Agriculture chief upholds management plan for 11.5 million acres of Sierra

The Sierra Times ^ | 27 December, 2001 | JIM WASSERMAN Associated Press Writer

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the heads up! Happy New Year!

[Carry_Okie]

So what makes your opinions superior?

Read this and tell me where else you have seen experts representing such divergent interests agreeing about anything.

[Snow Bunny]

You got that right my wonderful friend.

[SierraWasp]

STOP THE PRESSES!

RE-PING THE LIST!!!

Here's an INTERESTING up-date from today's Sacramento Bee Ess on "THE SIERRA NEVADA FRAME-UP!"

The difference in Quotes from local Enviral Whacko Craig Thomas, IS ENCOURAGING!!!

Hopeful shift by the Bush Administration!

Brityank, please ping everyone again so they can get their chins up off their chests a little. Oh, teenager won't like this and I enjoy hearing his squeal get "clear-cut!"

[Carry_Okie]

Isn't that the same as this thread? Am I guilty of improper pinging?

[Ben Ficklin]

See reply # 21 above

[SierraWasp]

You mean like this one is reversing himself?

Craig Thomas, spokesman for the Sierra Nevada Forest Protection Campaign, agreed, saying, "I think California is leading the way in terms of this agency bringing its credibility back." Then read his quote in the second article Brityank posted at the beginning of this thread... THEN READ HIS QUOTE IN WHAT I JUST LINKED, ABOVE! (Just like COB1 said!!!)

[expose]

its all U.N

[MaeWest]

.....environmentalists remained bitter Monday that administration officials first affirmed the framework and then called for a yearlong review. One said a lawsuit was inevitable if the agency follows its current path.

Yeeeeeeesssss!!
Thank you SierraWasp!!!

[SierraWasp]

NO!!! The quote from Craig Thomas and other takes are different, plus it's from the BEE not AP!

[SierraWasp]

Ain't it purdy? "W's" people are being appropriately sneaky, thank the Lord for little favors!!!

[Carry_Okie]

I'm still not sure where you are coming from.

At last, signs of intelligent life. Try reading the first chapter and get back to me.

[SierraWasp]

"Isn't that the same as this thread? Am I guilty of improper pinging?"

He!! NO!!! This shows the whole thing is up in the air for at least a year, plus the licentious litigators are gonna sue, like the allegators that they are!!!

I hope you guys didn't send everybody to bed depressed on the first day of the NEW YEAR!!!

WAKE 'EM BACK UP! WE WON AT LEAST A STAY OF EXECUTION!!!

[SierraWasp]

Hey! The disappointment is over! The Bush Administration has STUNG 'EM!!!

[Carry_Okie]

Keep yer venom in yer denim!!!
They ain't DONE nothin yet.

[B4Ranch]

Have you been celebrating the New Years a bit too much? Logic seems to have disappeared from your comments.

[farmfriend]

Having read Carry_Okie's book (in-part) and actively working for an organization that fights environmental crap, I can tell you that there is a lot of wisdom in Natural Process. The research that went into this book should qualify him for a degree. The intellegence behind the writing is plain to see for anyone who bothers to read it. If you are in the timber industry, this is the book for you since the basic precepts are built around the timber industry. Of course the concepts espoused will work for any environment, not just timber.