Skip to comments.
Train Fire in Western India Kills 30 (2,000 MUSLIMS ATTACK TRAIN FULL OF HINDUS - MY TITLE)
YAHOO NEWS ^
| FEBRUARY 27, 2002
| HARISH DESAI
Posted on 02/27/2002 2:28:51 AM PST by Madiuq
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-157 next last
1
posted on
02/27/2002 2:28:51 AM PST
by
Madiuq
To: veronica
ping
2
posted on
02/27/2002 2:30:05 AM PST
by
Madiuq
To: Madiuq
Gotta love that headline (Yahoo's, not yours). Makes you think it was another cooking fire, like Egypt.
3
posted on
02/27/2002 2:35:45 AM PST
by
gridlock
To: Madiuq
Islam = Peace
4
posted on
02/27/2002 2:40:45 AM PST
by
Captiva
To: gridlock
They cannot headline truthfully because it is the "religion of peace" (TM)
To: Madiuq
What is the history of the site before the mosque. Did a Hindu temple occupy it previously?
To: Madiuq
The train was carrying activists belonging to a Hindu nationalist organization trying to build a temple on the site of a disputed mosque in the northern Indian state of Uttar Pradesh.
The World Hindu Council activists were returning to Gujarat after participating in religious ceremonies at Ayodhya, where Hindu nationalists plan to build a temple at the site of a 16th century Muslim mosque.
When the mosque was torn down by Hindus in 1992, it sparked nationwide riots between Hindus and Muslim and 2,000 people were killed.
Only Muslims are allowed to dynamite and raze the religious shrines, churches and synagogues of others. Then build Mosques on top of the ruins.
7
posted on
02/27/2002 2:51:07 AM PST
by
dennisw
To: Madiuq
This should be a signal for the Hindu masses to purge the Muslim threat from their soil before it's too late. To Hell with these arrogant, self rightious demons!
To: Madiuq
The Media prefers the politically correct 'Muslim Protection Program' to the truth of the matter.
. . .
9
posted on
02/27/2002 2:56:13 AM PST
by
cricket
To: HiTech RedNeck
"What is the history of the site before the mosque. Did a Hindu temple occupy it previously?" Yes, it was a Hindu temple for thousands of years before the Islamic invasions. Every single incident involving Indian Hindus tearing down Islamic Mosques have two things in common: (1) they were previously Hindu temples before Islamic jihadis tore them down; and (2) they are always in India's own country, India.
10
posted on
02/27/2002 3:06:16 AM PST
by
Madiuq
To: Madiuq
Time for India ... as well as us to pick up the pace. There is no negotiation with mad dogs.
11
posted on
02/27/2002 3:07:55 AM PST
by
mgc1122
To: dennisw
Don't you just love the way that each time the Hindus are referenced they are called "activists." But the journalist calls the mob of Muslims that set fire to the train, "2000 people."
12
posted on
02/27/2002 3:19:56 AM PST
by
dawn53
To: dawn53
I noticed, but not enough, now, thanks to you, maybe I'll notice a little better.
13
posted on
02/27/2002 3:28:35 AM PST
by
wita
To: germanicus; Madiuq; dennisw; veronica; GeronL
This should be a signal for the Hindu masses to purge the Muslim threat from their soil before it's too late. To Hell with these arrogant, self righteous demons!
But, which of India's arrogant, self righteous demons will you Sikh?
[Let Hindu is without sin cast the first stone!]
To: Madiuq
What keeps India from thrusting these "troublesome groups" out of its borders altogether?
To: dawn53; dennisw; veronica
Don't you just love the way that each time the Hindus are referenced they are called "activists." But the journalist calls the mob of Muslims that set fire to the train, "2000 people."
And love that they call the islamist Arabs' bloody NAZI butchers in Israel and the Recaptured Territories "'palestinian' militants" -- and never, G-d forbid, what they are:
BLOODY NAZI MURDERERS!
To: HiTech RedNeck
What is the history of the site before the mosque. Did a Hindu temple occupy it previously?
Some of them
claim one did, just like other Hindus claim that the Taj Mahal was actually built as a Hindu shrine (they claim the same for St. Paul's Cathedral in London, by the way). It's much like the claims by the Amerind tribes in the Kennewick Man case, that their oral histories said they were the first men here, so he was
obviously one of them, so he couldn't be studied by anthropologists.
In this incident the Moslems are clearly at fault, but in the whole Ayodhya controvery the Hindus are at least equally at fault.
-Eric
17
posted on
02/27/2002 3:37:37 AM PST
by
E Rocc
To: Madiuq
Looks like this is going to turn into a second Palestine.(Except it's Hindu's not Jews)
18
posted on
02/27/2002 3:38:26 AM PST
by
cavador
To: Brian Allen
Is that a Sikh joke? (Sikhism [term?] is a different religion from Hinduism.) Hindus' religious jealousies are restricted to their own home land. They do not launch jihads abroad.
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-157 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson