Skip to comments.
Reverse Discrimination Lawsuit Against the IRS, Need Freeper Help!
me ^
| 05092002
| truth defector
Posted on 05/10/2002 9:41:24 PM PDT by truth defector
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: truth defector
all this uncle slammo attention over a lousy $4 million lawsuit? chee, clintbilly got that much for a handful of speaking engagements.
21
posted on
05/10/2002 11:06:11 PM PDT
by
drlevy88
To: truth defector
Medication can often help in cases such as this.
22
posted on
05/11/2002 10:31:46 AM PDT
by
boris
To: boris
bump!!!!!
23
posted on
05/11/2002 11:17:22 AM PDT
by
The Bolt
To: The Bolt
On two occasions I didn't receive motions and or material from the court and/or U. S. Attorney. I later found out about it after the motion had been ruled on. Also, on one occasion I received notice from the U.S. Attorney where the package had been opened and then resealed with tape. One time I received notice of a teleconference after I had already missed the teleconference. I received the letter in February but it was dated in December of the preceding year and the teleconference was in January. Guess what? Bill Clinton was in Chicago the day of the teleconferencewith the Merit Systems Protection Board in Chicago.
Then in 2000 Clinton was scheduled to be in Kansas City (where I live) at Farhad Azima's house on a fundraiser for Hitlery on the four year anniversary of my removal from the Service on 10/13/2000.
I waited on a ruling from the General Counsel in Washington for about 18 months while Clinton waited to appoint the new official. It turns out the official appointed was the same official who had made the ruling at the regional level. The law clearly states that the Union and Agency are responsible for backpay awards, but somehow the Federal Labor Relations Authority read that to mean something entirely different.
Of course you would have to read the case in the 10th Circuit, but in the appeal to the Federal Circuit, three patent attorneys, no less, ruling on a civil rights case, signed off on a pack of lies to justify the ruling.
To: truth defector
The letter and contents of the case going before the Supreme Court in the Fall of 1998 that I sent to Judicial Watch (return receit certified), was returned to me 30 days, or so, later marked as unclaimed. The zip code had been lined through and replaced with an erroneous zip, and hand written in was "not official." I had used the address I found on their website. Don't know what this monkey business was all about. I don't think the Post Office cares, because when I reported mail tampering (a federal offense probably) on the letter I received from the 10th Ciruit that was opened and then taped back shut, I never heard a word back from them.
To: Dave S
bump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson