Skip to comments.
Bush Aide Karl Rove Gets Briefings on ‘Gay’ GOP Effort
Culture and Family Institute ^
| February 7, 2002
| Peter LaBarbera
Posted on 02/07/2002 5:22:23 PM PST by Double Eagle Sword of Justice
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 last
Comment #81 Removed by Moderator
Comment #82 Removed by Moderator
To: RAT Patrol
Bump!
83
posted on
02/08/2002 7:06:12 AM PST
by
EdReform
To: Double Eagle Sword of Justice
Why can't anyone answer the question RightOnline brought up with his comments? It seems to be the crux of the issue. He said homosexuality was an 'abomination' but we should welcome those who practice it as brothers in arms. I do not agree with the "abomination" language. I just think that its gross, personally. But the point is that it is a private matter that should not have any relevance to positions taken by our government. I don't believe that gays should be permitted to serve openly in the military. And I do not think homosexuality should be "taught" in schools.
But otherwise, I do not see how a person's homosexuality has any relevance to the political issues about which conservatives should care. If there is a person who is for limited government, low taxes, economic freedom, strong national defense, etc., and that person happens to be homosexual, why shouldn't I welcome that person as a comrade in the fight to move our country in the right direction? His sexuality shouldn't be an issue.
84
posted on
02/08/2002 7:08:53 AM PST
by
XJarhead
To: cutlass
You're not just dealing with 2% of the population. Like it or not, a large percentage of Christian heterosexuals find the "religious right" unappealing and base their opinions of the Republic Party on the perception that they cater to the RR. I'm not stating that as fact, mind you, but the perception is undoubtedly there. Working with responsible Gay Rights groups, even to the point where the party says, "We are willing to work alongside you on some issues, but not automatically back you on 'gay rights' themes", could do a world of good for the image of the Republican Party as a whole. Not being a member of said party, I personally couldn't care less, so please don't take this as simple wishful thinking on my part.
To: Double Eagle Sword of Justice
I know two, and only two conservative gays (and I'm from the Bay Area).
Only one voted for Bush.
All this effort for one vote?
86
posted on
02/08/2002 8:39:46 AM PST
by
Zathras
To: Double Eagle Sword of Justice
What about other things you consider an 'abomination' too?Yes, how about other biblical abominations? Should we be condemning people's enjoyment of shellfish, as well? If not, what's the difference?
87
posted on
02/08/2002 9:05:20 AM PST
by
ellery
To: GW in Ohio
Sodomites are the worst filth in this country - other than the baby killers - that straight enough for you? As to your "esoteric" - no successful country has ever allowed homosexuals to be "out" and respected - in Rome it was a death penalty offense. Republicans will not be lectured to by this splinter group - nor should they.
88
posted on
02/08/2002 10:20:01 PM PST
by
185JHP
Comment #89 Removed by Moderator
To: RAT Patrol
Good answer, RAT Patrol. I, too, have known many fine homosexuals. I hate the agenda that militant ones purport, but the individuals I've known through the antique business years ago were good people. Had a homosexual brother-in-law I loved, too. He treated me better than the rest of that family. I'm not pro-homosexual by any means but I can't bring myself to hate the ones I know.
To: GW in Ohio
Yes, and guide it into obscurity. There are Godly principles at work here which you seem to know little about. When a country obeys his commands, we prosper. When it doesn't, we don't. We need to be careful that we don't spit in His face any longer. It will be to our detriment if we continue to do so.
Comment #92 Removed by Moderator
To: GW in Ohio
GW, I could care less how uncomfortable it makes you. I'm speaking truth here and it's tough if you don't like it. God will ultimately have the last word, not you and not me. Deal with it.
To: GW in Ohio
Oh, and who said I was a republican?
Comment #95 Removed by Moderator
To: Emmylou
I don't hate homosexuals, Emmylou. I don't hate anyone--but the clintons come close. I'm only saying that I know many homosexuals and I don't hate them. Sorry if there was any confusion but I think you're making a mountain out of a molehill here.
Comment #97 Removed by Moderator
To: Emmylou
I know. The gays I've been most closely acquainted with aren't either. But they do exist, I'm afraid. I knew a few flaming gays in the antique business but they didn't bother anyone and what they did didn't hurt me personally. One did harm someone in my family and I didn't know about it until just recently. I can't even find it in my heart to hate him but I do know how dangerous some can be toward young people.
Comment #99 Removed by Moderator
To: *SASU;*BRAAD;*Homosexual Agenda
b
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson