Posted on 04/17/2002 9:12:46 PM PDT by glorygirl
From weegee's link to the Houston Chronicle.
Ain't the knowledge that among the feral-gummint's guardians of Our Individual Liberty -- Our Beloved FRaternal Republic's Founding Principle -- "seniority" and the Peter Principle enjoy such a close relationship.
We may all sleep better tonight knowing that Our Liberty is in such hands!
Note Charles Grassley's comments in this article.
But Defenbaugh like many other corrupt (my opinion) FBI bureaucrats (Freeh, Potts, Shapirop, Kennedy, COulson) gets to ride into the sunset with pension and perks fully in tact and no jail time-his reward for carrying out coverups for the FBI and DOJ and WHite House.
or again,
The "national model" that was functioning at its Defenbaugh best on September 11 2001.
God save Our Beloved FRaternal Republic FRom the effect of the own-arse-covering Peter-Principled protectors of Our Founding Principle, eh?
PS: What did Charley Grassley say? Post it please?
"U.S. Sen. Charles Grassley, a frequent FBI critic who has pushed for tough discipline in the McVeigh papers case, said Agent Defenbaugh has been allowed to "get out the exit door before the curtain falls.""Director Mueller is making a serious effort to reform the FBI, and I appreciate his work," Mr. Grassley said in a prepared statement. "However, much remains to be done to ensure that senior FBI officials are held accountable to the same standards as the rank-and-file agents."
Former colleagues of Agent Defenbaugh in Dallas and elsewhere said they feared his unexpected retirement might have been unfairly linked to the politics currently surrounding the bureau. "
Since no disciplinary action has been meted out, the FBI continues to show their arrogance. Not only are they above the law, they ignore their own IG's recommendations. Sheesh!
Isn't this like asking Clinton to reform the Catholic Church?
Mueller also came under some criticism in 1992 by Sen. Christopher Dodd (D.-CT), then Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Dodd's office was looking at Mueller for having shredded documents linking senior Reagan-Bush officials to illicit transactions involving BCCI and the personal profiteering of Republicans close to the Bush Regime in schemes financed by BCCI.
The report said most of the mislaid or destroyed paperwork contained no significant or new information for McVeigh's defense team.
if "most" paper work contained "no" significant information, then could you assume "some" paperwork contained "some" significant information?
However, it acknowledged that the lengthy investigation did not determine whether all destroyed documents had been disclosed.
what was the point of the whole deal if "investigation did not determine whether all destroyed documents had been disclosed"??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.