Skip to comments.
Church of Nativity Damaged and a Monastery Is Scorched
New York Times ^
| 4/09/02
| DAVID ROHDE
Posted on 04/08/2002 11:15:16 PM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
1
posted on
04/08/2002 11:15:17 PM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
With a bit of trepedition and putting on my flame resistant suit, as an individual Christian, the Church of the Nativity is just a building. While it may have some possible historic meaning, its survival has absolutely no significance to the Body of Christ, i.e. the speading of the Gospel and the fellowship of believers. The Church is not a building.
To: kattracks
places are not holy. buildings are not holy. does this writer even know any christians?
And what dumb chrsitian would allow terrorists to take sanctuary in their church?
3
posted on
04/08/2002 11:30:13 PM PDT
by
GeronL
To: connectthedots
4
posted on
04/08/2002 11:30:54 PM PDT
by
GeronL
To: GeronL
And what dumb chrsitian would allow terrorists to take sanctuary in their church? I don't think they had a choice in the matter.
5
posted on
04/08/2002 11:32:37 PM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Archbishop Pietro Sanbi, the Vatican envoy to Israel, has told the Israeli authorities that respect for holy sites is an integral part of agreements with Israelis and Palestinians. Then I guess the Vatican is strongly on the side of Israel considering the history of the Palistinians, and Arabs in general with treating the holy places of other religions.
6
posted on
04/08/2002 11:32:43 PM PDT
by
JSteff
To: kattracks
They didn't have to stay. They didn't have to do phone interviews defending the Palestinians.
7
posted on
04/08/2002 11:36:04 PM PDT
by
GeronL
To: JSteff
Did he tell Arafat that respect for holy sites means Palestinians should not be invading churches??
8
posted on
04/08/2002 11:37:36 PM PDT
by
GeronL
To: GeronL
Some of them are doing phone interviews, true, but according to reports from the priests who were released, they were hostages.
9
posted on
04/08/2002 11:38:01 PM PDT
by
kattracks
To: connectthedots
The Church is not a building. That sadly is true only to religions other than Islam. Their behavior towards the places of religious history and meaning to other religions is abysmal. What they have done and are doing has meaning to them in what they are trying to say to people of other faiths. So I don't think it is something to be ignored or taken lightly.
10
posted on
04/08/2002 11:38:03 PM PDT
by
JSteff
To: GeronL
Once upon a time this would of launched 1000 ships
To: kattracks
It is a source of continuing discouragement to me that so many Americans, including some Christians, are so ignorant as to imagine that Christianity does not have any holy places or buildings, or that the Church of the Nativity and other important holy places are "just brick and mortar," etc.
People who are that ill-traveled and that unaware of the history of Christianity and the world, should just shut up. They are only displaying their lack of knowledge. Christians have thousands of important holy places throughout the world, but the ones in and around Israel and Jerusalem are by far the holiest of all.
MR SHARON, TEAR DOWN DOME OF ROCK TODAY!
12
posted on
04/08/2002 11:38:54 PM PDT
by
crystalk
To: Governor StrangeReno
1000 ships??
do you realize the navy has been cut drastically in the past 11-12 years? =o)
13
posted on
04/08/2002 11:48:01 PM PDT
by
GeronL
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: GeronL
You know about 500 years ago when Yurop was Christian
To: Governor StrangeReno
The so-called Crusades??
Which were defensive, they wanted to stop the invasion of Europe by Islam. Islam got all the way to Albania I guess...
Now they have gotten into Europe
16
posted on
04/09/2002 12:00:08 AM PDT
by
GeronL
To: crystalk
You tell 'em. Great post.
To: GeronL
Unfortunately you need a really good stink to get a good leader...ones coming,but I dont think theres too much left in the Western world worthy of leading-with a whimper not a bang-just like Rome
To: connectthedots
This is the difference between Christianity and Islam. The Muslims would go berserk if the Israelis occupied their Dome of the Crock. We Christians just go ho hum. Some even blame the Israelis even though it is some Palestinian pieces of crap that holed themselves up in the church.
To: Birdwatcher
They shouldn't occupy the dome, they should have it moved like London Bridge, or more quickly like the swastika on the reich chancellery in 1945.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson