Skip to comments.
A Philosophy Of Morality
Sierra Times ^
| Deborah Venable
Posted on 02/01/2002 7:13:38 AM PST by Sir Gawain
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-132 next last
To: OWK
Your name has come up again......
To: Khepera; wwjdn
You two have the habit of kneecapping people while they aren't there to defend themselves.
It is considered cowardly. (not to mention a bit of an obsession)
22
posted on
02/07/2002 7:51:09 AM PST
by
OWK
To: nexuslexus
Let's consider a question more germane to some of the premises implicit in the writer's essay:
To whom does your life belong? All else proceeds from the answer...
23
posted on
02/07/2002 8:04:18 AM PST
by
Noumenon
To: Khepera; wwjdn; Brad's Gramma; JMJ333; EODGUY; proud2bRC; dakmar; fiddlstix; J.R.R. Tolkien
All in the name of Tolerance. Even more, all in the name of Science.
You speak of truth and for truth, yet the people you are speaking against have re-defined truth to mean "a repeatable physical experiment." Anything else, they will argue, is subjective. Keep in mind that most have said that love is simply an electro-chemical reaction in the brain and, therefore, real. If it weren't an electro-chemical reaction in the brain they would not declare it real.
So, the fact that a certain moral standard has withstood the test of time, always working to uphold the rights of society and its memebers without fail will not make that moral standard "true" to the likes of them. In addition, the fact that every other moral standard has failed to uphold the rights of society and its members does not prove that moral standard as "true" to them.
Since they have so narrowly defined "truth", they deny your right to argue that a particular moral standard is true, and therefore worthy of support, encouragement, or enforcement on the part of society.
What we need to do is ignore them and stand on what we know. Most people won't accept this narrow definition of truth. They know which moral values are right and which are wrong. People like you and me just need to give them permission to give voice to what they know - no matter how loudly the adherants of Scientism try to shout us down.
Shalom.
24
posted on
02/07/2002 8:15:08 AM PST
by
ArGee
To: ArGee
Keep in mind that most have said that love is simply an electro-chemical reaction in the brain and, therefore, real. If it weren't an electro-chemical reaction in the brain they would not declare it real. Uhhh, without the electro-chemical reaction, there would be no "love", and thus the reality of something not experienced would be impossible to debate.
To: Khepera;OWK;Headsonpikes;FreeTally
I really, really, would prefer not to be dragged into any of this. Stopping homosexuals from forcing their lifestyle on everyone around them is something I can support, ongoing battles with FReepers having differing views is not. Thanks.
26
posted on
02/07/2002 8:19:10 AM PST
by
Dakmar
To: headsonpikes
Cowardly backstabbing alert.
To: wwjdn;Khepera
I turn away from my desk, where I am busy 'running the country', to deal with another mudball, low and outside.
I see that the great slobbering hound of obscurantism, Khepera, now has a yappy little sidekick, 'Who Wants Jack Daniels Now'.
Frankly, neither of you is amusing enough to spar with. Go away.
To: headsonpikes;khepera;wwjdn;argee
Mr. Spikes:
It has been a privilege to witness a great number of intelligent posts from Mr. Khepera and from Mr. WWJDN.
They both add a lot to the FreeRepublic forum.
As does Mr. ArGee, whom I thank for the ping to this thread.
To: ArGee
What we need to do is ignore them and stand on what we know. Most people won't accept this narrow definition of truth. They know which moral values are right and which are wrong. People like you and me just need to give them permission to give voice to what they know - no matter how loudly the adherants of Scientism try to shout us down.With that, I completely agree!
To: J.R.R. Tolkien
It has been a privilege to witness a great number of intelligent posts from Mr. Khepera and from Mr. WWJDN Where?
31
posted on
02/07/2002 9:38:25 AM PST
by
OWK
To: argee;wwjdn;khepera;spookbrat;aunt polgara;harrison bergeron;paul atreides;rdb3;freetally;OWK...
Every society must have a True North. That True North is either comprised of a) moral values and ethical principles, or of b) power centers and politically favored groups. When it comes to picking a set to write into law. I prefer set "a)", as did the framers of our United States Constitution.
To: OWK
Various pro-life threads.
To: Noumenon
Is that multiple choice?
A. The state
B. You
C. God
D. Whoever can control it
E. None of the above
34
posted on
02/07/2002 9:48:51 AM PST
by
Pistias
To: J.R.R. Tolkien
Mr. "True North".
If you've detected intelligence from that source, I think aliens are messing with your personal magnetic field; adjust tinfoil helmet.
Shake your compass.
To: Pistias
Is that multiple choice? Nope - it's an essay question.
36
posted on
02/07/2002 10:05:30 AM PST
by
Noumenon
To: Noumenon
Dammit! I was hoping I could get away with the clock method...
37
posted on
02/07/2002 10:08:53 AM PST
by
Pistias
To: Sir Gawain
To: headsonpikes
Uh, if we don't build laws on ethical principles, what do we build them on?
39
posted on
02/07/2002 10:10:11 AM PST
by
Pistias
To: Pistias
Uh, this isn't a school project, not a hypothetical 'virtual world' simulation.
In fact, laws are built the old-fashioned way, on a foundation of 'interest'.
That's why it's important to keep politicians and lawyers on a short leash; they'll ALWAYS run with whatever power EXISTS.
No idealists they. ;^)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-132 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson