First ever Abortion-Breast Cancer Settlement [ABORTION causes BREAST CANCER]

www.RFMNEWS.com ^ | 12-27-01

[Jhoffa_]

The plaintiff's attorney in the lawsuit, Charles Francis, Queen's Counsel, had cautioned the parliamentarians about the possibility of increased litigation against abortion providers which might occur as a result of expanding abortion rights.

Oh my... That would be tragic.

[Mamzelle]

I don't expect the government will protect abortionists from lawsuits. Just trying to pass that sort of legislation would attract huge attn to the facts and the risks of abortion. Leftists may regard abortion as their most cherished sacrament, but their high priests are trial lawyers!!

[Nitro]

Everyone except Catholics!

[anniegetyourgun]

Thankfully, going to hell doesn't have to be the case.

[Nitro]

You're right, I did and am having other fun!!

I would have loved to have Carly Simon!!

[JMJ333]

I'm Catholic! And yes, you most certainly are redeemable.

The primary message of Jesus was and is love and mercy.

Let's look at St. Paul. He was torturing and murdering Christians. He was indeed redeemed and went on to be a great apostle. Not because he merited grace, but because God chose to use him as an instrument to show love and mercy.

:)

[JMJ333]

Okay...gotcha. I thought you were serious. Carly Simon???

[Notwithstanding]

Apparently the most significant factor, abortion, was left out.

Did you miss this from the article?:

determined Australian women who had abortions increased their risks for breast cancer by 160%. As the study's most significant and only statistically significant risk factor, abortion was unparalleled among all of the variables examined. The elevated risk resulting from induced abortion far and away exceeded that of family history for the disease and even childlessness, according to the research. ... At a talk given in 1999 in Malvern, Australia, Brind said, "This is not what you see in scientific research, ever. I've never seen it before, where the most significant finding in a study is specifically left out of a research paper."

[Dr. Good Will Hunting]

It will be buried by the Feminist State.

Bit of a story: every January, NARAL has a banquet to celebrate Roe vs. Wade. They toast each other, eat, drink, and make merry. Minions of hell?

Yes.

[Dr. Good Will Hunting]

[JMJ333]

No....not an abortionist....more like a nit-wit.

[Alpenkatze]

and not just for the women but for the boyfriends, husbands, grandmothers... My present girlfriend said if she became pregnant from me it will be her last (meaning she would never abort it and won't have children with anyone else again - we have ideas of marriage). But she told me about a previous abortion and how the man had cried and cried. I said don't you feel sick about that? She said well he wasn't going to stick around - why should I have kept it? My arguement didn't go very far, but I did tell her that this told me something about her and left it at that. She will soon be at that age, and I feel I will truely be her last chance at it. If we were younger, I would probably have dumped her then. I know she really wants to have a child with me, but I sometimes feel like those who abort a child in the past shouldn't be aloud the privilege of a pregnancy and the beauty of child birth. So I'm really going to think things out first.

[gov_bean_ counter]

I see a Freeper opportunity for someone with access to a mobile mamogram machine.

[DWSUWF]

"...I don't expect the government will protect abortionists from lawsuits..."

Your arguments are sound, but I think the bottom line will be economic, not ideological.

If this dog (successful lawsuits) hunts, the women who've killed their children will pursue it.

And so will the lawyers.

Everyone involved will rationalize that, 'yes abortion is a sacred right, but I'm justified in my action because...'

At some point the radical pro-death infiltrators in the government will have to move to protect their (as you put it very well) 'sacrament'.

If the dog doesn't hunt (or doesn't hunt very well) you'll be right, no public moves to protect the murderers will be made.

I'm hoping, with some confidence, that these murdering women and ambulance chasing shysters just won't be able to resist the $$$ bait! (LOL)

[Romulus]

The idea that you have to go to hell -- to die forever -- is the enemy's Great Lie.

[hinckley buzzard]

This is a finding just waiting to happen in the US. The "failure to warn" goes directly to the issue of informed consent.

"Informed consent" is based on those facts which a reasonable patient (woman) would want or need in order to make a decision (NOT what a "physician" thinks is necessary and sufficient).

The AMA, the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Psychological Association, to name a few, have deliberately engaged in criminal collusion, to deprive women seeking abortion of the kind of information which any reasonable woman would want.

This is a time-bomb waiting only for the right case before the right judge, and a US Supreme Court ruling ultimately is inevitable.

Informed consent is legally a civil rights issue in the US; and the leftists will choke on their own dishonesty when this one hits the federal courts.

[Nitro]

Yes, Carly Simon, you got a problem with that?

[Free the USA]

FYI

[Nitro]

Ever hear of Mortal Sin!!

[patent]

Bumping. Let me know if you want on or off the list. Click my screen name for a description.

patent