Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Philosophy Of Morality
Sierra Times ^ | Deborah Venable

Posted on 02/01/2002 7:13:38 AM PST by Sir Gawain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
To: OWK
Your name has come up again......
21 posted on 02/07/2002 7:46:40 AM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Khepera; wwjdn
You two have the habit of kneecapping people while they aren't there to defend themselves.

It is considered cowardly. (not to mention a bit of an obsession)

22 posted on 02/07/2002 7:51:09 AM PST by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nexuslexus
Let's consider a question more germane to some of the premises implicit in the writer's essay:

To whom does your life belong? All else proceeds from the answer...

23 posted on 02/07/2002 8:04:18 AM PST by Noumenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Khepera; wwjdn; Brad's Gramma; JMJ333; EODGUY; proud2bRC; dakmar; fiddlstix; J.R.R. Tolkien
All in the name of Tolerance.

Even more, all in the name of Science.

You speak of truth and for truth, yet the people you are speaking against have re-defined truth to mean "a repeatable physical experiment." Anything else, they will argue, is subjective. Keep in mind that most have said that love is simply an electro-chemical reaction in the brain and, therefore, real. If it weren't an electro-chemical reaction in the brain they would not declare it real.

So, the fact that a certain moral standard has withstood the test of time, always working to uphold the rights of society and its memebers without fail will not make that moral standard "true" to the likes of them. In addition, the fact that every other moral standard has failed to uphold the rights of society and its members does not prove that moral standard as "true" to them.

Since they have so narrowly defined "truth", they deny your right to argue that a particular moral standard is true, and therefore worthy of support, encouragement, or enforcement on the part of society.

What we need to do is ignore them and stand on what we know. Most people won't accept this narrow definition of truth. They know which moral values are right and which are wrong. People like you and me just need to give them permission to give voice to what they know - no matter how loudly the adherants of Scientism try to shout us down.

Shalom.

24 posted on 02/07/2002 8:15:08 AM PST by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ArGee
Keep in mind that most have said that love is simply an electro-chemical reaction in the brain and, therefore, real. If it weren't an electro-chemical reaction in the brain they would not declare it real.

Uhhh, without the electro-chemical reaction, there would be no "love", and thus the reality of something not experienced would be impossible to debate.

25 posted on 02/07/2002 8:18:53 AM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Khepera;OWK;Headsonpikes;FreeTally
I really, really, would prefer not to be dragged into any of this. Stopping homosexuals from forcing their lifestyle on everyone around them is something I can support, ongoing battles with FReepers having differing views is not. Thanks.
26 posted on 02/07/2002 8:19:10 AM PST by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
Cowardly backstabbing alert.
27 posted on 02/07/2002 8:20:10 AM PST by MadameAxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wwjdn;Khepera
I turn away from my desk, where I am busy 'running the country', to deal with another mudball, low and outside.

I see that the great slobbering hound of obscurantism, Khepera, now has a yappy little sidekick, 'Who Wants Jack Daniels Now'.

Frankly, neither of you is amusing enough to spar with. Go away.

28 posted on 02/07/2002 8:42:52 AM PST by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes;khepera;wwjdn;argee
Mr. Spikes:

It has been a privilege to witness a great number of intelligent posts from Mr. Khepera and from Mr. WWJDN.

They both add a lot to the FreeRepublic forum.

As does Mr. ArGee, whom I thank for the ping to this thread.


29 posted on 02/07/2002 9:32:26 AM PST by J.R.R. Tolkien
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ArGee
What we need to do is ignore them and stand on what we know. Most people won't accept this narrow definition of truth. They know which moral values are right and which are wrong. People like you and me just need to give them permission to give voice to what they know - no matter how loudly the adherants of Scientism try to shout us down.

With that, I completely agree!

30 posted on 02/07/2002 9:35:01 AM PST by J.R.R. Tolkien
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: J.R.R. Tolkien
It has been a privilege to witness a great number of intelligent posts from Mr. Khepera and from Mr. WWJDN

Where?

31 posted on 02/07/2002 9:38:25 AM PST by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: argee;wwjdn;khepera;spookbrat;aunt polgara;harrison bergeron;paul atreides;rdb3;freetally;OWK...
Every society must have a True North. That True North is either comprised of a) moral values and ethical principles, or of b) power centers and politically favored groups. When it comes to picking a set to write into law. I prefer set "a)", as did the framers of our United States Constitution.
32 posted on 02/07/2002 9:42:24 AM PST by J.R.R. Tolkien
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: OWK
Various pro-life threads.
33 posted on 02/07/2002 9:43:00 AM PST by J.R.R. Tolkien
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon
Is that multiple choice?

A. The state
B. You
C. God
D. Whoever can control it
E. None of the above

34 posted on 02/07/2002 9:48:51 AM PST by Pistias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: J.R.R. Tolkien
Mr. "True North".

If you've detected intelligence from that source, I think aliens are messing with your personal magnetic field; adjust tinfoil helmet.

Shake your compass.

35 posted on 02/07/2002 9:52:01 AM PST by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Pistias
Is that multiple choice?

Nope - it's an essay question.

36 posted on 02/07/2002 10:05:30 AM PST by Noumenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon
Dammit! I was hoping I could get away with the clock method...
37 posted on 02/07/2002 10:08:53 AM PST by Pistias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Once again, we are trapped by NAFTA chapter 11 rules

GIANT SUCKING SOUND


38 posted on 02/07/2002 10:09:39 AM PST by let freedom sing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
Uh, if we don't build laws on ethical principles, what do we build them on?
39 posted on 02/07/2002 10:10:11 AM PST by Pistias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Pistias
Uh, this isn't a school project, not a hypothetical 'virtual world' simulation.

In fact, laws are built the old-fashioned way, on a foundation of 'interest'.

That's why it's important to keep politicians and lawyers on a short leash; they'll ALWAYS run with whatever power EXISTS.

No idealists they. ;^)

40 posted on 02/07/2002 10:23:35 AM PST by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson