Posted on 03/26/2002 9:50:26 PM PST by Buffalo Bob
Hehehe…What a load of crap, show me one time an animal has committed/submitted to sodomy.
Kinda. Sometimes, it's also about love, too. And that's what everyone's looking for, when you get right down to it.
Yep, sometimes it’s about love of animals or relatives in a committed, monogamous, consensual, age appropriate loving relationship that some look for, kinda sometimes.
Fine. Then let genetics determine whether a person is homo- or hetro-, but leave our young children alone and quit forcing the gay agenda in our public schools!! Second graders do not need to be told about anal sex, or that sex between persons of the same gender is normal.
Like I said, what a load of crap. Perhaps you can highlight the pertinent clauses that constitute the sodomy part, it didn’t happen in the article and it doesn’t happen in nature. Only human beings commit sodomy. Some people pretend an anus is a vagina, sadly the only things they can create are dirt babies.
Anyway, ready and waiting with high boots and towel in hand.
Sarcasm noted.
No sarcasm here, perversion is perversion, there are no distinguishing differences in status between bestiality, incest and perversion. NONE!
While I may have the age group wrong about children being taught about anal sex and that it is acceptable, I recall reading that the goal of activist homosexuals is to target young children -- who as yet don't have a clue as to their personal sexuality.
What I spoke of about equal rights includes the premise that I have no right to force an agenda on any school that would, say ... encourage an atmosphere wherein sex between two ten-year-olds of any gender would be acceptable.
The acceptance of NAMBLA among the gay community has done you a misservice, for it accepts the premise that sex between a man and a child is normal. I can guarantee you that if any man had subjected my son to such perversions, he would be dead!! Forget the courts.
Your consistent defense of the homosexuals' questionable right to impose their agenda on innocent school children forces me to question your position.
I didn’t at all, again, where is the sodomy part?
Ah well. I guess I can't make you read and comprehend.
No need but let me help you comprehend what was thought to be simple request a four year old could follow, I asked you to highlight (that means use those little quote [“] thingys) the act of sodomy.
Dig in, guy. (Comprehension sold separately)
Please, not another wild Goose chase, just quote and reference the parts where actual “sodomy” transpired.
And yet, strangely, you separate "perversion" from bestiality and incest. Care to rephrase?
Not really, do you need a clarification?
Is masturbation a perversion? Is heterosexual oral sex perversion? Is any behavior other than missionary-position a perversion? Let's break it down.
Err…No, No, No and sure if your ADD tangent won’t take up too much time. But if you can just focus for a second, maybe go take your Ritalin first, would you mind responding to my point that incest, bestiality and perversion are equal in status? Thanks sweet heart.
Listen, if you’re going to make a claim it’s customary for you to back it up, not vice versa. And since you can’t prove Penguin sodomy, after claiming you could, I suspect reading your book will be yet another red herring. (He shoots, he scores!)
The onus is on you to define "perversion", dude.
No problem dude.
Main Entry: per·ver·sion
Function: noun
Date: 14th century
1 : the action of perverting : the condition of
being perverted
2 : a perverted form; especially : an aberrant
sexual practice especially when habitual and preferred to normal coitus
I will say that if oral sex is OK for straights, it's OK for gays, though.
Thanks this helps make my point. Since Incest, Bestiality, and Perversion are equal in status, you must agree with this because twice you’ve chosen not to challenge this fact, (re: oral sex) “it’s OK” for incestuals and bestials, “though”. Don’t ya think?
But anyway, I've got a promise to keep if I want to keep my rep as a gentleman (ask Khepera and Cultural Jihad), so I won't be coming back, hon. Adios.
Hehehe…a ”gentleman” doesn’t promote filth and degradation, I wish you could be a “gentleman.”
Glutton for punishment hey? Actually your reputation (or lack of integrity) for “last posts” are quite well known for Khepera and CJ, I wouldn’t expect anything less. However I do understand when someone’s been made to look so silly it’s understandable to have the need to repair themselves.
Nothin' but net.
Nothing is right. Again and again I’ve asked you to “quote” the passage where the Penguins preformed the act of sodomy. The invitation is still open should you care to cite the text, a task a first grader could perform.
Hardly. Check your postings.
I have and see that you are still the attention-challenged Peepee (People for Perversion) we all know and love.
You say "perversion is perversion is perversion" and the very next breath distinguish Perversion from Incest and Bestiality. So I ask you to define Perversion. But your dictionary definition brings us no closer to this task. It is too vague, you see?
No, not really. You see it was a cruel joke because they’re all the same and obviously not “too vague” because you knew exactly what I was talking about with your next sentence. ==> And I don't think homosexualtiy, incest and bestiality are equal, Tehe Tehe…
so jot that down so you won't forget.
Oh I will, right along side your pithy argument that says….Umm…Wait a minute, that’s not fair, you don’t have an argument, pithy or not. Darn! I do want you to defend why you “don't think homosexualtiy, incest and bestiality are equal.” I jumped through your arbitrary hoops and defined it, don’t you have the intellectual capacity/integrity to defend why they’re not of equal status? So, can we wrap this up? No, no, no, please let’s discuss this point? I do so want to jot it down!
I really must get back to my promise.
Sorry, promises are for Gentlemen because they’re meant to be kept, both things you’ve failed at miserably.
Ugg…Well I guess I deserved that, I asked three times for specific quotes and you had to reprint half the article. Do you have this trouble taking direction from your teachers at school, they can hold you back a year for that, you know dude?
I can also glean the fact that you do not have the mental acuity to discern differences and subtleties in various sexual behaviors.
I do, and all three, Homosexuality included, meet the definition as I have presented. Please tell me where I’m wrong. The are no distinguishing differences in status, please show me my error.
One of these three involves consenting adults.
Nope wrong, all involve consenting adults. I did say age appropriate if you want to check.
One of these three could involve consenting adults or non-consenting children.
No really, if you could reread you’d see I clearly said age appropriate, don’t be so dim.
One of these three exploits non-sentient and therefore non-consenting creatures.
Exploitation would involve harm, where’s the harm? Further the creature is fully conscious (sentient) of the act as it’s objectively present and a willing participant. All animals give consent each and every time it allows you to approach much less touch it, we know this because of its flight, kick, bite gore, etc. responses. Do you disagree?
One of these three is a global social taboo against the disruption of familial politics and dynamics.
What are you saying, ones immoral and the other isn’t? Hehehe… Is that the best you can do? Hehehe…Why is it immoral, which ever one you’re talking about it is? What disruption are you talking about? Hehehe…
And one of these three has had a long and natural history in every single human society since the dawn of time, has been celebrated at times as a noble love and routine human sexual expression in various ancient cultures such as Shoganate Japan, Greece, Sumeria, Egypt, Native American and South Pacific cultures, has been at times been harshly forbidden to promote procreation and breeding for the advancement of societies' populations, and has anywhere from 1% - 10% of the current population as practitioners who will not be silenced, supressed or made to feel shameful about practicing it anymore.
I’m honestly lost, are you speaking to the incest, bestiality or homosexuality on this one? I guess they all could fit neatly in the same metaphor. Anyway how does this statement, to whom ever it ambiguously applies to, settle the question of equality of status? Honestly, this last statement sounds like a sad cry for help for the filth and degradation someone has inflicted upon himself.
Can you figure out which is which and if they are equal or not?
Well no and yes. They are indistinguishable as far as the acts themselves but appear to all be equal in status, is that the answer you were looking for? You really only posed one important issue and that was of consent, I believe I neatly addressed that but would be happy to expand on any specific points if you need to. Otherwise you seem rather lacking in any specific or coherent points, I had hoped you had more than this.
I don’t want the last word…
BTTT!!!
If I owned my own property the government wouldn't tell me who could smoke, or if I need a 50 foot concrete ramp for unexistant wheelchair activist and....
Oh, right, they already do FORCE me. Gee, so with vouchers you wouldn't be FORCED to have the homorights activist love tool shoved down your throat. If anyone believes this, butter up your butt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.