Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America First: Why we need to examine our insane Foreign policy
self | 12/29/2001 | Demidog

Posted on 12/29/2001 9:27:49 AM PST by Demidog

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 961-978 next last
To: monkeyshine
A person can always renounce their citizenship can't they? I was talking about disenfranchising dual citizens not kicking them out. Don't try to muddle my argument with false premises. What is your interest in enfranchising dual citizens? Be honest.
241 posted on 12/29/2001 12:36:21 PM PST by Eternal_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: tex-oma; JakeWyld; Eagle Eye; tpaine; madrussian
No, their whole purpose is to pervert the thread and change the topic. Extra bonus points to the shills if anyone gets banned.

Apologies if you feel this post is off topic, though I think it's an appropriate tangent.

Tex, you've correctly made the call at #50, #51, #54, #59 and elsehwere that some on this thread were engaging in baiting.

But I saw no similar reply to the "NKVD gang" remark at #79. Sounds like baiting to me.

So do comments like "shill," "amen corner," "spread their filth," "thread bangers," "usual suspects," etc. Or the pork and kielbassa wisecracks in the midst of a debate about Israel.

Last night, I made the following observation here:

" I've also noticed that a number of self-described "America-firsters" and "anti-zionists" really seem to take a twisted sort of pleasure of rattling the cages of the "usual suspects" and the "amen-corner." They strike poses just outside the line of anti-semitism and taunt and bait and stick their thumbs in their ears, fingers a wiggling, just to provoke a visceral reaction from those with whom they disagree on Israel policy. As though they want to be called "anti-semite," and then make the charge of an ad hominem against their opposition. "

After about 80 posts of unsuccessfully trying to engage a self-described "America-firster" in debate on the merits, during which I called no one an anti-semite, "Islam-firster," or anything of the kind, I got this reply:

"For someone who is not Jewish you sure do have quite the knowlege about Israeli policy. This is very comical, all the Israeli supporters are not even Jewish. You and onyx and Lent all claim not be Jewish, so how much are they paying you ?"

Seems to me there's a lot of bait being thrown from all sides, no?


242 posted on 12/29/2001 12:36:31 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Thankfully there is One much greater than all of our messes who handles that all-important angle.

Amen.

243 posted on 12/29/2001 12:37:56 PM PST by nunya bidness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
I'm looking for a party (Conservative of course) that does more than just make promises to get elected. If I find one, I'll quit voting Republican.
244 posted on 12/29/2001 12:38:09 PM PST by al_possum39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
I'm about to hit 'abuse' on you for posting facts that don't place American policy in only the best of possible light. /sarcasm
245 posted on 12/29/2001 12:40:41 PM PST by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: LoisHunt
The sooner we drop the bravado of being THE LAST REMAINING SUPERPOWER, the better.

As soon as we do that, some evil empire will stake claim. History doesn't doesn't seem to be one of your strong points.

246 posted on 12/29/2001 12:42:31 PM PST by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Seems to me there's a lot of bait being thrown from all sides, no?

Objectively? Probably.

Subjectively? Only from the jerks.

247 posted on 12/29/2001 12:43:27 PM PST by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

Comment #248 Removed by Moderator

To: Demidog
Good post.

I believe in punishing the terrorists and the nations who harbor them.

But let us beware and heed Washington's warning against 'foreign entanglements'.

As FDR has proved, war is often the means to implement bigger and bigger government.

249 posted on 12/29/2001 12:44:37 PM PST by JURB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
Only from the jerks.

Would that include those who toss around "NKVD gang," "shill," "amen corner," "spread their filth," "thread bangers," "usual suspects," etc? Or those who make the pork and kielbassa wisecracks in the midst of a debate about Israel?


250 posted on 12/29/2001 12:47:03 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

Comment #251 Removed by Moderator

To: D Joyce
We may have "elected" them but we sure as hell didn't pick them to run.

Who do you think "picked them?"

252 posted on 12/29/2001 12:50:20 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Eternal_Bear
A person can always renounce their citizenship can't they? I was talking about disenfranchising dual citizens not kicking them out. Don't try to muddle my argument with false premises. What is your interest in enfranchising dual citizens? Be honest.

No, they cannot always renounce their citizenship. There are many threads on this subject here on FR which I have participated in.

And you said they should "Get Lost" or something to that effect which sounded to me like a euphamism for "get out of the country". What else would you mean by "get lost" -- how could they have their citizenship stripped and still remain in the USA? Give them a visa to stay?

I have no interest in enfranchising dual citizens. I simply state that it is a question of law. It's very simple if you would investigate it. As I stated, a person born in the USA is an American by rights. If this person has a British father, by British law, he is also a British citizen. It is not a question of choice, loyalty or thought, it is simply a matter of law. And it is impossible to renounce your British citizenship if you had one from birth. They don't recognize any renunciation of citizenships. Those are the facts.

As for me being honest, what bit of information do want from me? Do you want to know if I am a citizen of the USA? Of Israel? Of Britain? Just ask. I've answered these questions in great detail in the past.

253 posted on 12/29/2001 12:51:23 PM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
That would inclued any that don't agree with me 100% 100%.

IOW, those that are with me are great, those that oppose me are jerks.

Are you with me or are you a jerk? /any resemblance of humor.

254 posted on 12/29/2001 12:52:12 PM PST by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Would that include those who toss around "NKVD gang," "shill," "amen corner," "spread their filth," "thread bangers," "usual suspects," etc?

So you are saying that some of the posters here live in a glass house of cards, eh? I agree.

255 posted on 12/29/2001 12:53:13 PM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: JakeWyld
"If you have truly been in "too many" discussions with libertarians about drugs then why do you wish to make it a topic of this thread?"

It always seems to become a topic of any thread the Libertarians are in. A favorite term for them is "Drug Warriors." I thought that I would get my shot in first.

256 posted on 12/29/2001 12:58:12 PM PST by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
Are you with me or are you a jerk?

Well, since I'm a man, and "all men are jerks..."


257 posted on 12/29/2001 1:01:16 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
"Right. Now show where I've done that or take back this insinuation."

Are you saying that we need to change our foreign policies to be more obliging to the Arab World? Do we need to be more loving and kindly to the Muslims so that they won't be angry with us?

258 posted on 12/29/2001 1:01:45 PM PST by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
LOL!
259 posted on 12/29/2001 1:02:01 PM PST by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: Don Myers
Are you saying that we need to change our foreign policies to be more obliging to the Arab World? Do we need to be more loving and kindly to the Muslims so that they won't be angry with us?

No.

260 posted on 12/29/2001 1:03:04 PM PST by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 961-978 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson