Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mystery of monster waves solved
Electronic Telegraph ^ | January 6, 2002 | By Tony Paterson in Berlin

Posted on 01/05/2002 6:49:34 PM PST by aculeus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last
To: holman
About 6 years ago I was able to tour the Carl Vinson. The petty officer in charge of the anchors told me that on their last tour she took blue water over the flight deck. The deck is 95 feet over the water when fully loaded. Musta been one heck of a ride.
21 posted on 01/05/2002 7:25:51 PM PST by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot
LOL!
22 posted on 01/05/2002 7:26:38 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot
My God! Is that an old shot of Rush in drag?
23 posted on 01/05/2002 7:26:50 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
The Soviets/CIS have a torpedo that supposedly bursts underneath an aircraft carrier to create a 'keel-breaking' gap effect. One of the CIS sold some to the Chinese...

Recall a story about the QE2 being hit bow on one night by a wave created by a hurricane hundreds of miles away. I think they said the height was 90 feet, given the fact that it hit the bridge.

Miraculously, no one was on deck at the time, before, or after. Of course, some things were missing, others things bent.

24 posted on 01/05/2002 7:29:08 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
"Yet until now scientists and oceanographers had been unable to determine exactly what formed such gigantic "one-off" seas that are capable of breaking a 600ft-long ship in half and sending it to the bottom within seconds. "

NUTS! I read about concoidal-rogue waves in Scientific American back in the 1970's.

25 posted on 01/05/2002 7:31:19 PM PST by beerhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot
Is that Rosie O'Donnell???
26 posted on 01/05/2002 7:34:22 PM PST by WriteOn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness
I would be happy to never see a wave over 20' high ever in my life.

Before this new theory came out, I always worried about the fast storm which changes the wind direction radically in 10-20 hours, leaving a set of (say) 30 foot waves crossing a set of 20' waves at about 90*, creating big crazy waves and super deep troughs with no warning. "Fastnet Force Ten" from 1979 or the "Queen Anne's Storm" between NZ and Fiji a few years ago are two famous examples we have read about.

27 posted on 01/05/2002 7:35:56 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
I wouldn't even have thought a total of 200 ships would've sunk in the past 20 years!

MM

28 posted on 01/05/2002 7:37:56 PM PST by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot
Ok, so I was drinking a'bit, and we went out to my car for a while, but seriously, she's a very nice.
29 posted on 01/05/2002 7:41:49 PM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: unix
I saw some amazing sh*t on LSD, too.

But no waves.

30 posted on 01/05/2002 7:43:23 PM PST by Yeti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Wave theory always seemed so common sense. Waves building on waves. Any sailor has seen this happen at least on a small scale. I have been in calm open sea and have watched a 30 foot swell travel across from no where, and have been in 15 foot swells when a single 20-30 foot breaker washes by.
31 posted on 01/05/2002 7:45:18 PM PST by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Interesting that this comes on the heels of a recent article offering a mathematical explanation for why buses seem to arrive in clumps rather than evenly spaced. The explanation was that, if a bus ever had any reason to slow down, then additional passengers would accumulate at stops in front of it so that it would slow down even more at each successive stop. Furthermore, the gap between this bus and the one behind it would decrease so that the second bus would see fewer passengers at each stop. Hence the second bus would start accelerating at the same time that the first bus was slowing down, until the two buses were practically on top of each other.

A similar thing must happen with waves.

32 posted on 01/05/2002 7:45:44 PM PST by AZLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yeti
Hehe...I always laugh when I think the Navy named a class of ship LSD...
33 posted on 01/05/2002 7:46:22 PM PST by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Sailed from MA to Gibraltar on a 44' sailboat this past summer ... my seventh trans-Atlantic crossing. All the other crossings were on US Navy ships. I've survived gale force winds and one hurricane while at sea ... and fortunately have been spared a so called "killer wave". All of the major storms I've experienced at sea were on large ships.
Thank you Lord.
34 posted on 01/05/2002 7:46:27 PM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
I don't know about the numbers. But giant waves sinking ships (not without a trace), has been well documented. I find the whole thing fascinating for some reason.
35 posted on 01/05/2002 7:50:28 PM PST by goodieD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
I agree. Waves worry me less than opposing lows banging in to each other and gaining strength.

I was out on the Chesapeake last week and the measly 5 footers were kicking our ass.

Remember that Bay chop? It's still there.

36 posted on 01/05/2002 7:51:56 PM PST by nunya bidness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
I would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for those meddling kids.
37 posted on 01/05/2002 7:57:47 PM PST by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodieD
Years ago there was a story in NY Times magazine about a marine insurance investigator who was hired to find out what happened to some very large bulk carriers. Turned out the bottoms were too weak( thin ) and it was later thought they unzipped in ten seconds or so. Not enough time to get a broadcast out. Had nothing to do with weather. Was a function of thin steel and corrosive cargo in the holds mixing with saltwater. The boats were only 2-3 years old and it happened to 2-3 of a class. No survivors.
38 posted on 01/05/2002 8:00:54 PM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: unix
200 miles off of Hatteras on a 67' aluminum ketch, we hit a container in a nasty white squall and sunk 30 hours later.

The Coasties pulled us off after trying to tow the boat.

39 posted on 01/05/2002 8:01:43 PM PST by nunya bidness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ofMagog
I saw this on cable awhile back.
40 posted on 01/05/2002 8:02:00 PM PST by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson