dirty ICBM. Then explain to all the "Religion of Peace" muslims to get rid of their Islamonazis or the annual Haj to Mecca is gonna become a really nasty pilgramage.

[Delbert]

...Go for the nest.....That was very cool....Islam is Da Debils Bidness

[Thorondir]

Oh yeah!

Human civilization had better wake up and get as serious about its survival as the ceventh-century mohammedan savages are about our annihilation!

[My Identity]

ping

[galt-jw]

if terrorists nuke the US, we would have to know who it is, and where they are from. we would never nuke saudi, or even iraq. we may as well us our nukes for boat anchors. they will never be used in retaliation for a terrorist attack.

[Orangedog]

I say we go for the nest.

Dubya is doing ok, but I think Reagan would have put all of the Islamic nations of the world on notice in a way that left no room for misunderstanding...

"The Islamic world has not only tollerated, but has done nothing to discourage Terrorism since it's rise to prominence in the Middle East during the last century. The most radical Islamic fanatics have taken your silence as tacit approval of their murderous actions. You have allowed them to operate in your nations for decades. These terrorist movements were cultivated in your homelands and your negligence to remove this cancer from the civalized world will no longer go unnoticed. Today The United States of America is putting the entire Islamic world on notice; if ANY Islamic group or individual aquires and uses a weapon of mass distruction against the United States or any of it's interests, an order will immediately be issued for a immediate thermo-nuclear strike against the Grand Mosque in Mecca. The warhead's yeild will be no less than 15 megatons. This will be sufficient to wipe Mecca and all of it's structures from the face of the Earth. We do not want war with the Islamic world. We have gone to great links to avoid doing so. But you will pay a high price for allowing these people to operate openly in your own back yards with impunity. You know who all of them are, and you likely know where they are right now. It is in you best interest to either turn them over to us immediately, or tell us who and where they are."

[itssoamusing]

#26 Perfectly Stated!!!!!

[d4now]

bump for later

[TrappedInLiberalHell]

I said this months and months ago. I have been waiting for someone "not so loyal" to Musharaff in the Pak military to light one of their theatre missiles off.

It must be a slow nukes day. No nukes is good nukes.

[Poohbah]

"I know what you're thinking. Did the skipper of the Nebraska fire 24 missiles or only 23? Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement, he kinda lost track himself. But being that this is a Trident submarine, the most powerful SSBN in the world, and one shot would blow Islamabad and its suburbs clean off the map, you've got to ask yourself one question: Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya punk?"

[Pearls Before Swine]

Well, Saeed, the US of A controls thousands of nuclear missiles, most of which are much more powerful than the crap that Pakistan has produced. If you wackos use them against our nation, you should know that your nation and the rest of the world's terrorist nations will have a near monopoly on the world supply of radioactive slag.

I hear you. Do you think our government would do the deed, though? Would they feel guilty about maybe leveling the wrong country if they were only "pretty sure" about where a smuggled nuke came from? I wonder...

[BillaryBeGone]

So, it's the year 2015. A father takes his 12-year-old son to the site of what once was the World Trade Center. At the memorial that currently sits on the site, he explains to his son what happened that awful September day in 2001. "Son," he said, "some very nasty Muslims hijacked two jetliners and flew them into the beautiful, majestic buildings that stood here. Thousands of people died on that day." His son responded, "Dad, what's a Muslim?"

[Ancesthntr]

I would hope that we wouldn't just throw around nukes without knowing who was guilty - we are, after all, a reasonably moral nation. But when we do find out for sure...

[Pagey]

"...if ANY Islamic group or individual aquires and uses a weapon of mass distruction against the United States or any of it's interests, an order will immediately be issued for a immediate thermo-nuclear strike against..."

I agree this reads wonderfully, it's just that we live in a different time period now.I don't believe there is a President of the US or a future POTUS that would ever utter these words.This would mean we make a list of Countries that have Nukes.How many of them are against us?Do our elected officials include Saudi Arabia on that list? See,we can't react that way,because it's too Easy and Complicated.It then becomes a free for all,end of the world scenario.(I do believe they've launched the beginning of WW 3 on us though,through their (Islamic Fundamentalists) statements BTW,and this possibility never gets addressed)