Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Tax on a Tax' Slams Middle Class
Fox News ^ | Monday, April 08, 2002 | By Steve Centanni

Posted on 04/15/2002 1:40:23 PM PDT by vannrox

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:33:14 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
...TImely alert.
1 posted on 04/15/2002 1:40:23 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: vannrox

3 posted on 04/15/2002 1:45:29 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Do any of you Status Quo Junkies still want to defend our current System of Taxation?
4 posted on 04/15/2002 1:47:26 PM PDT by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destructor

5 posted on 04/15/2002 1:51:28 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: taxman
ping
6 posted on 04/15/2002 1:54:42 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: vannrox
The hard and fast rule is- if you exercise an option, sell the stock. The two things should go together. Many people didn't realize how important that is.
8 posted on 04/15/2002 1:58:29 PM PDT by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel
Maybe its just me, but I just don't feel sorry for all those whinny-yuppies whom didn't bother to get any tax advice on their multi-million dollar stock option grants from the comapny and now want everyone to feel sorry for them now that the stock did not continue to go skyward for them. Except in a very few cases, were employees were granted options and not allowed to sell them were these problems anyones but their own. Too bad I say...I lost money in the stock market too; I ain't looking for a handout from the government to make me whole again...
9 posted on 04/15/2002 1:59:41 PM PDT by freeper12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Congress has introduced several bills to fix or repeal the AMT, but the legislation is going nowhere because, some say, it would simply cost the government too much. Over the next decade, the AMT is expected to rake in more than a half a trillion dollars for the U.S. Treasury.

It appears that Hugo Chavez is the head of this govt as well. Repealing the AMT is a no-brainer. Congress has the heart of a thief. It a tax increase already laid in.

10 posted on 04/15/2002 2:01:01 PM PDT by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Here's a question. Our brokerage firm is now charging $20 each quarter for "inactivity." This means that if we either have below $5,000 in our account, or if we have less than four trades per quarter, we are charged $20. I saw nothing on Turbo Tax about this. This year, our inactivity fee will be much larger than the interest earned. Is this deductible?
11 posted on 04/15/2002 2:02:51 PM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freeper12
There was a big to-do over this in Silicon Valley in 2001. There were hundreds of techsters that exercised their stock during 2000, and then held on to it. Their brilliant strategy was to hold it for a year and a day, and turn their gains into long-term gains at 20%, and use the extra cash to pay their tax bill.

We all know how that turned out! Zoe Lofgren had her photo opps with teary-eyed techsters. Once she realized that she could no longer get any more campaign contributions from these folks, she disappeared from the scene, fast!!!

12 posted on 04/15/2002 2:10:48 PM PDT by Night Hides Not
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: *Taxreform

13 posted on 04/15/2002 2:31:43 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
I figured out (from another newspaper article about this) that in a few years my husband and I will be hit with the AMT. In our case, it has nothing to do with stock (we buy stock but so far have never sold it), but actually because we are now expecting our 3rd child. I always thought having more children was GOOD for tax purposes.
14 posted on 04/15/2002 3:17:44 PM PDT by olivia3boys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
Investment expenses other than interest are deductible as a miscellaneous itemized deduction subject to a reduction for total miscellaneous itemized deductions of two percent of adjusted gross income (Code Secs 212 and 67). Investment interest is deductible to the extent of net investment income, with any excess carried forward to the next tax year (Code Sec. 163).
15 posted on 04/15/2002 3:24:44 PM PDT by TheCPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ex con

16 posted on 04/15/2002 3:38:41 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ex con

17 posted on 04/15/2002 3:40:44 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dialup Llama

18 posted on 04/15/2002 3:43:09 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freeper12

19 posted on 04/15/2002 3:49:35 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson