Skip to comments.
No Case Vs. Man Who Knew Hijackers (BULL! Case thrown out on outrageous technicality)
AP via Yahoo! ^
| Tue Apr 30,12:29 PM ET
| LARRY NEUMEISTER
Posted on 04/30/2002 9:54:01 PM PDT by Spar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-169 next last
1
posted on
04/30/2002 9:54:01 PM PDT
by
Spar
To: *Balkans; viadexter; vooch; Travis McGee
The judge also threw out evidence seized after Awadallah, a student at Grossmont College in El Cajon, Calif., was taken into custody on Sept. 21. The evidence included videotapes and a picture of Osama bin Laden (news - web sites). Bull!! In fact I am near violent with anger. Awadallah has noted links to the Bosnian Jihad effort. With this ruling, I am close to calling it a cover up by Clintonites to the detriment of the Bush effort to fight al-Qaeda.
Read the breaking news of this terrorist's indictment when it was posted on here: Indictment Made in 9/11 Hijack Case ``Martyrs of Bosnia''
2
posted on
04/30/2002 9:58:03 PM PDT
by
Spar
To: Spar
He "only" met him about 30 or 40 times. Barely knew the guy.
Lied about not knowing the other guy.
Let's just let him go.
Move along folks, nothing to see here.
3
posted on
04/30/2002 10:01:13 PM PDT
by
mcenedo
To: Spar
Follow the rules and you don't run into these problems. I'm angry at the "sloppy" police work.
To: Balkans; Seamole; Hamiltonian
5
posted on
04/30/2002 10:06:36 PM PDT
by
Spar
To: mcenedo; realpatriot71; Joan
Bull!! I don't buy the sloppy police work angle, especially when you have a Clinton appointed judge with a track record of covering up for the Clintonistas, ESPECIALLY WITH THE BOSNIAN JIHAD LINK!!
6
posted on
04/30/2002 10:08:48 PM PDT
by
Spar
To: Spar
U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin dismissed the indictment after concluding that Osama Awadallah, 21, was unlawfully arrested after he was taken from his San Diego home several days after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.Anybody got background on this sick scumbag, Scheindlin?
I'm guessing a Clinton appointment.
I read a report yesterday which said that more terrorist attacks are "inevitable". How would this sick judge feel if she loses family members the next time Awadallah's buddies blow up a bunch of innocents?
On the other hand, maybe her handlers were told by the CIA/DIA to cut this mouse loose so that he might lead them to the cheese. But that's probably reaching....
To: Lancey Howard
See my post #5 and #6
8
posted on
04/30/2002 10:10:09 PM PDT
by
Spar
To: Justin Raimondo
You should read this..
9
posted on
04/30/2002 10:11:52 PM PDT
by
Spar
To: realpatriot71
Follow the rules and you don't run into these problems. I'm angry at the "sloppy" police work.This "sloppy" police work came on the heels of the 9/11 attacks. Remember them? Some people at the time thought a little urgency was needed. So get real.
To: Spar
If the police had not been sloppy in the first place, then the judge could not have made the "conspiritorial" decision to toss the case. We cannot change the rules whenever we feel like it. It's a matter of principle.
To: Spar
Gotcha, thanks.
This scumbag judge Scheindlin was indeed a Clinton appointee. Surprise, surprise.
To: realpatriot71
This stinks to high heaven. From the FBI on up.
13
posted on
04/30/2002 10:16:28 PM PDT
by
Spar
Another candidate for military tribunals.
14
posted on
04/30/2002 10:16:57 PM PDT
by
D-fendr
To: Lancey Howard
This "sloppy" police work came on the heels of the 9/11 attacks.
I guess that makes it "ok" then, huh? My bad . . .
Do you want a judicial system where rules are followed or some sort of puppet court like you see in China and Cuba. It's a matter of principle. Some aren't mature enough to understand this
To: Spar
Simple solution. Declare the scum a Military detainee and ship him to GITMO. Many have ask why we need the military tribunals. This is the first example of why. The 15 minute attention span of the American public is kicking in and now we will see these "people" let go or acquitted by OJ juries.
To: realpatriot71
So, as bodies are being pulled from the rubble of a massive terrorist attack, and people across the country are grim-faced with anxiety and anticipation about when and where the next attacks would occur, and anthrax is all over the news, etc., you would be dicking around crossing ' t 's and dotting ' i 's. You are a fool, and I am certainly glad that my family's safety doesn't depend on you or your ilk.
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: Lancey Howard
You are a fool
Ah yes, the ad hominem straw man fallacy, used to avoid coming up with a reasoned an logical rebuttal to my principled position . . . classic!
I am certainly glad that my family's safety doesn't depend on you or your ilk.
As well, I am glad my family's right to a fair trial (an extension of the inalienable right of self-defense), following set Constittutional principles is not dependant on your statist ilk.
Good day :-)
To: realpatriot71
Tell it to the 3,000 victims of 9/11 who didn't get a "fair trial".
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-169 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson