Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seven States Failing to Protect 'Right to Keep and Bear Arms,' Says Lawyer
CNSNews.com ^ | April 26, 2002 | Jim Burns

Posted on 04/26/2002 2:54:43 PM PDT by Stand Watch Listen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Conservative til I die; roscoe
I was under the impression that Amendments prohibiting something to the Federals also applied down to the States

They were only restrictions on the powers delegated to the federal government.
There has been a selective judicial "incorporation" of portions of the BOR through the 14th Amendment. - roscoe -

As you can see, roscoe has a curious 'selective' vision of the bill of rights. He wants states to have the ability to ignore them, for his own strange undefined reasons.

-- He doesn't believe that governments do not have the power to -- "deprive any person of life, liberty, and property without due process of law."

Incredibly, he denies his own constitution.

21 posted on 04/27/2002 3:46:28 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
"But it is universally understood, it is a part of the history of the day, that the great revolution which established the constitution of the United States, was not effected without immense opposition. Serious fears were extensively entertained that those powers which the patriot statesmen, who then watched over the interests of our country, deemed essential to union, and to the attainment of those invaluable objects for which union was sought, might be exercised in a manner dangerous to liberty. In almost every convention by which the constitution was adopted, amendments to guard against the abuse of power were recommended. These amendments demanded security against the apprehended encroachments of the general government--not against those of the local governments." -Barron v. Baltimore, 7 Pet. 243 (1833)

"The Second Amendment declares that it shall not be infringed, but this, as has been seen, means no more than that it shall not be infringed by Congress." - US Supreme Court, United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876), Presser v. State of Illinois, 116 U.S. 252 (1886)

You're never too old to learn.
22 posted on 04/27/2002 6:41:17 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Do your idiotic reposts of inane quotes ever cease? Whatta weirdo you are roscoe.
23 posted on 04/27/2002 7:22:35 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Facts are to the willfully ignorant like garlic is to vampires.
24 posted on 04/27/2002 8:09:19 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
The inane 'facts' you keep reposting do not change the REAL fact that the BOR's applies to federal, local & state governments.

The constitution is the "Law of the Land". [see article VI.]

25 posted on 04/28/2002 8:15:39 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson