Skip to comments.
Sadly, an Honest Creationist
SecularHumanism.org ^
| Richard Dawkins
Posted on 12/29/2001 5:05:05 PM PST by cantfindagoodscreenname
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 341-359 next last
What do you think? This thread was posted earlier and deleted, but I have permission to post it again. I didn't see any of the discussion, but would love to see some back and forth on this. I'll just sit here quietly and watch. ;-)
To: cantfindagoodscreenname
Deja vu.
2
posted on
12/29/2001 5:07:53 PM PST
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
Your thoughts?
To: cantfindagoodscreenname
I am DICE the god of chance, all ye who are evolutionists fall down and worship me!!!!
4
posted on
12/29/2001 5:10:53 PM PST
by
keithtoo
To: cantfindagoodscreenname
The writer makes the assumption that there is overwhelming evidence supporting evolution, which there is NOT!!! I took a class at the University of Tennessee from a Dr. William Bass who is an esteemed forensic anthropologist and also a devout christian. He won international university professor of the year (he truly was an inspiration). He left the final two classes souly for the purpose of explaining why he believed in God and creationism and also in evolution. Wonderful man, I wish you all could have taken his class.
5
posted on
12/29/2001 5:14:07 PM PST
by
volchef
To: keithtoo
Read up on quantum physics? It appears that God does in fact play dice with the universe. Makes sense to me, if I were an omnipotent deity, I'd be bored with a universe in which I knew everything that would happen; I'd want some randomness tossed in.
To: cantfindagoodscreenname; *crevo_list
bump
To: ThinkDifferent
I'd want some randomness tossed in. Is there really such a thing as randomness? Or is randomness in the eye of the measurer?
To: keithtoo
To: Prodigal Daughter
bttt
To: ThinkDifferent
Such "dice" would have to be very smart indeed. Evolutionists dance and dance and dance around this point. In fact they are sometimes so brazen as to claim that the random-chance depiction of evolution is a strawman argument... then they pointedly ignore the implication of what they just said. Ah that's theism, and we don't care about that. We're SCIENTISTS.
To: Thinkin' Gal
12
posted on
12/29/2001 5:26:44 PM PST
by
Roscoe
To: cantfindagoodscreenname
Good question about randomness. I guess you could call it randomness everytime a new baby is created. Who knows what you'll get. No doubt, people and bodies do change. In fact many people are losing their incisors because we no longer have a need to rip and tear our meat as in the past. Thanks to a wonderful invention called the steak knife. People are also getting taller. However, this adaptation does not exclude a living and wonderful God who suits us exceptionally well for our environment so that we thrive and multiply.
13
posted on
12/29/2001 5:27:07 PM PST
by
volchef
To: vaderetro; longshadow; junior; jennyp; crevo_list
Bump.
To: physicist; radioastronomer; ThinkPlease; OWK;
Bump.
To: Roscoe
To: Thinkin' Gal
You win.
17
posted on
12/29/2001 5:35:14 PM PST
by
Roscoe
To: RickyJ;medved;Cultural Jihad
Bump
To: PatrickHenry
I keep hearing "dice". Organic molecules do not form via randomness! They follow a strict set of "rules" as they bond into complex hydrocarbons. So this randomness we keep hearing from the creation camp is totally bogus!
To: cantfindagoodscreenname
dawkins is one of the best. An interesting offhand comment concerning 'deep in bush country', though, does highlight a "problem" with the political party known as "REPUBLICAN"; namely -> the accepted wisdom that it is the party of old-time-religion... meaning unscientific type people. and that is a problem. sigh. sure would like to drop the 'bible-belt' label from the Repubs...and make 'conservative' stand for conservation of the ideals of this country, and not for the denial of a modern world, that is ruled by laws not 'discovered' by various 'chosen people' in a particular desert on a particular planet on a particular time... anyway. Dawkins is truly a good thinker, and mouth-piece for modern science...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 341-359 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson