Posted on 01/05/2002 4:37:59 AM PST by CrossCheck
That's your perogative.
I stand by my characterization of this group, and am content to let the observers decide for themselves.
However, be our guest and post the Cr@p from these two left wing/maggot infested liberal agenda pushers. You will have a great fan club among FRers who are not conservatives!
I think that those of you who post these left wing agenda pushers will find out that you are trying to push their BS uphill on FR in 2002! Just remember the laws of gravity when you post their BS! We will be increasing the uphill grade when this trash is posted as conservative wisdom when it is left wing agenda pushing!
Maybe that's just me.
This July, the United Nations will hold a conference on how to reduce this global plague.
Please help us spread the word about the conference and the impact gun violence has on communities across the United States.
When: Any time before 30 June 2001
What: Collect and display images that show the human impact of gun violence
Why: To humanize the conference and attract media attention
Where: Wherever you are, all around the world
All aboard, sign me up!! Let's all pull together for the UN!!
Like I said.....
Since 1990, the United States has exported more than 152 billion dollars worth of weaponry to states around the world. The U.S. dominates this international arms market, supplying over half of all arms exports in 1999, four times more than the second largest supplier. U.S. weapons sales help outfit non-democratic regimes, soldiers who commit gross human rights abuses against their citizens and citizens of other countries, and forces in instable regions on the verge of, middle of, or recovering from conflict.
U.S.-origin weapons find their way into conflicts the world over. The United States supplied arms or military technology to more than 92% of the conflicts under way in 1999. The costs to the families and communities afflicted by this violence is immeasurable. But to most arms dealers, the profit accumulated outweighs the lives lost. In the 1990's, over 65% of world arms deliveries were sold or given to developing nations, where lingering conflicts or societal violence can scare away potential investors.
But it has been my experience that the best way to reason with a fellow Christian is to use our most credible source, the Bible ----- and likewise, it seems to me that the best way to reason with "blame America first" liberals is to use their very own favorite sources, including F.A.S. - along with unbiased raw data sources. Just my two cents...
So they may criticize China from time to time, that sort of thing, clever folks will use tactics of that nature to lend credence to other statements and arguments, which probably is more representative as to their real goals and aims. These people are not stupid, that is readily apparent.
Remember that the "best" lies are usually those that have a grain of truth to them. You'll find that in Scripture also.
Over and out.
If you read the Downside Legacy, you'll see that the excerpts taken from the F.A.S. deal mostly with transcripts of hearings, historical notes and statistics - and not opinions!
Hey, mind if I borrow that one sometime?
The word for the day is C-A-U-T-I-O-N when dealing with certain organizations.
In regards to the NYT, if they printed the Declaration of Independence, I would feel compelled to check for any changes in wording made to it by them.
Shoot, if they told me the sun was shining, I would have to go look for myself just to be sure.
Fine, then.
Maybe you like gun grabbing, UN promoting, pro-aborts without an agenda.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.