Skip to comments.
Islam Expert Claims Three 'Dirty' Nuke Bombs Now In US
World Net Daily ^
| 3/21/2002
| Staff
Posted on 03/21/2002 1:33:51 PM PST by ex-Texan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-169 next last
1
posted on
03/21/2002 1:33:51 PM PST
by
ex-Texan
To: ex-Texan
"I have Middle Eastern friends throughout the U.S. who continually feed me information as to what the terrorists are up to," Dr. Morey told ANS. "I, in turn, feed that information to the FBI and Naval Intelligence." He's lying. If he really had these contacts, he'd know that blabbing his fat mouth to WND would get his friends killed.
2
posted on
03/21/2002 1:38:39 PM PST
by
r9etb
To: ex-Texan
three....give me a break! They would have gone off by now.
To: ex-Texan
If it's being driven around, any citizen with a $100 giger counter could detect it as it passes by. Not to mention the feds with better equipment.
If it's shielded, the truck would be riding mighty low.
4
posted on
03/21/2002 1:39:24 PM PST
by
js1138
To: ex-Texan
Why would they not have used them by now if they were here? Why stockpile them here if you wont use them?
5
posted on
03/21/2002 1:39:38 PM PST
by
finnman69
To: js1138
Dirty nukes could be smuggled in the bottoms of cargo vessles and be sitting in the middle of any U.S. harbor right now. Or, they could be shielded and hidden in any container shipment on our rail roads.
I think this person might have some credibility. And, he might soon turn up dead in a freeway accident.
6
posted on
03/21/2002 1:42:58 PM PST
by
ex-Texan
To: ex-Texan
"Hamas has me on a death list of people to assassinate in the U.S.," Morey told ANS.
Is this true. This guy sounds like a second bit author with illusions of grandeur.
To: ex-Texan
To: ex-Texan
I think they would have used them before.
Regardless...here's the deal.
President Bush makes this announcement, without fanfare, maybe in a Saturday morning radio address:
Should a nuclear device go off on U.S. soil at any time, upon confirmation of detonation of said nuclear device, the city of Mecca will be targeted with a nuclear device sufficient to level it it to a level equal to the desert that surrounds it. Should a second device be detonated, Medina is next. And so forth. I doubt we will have to go further. But if we have to, we will. Oh----and we won't wait to investigate WHO set the bomb off. We'll ask those questions AFTER we have finished with Mecca and Medina.
Have a good Saturday, and God bless.
9
posted on
03/21/2002 1:46:41 PM PST
by
gg188
To: ex-Texan
I would hope the feds are monitoring obvious points like harbors. You cannot hide radiation from sophisticated detectors.
But maybe I believe in the tooth fairy.
10
posted on
03/21/2002 1:46:51 PM PST
by
js1138
To: finnman69
Hmm remember when Bin Laden made the threat.. use them on us and we'll use them on you???? Suppose our new threat on Iraq.. well if we use a nuke on Saddam.. they use a nuke on us... here's the deal... the general public in muslim countries might not like the US but using a nuke first would even cause the majority to pull back and say "this is too much"... even for hate driven people using a nuke to most is out of bounds... if we use one first in Iraq it gives Bin Laden an excuse to trigger them without getting a backlash on his home turf.
To: gg188
Mecca is a viable Nuke target IMHO. Blowing up the center of satanic religious warfare sounds like a good idea to me.
12
posted on
03/21/2002 1:48:36 PM PST
by
ex-Texan
To: ex-Texan
Recall the airport strip search soft x-ray machines? If the feds are serious they could see a dirty nuke a mile away through brick and concrete.
13
posted on
03/21/2002 1:48:44 PM PST
by
js1138
To: ChicagoRepublican
This guy sounds like a second bit author with illusions of grandeur. Yes, you are right on the money.
His books are ludicrous.
I wonder what theological seminary he supposedly graduated from.
To: ex-Texan;Larry Lied;CommiesOut
World Nut Daily further reports that they have the nukes in ankle holsters.
15
posted on
03/21/2002 1:50:44 PM PST
by
mv1
To: ex-Texan
The "dirty nuke" is nothing more than a nail bomb with radioactive junk in place of the nails. The explosion is ordinary chemical, but the radioactive junk gets spread all over the neighborhood and local residential people have to leave until it is all cleaned up.
To: ex-Texan
Perhaps the unseen, unknowable, criminal mastermind terrorists, detectable only by the Government using secret means that they cannot tell us about, are simply waiting us out.
If anything, we should have house to house searches across America. You can't be too careful. Plus we'd be alot safer if the Government stores our guns for us, so they'll probably pick those up, right around the same time. If people protest, maybe a dirty nuke will be used.
To: ex-Texan
This would certainly clarify, simplify, and truncate. If just one is detonated here I fully expect us to turn the Arab world into glow-in-the-dark glass. Would end years or decades of piece meal anti-terrorism. And subterranean oil would be largely unaffacted.
The Saudi ambassador to the US was having dinner with Jeanne Kirkpatrick.
"Ambassador Kirkpatrick, I have enjoyed my stay in the US, especially your TV shows like 'Star Trek.' But I have a question."
"What is that, Mr. Ambassador?"
"Well, on your TV spaceship there are whites, blacks, Chinese, Japanese, Jews, American Indians ... everything except Arabs. Why are there no Arabs?"
"Mr. Ambassador, you have to understand. 'Star Trek' takes place in the future..."
To: mv1
Nuke 'em Danno ! .... Ankle holster nukes are standard issue for our Special Forces now .... LOL LOL !
19
posted on
03/21/2002 1:53:17 PM PST
by
ex-Texan
To: r9etb
Thanks for the reality check.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-169 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson