Posted on 06/04/2002 8:51:50 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
I wish I could be so optimistic. I have yet to see a SINGLE nazi federal gun law removed from the books unless it was replaced by something worse.
Now tell me the one about the Air Marshall again ....
Once upon a time......
Foreign steel imports were being subsidized by their governments' illegal actions--that's what Bush sought to curb. But, if your livelihood does not depend on making and selling steel legally, who cares?
I have even heard that some gun-owners have more than just a single gun and I suspect that they do so in order to ensure that everyone who needs a gun during a crisis may have one.
Air marshalls have considerable training on weapon retention--far more (I would hope) than most CCW carriers. In addition, they also have the authority, once they have revealed themselves--to demand that everyone else remain outside of grabbing distance (IIRC there was a bit of a stink awhile ago because an air marshall who reacted to a crazed passenger did precisely that for the duration of the flight). Ordinary citizens with CCWs would not have the authority to forbid other people from getting close enough to grab their weapons, and lacking such authority could not reasonably keep their weapons safe.
BTW, while sky marshalls may be a useful adjunct to arming pilots, the armed pilots should be the most important component of flight security.
Seems this would create a real sight picture problem, panic in the cabin, aircraft trim adjustment needed, and great potential for the bad guys to nab hostages.
We know what the score is, keep control of the plane in the proper hands or die. Either by the terrorist's hands or by one of our own missiles.
Give the pilots the means to defend the cockpit, surely. But if you want me to get on an aircraft, you will not deny me the means to defend myself, even a pocket knife would help.
In the meantime, there is noplace I need to go I can't drive and at least retain an item which can be used as an expedient weapon. (Large Crescent wrench, pipe wrench or the like).
I can drive 700 miles west, 400 miles east, 70 miles north, or over 200 south and carry a pistol concealed the whole way, legally. I don't need a plane and refuse to place my safety solely in the hands of one other person who may be outnumbered, out gunned, or simply 'made' and neutralized by people who have shown a predilection toward doing their research.
Like the pilots, who already have control over life and death, many CCW holders would gratefully accept the additional training and responsibility, in exchange for full faith and credit under the Constitution for their licenses.
Crossing a state border does not turn me into a homicidal maniac, regardless of altitude.
I'm with you there. In the close quarters of an airplane cabin, a firearm's advantage over a bladed or blunt weapon are much smaller than in a more open environment. Allowing passengers to have at least a small blade would ensure that passengers' advantage in numbers would outweigh a terrorist's advantage in weaponry or training.
If there are more terrorists than passengers, the terorists will win (a pyrhic victory). Otherwise, the passengers should overcome.
Bloody, granted, and quite possibly a bit of a free-for-all, but cheap and effective.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.