Posted on 12/19/2001 4:38:50 PM PST by Clinton's a rapist
I suppose it depends on what you mean by soon. George W. Bush is not going to allow Saddam Hussein to terrorize the world. We will attack and destroy his regime.
Have you seen this yet? Iraqi Defector Tells of Work on at Least 20 Hidden Weapons Sites
The religious zeal to justify their intentions of murder and suicide comes through loud and clear to me. It reminds me of this verse out of the Bible:
The sample is a hotel registration card that Alshehhi filled out:
I found this on a handwriting analysis site. It looks real, but I don't know the original source. (The site appears to be honest. They also have copies of the so-called terrorist suicide notes that we've discussed; I verified that the images they post are identical to the images at the FBI web site.)
The most important thing to notice is that Alshehhi wrote the dates as: "8-26 - 9-2-01". Notice the American date order (month-day-year). This goes against some people's claim that the American ordering of the dates in the anthrax letters suggests that the anthax letters were written by an American, not a Middle Easterner. This hotel registration card confirms that the 9/11 terrorists were sufficiently familiar with our customs that they would write dates in the order we normally use. [Just to jog everyone's memory, the anthrax letters are all dated "09-11-01".]
The second thing to notice is the use of dashes in the dates, instead of the more common slashes. Dashes were also used in the dates in the anthrax letters.
A difference between the dates here and the dates in the anthrax letters is that the month on the anthrax letters is written as "09", while the months on this registration card are written without the initial "0".
I'm no handwriting expert, but this doesn't appear to be the same hand as the anthrax letters. Of course, the writer of the anthrax letters was apparently trying to disguise his handwriting. He printed, and the writing is very neat and deliberate. This sample is written in cursive, and it was scrawled quickly, so they're difficult to compare.
I won't bother reposting the anthrax letter or envelopes, since I don't see a lot of similarity in handwriting between those documents and this sample. The 6 and the 9 look similar, but the 1, 2, and 8 do not. There's no slant in the hotel card sample. If you do want to compare them yourself, you'll probably find it useful to get a graphics program and enlarge the images.
Here's an alternative hypothesis for you - the way the FBI has investigated the anthrax attack it has become clear that someone in a key investigative position is an AlQeada agent. That person has done everything they could to divert the investigation from the Florida connection.
Well, I always thought so, but others didn't. In any case, it's different to have an actual document with American style dates written by one of the 9/11 hijackers just a couple of weeks before the hijacking. It's no longer a matter for speculation -- there's now hard evidence that Alshehhi used American-style dates. And this was in a hotel registration card, obviously written quickly, without much thought.
with many of them having worked at convenience stores or as taxicab drivers - those are the type of employers that have their employees writing down dates constantly.
Did any of the hijackers actually work at convenience stores or as taxicab drivers? I know that many Middle Easterners and other foreigners work at such jobs, but did these specific people?
Here's an alternative hypothesis for you - the way the FBI has investigated the anthrax attack it has become clear that someone in a key investigative position is an AlQeada agent. That person has done everything they could to divert the investigation from the Florida connection.
This seems doubtful, and there's no real evidence for it. I don't think any one person at the FBI could do that, since people like Rumsfeld wouldn't put up with it.
You're probably right that a well-placed individual at the FBI could stymie an investigation, and certainly could steer it in a particular direction. (There's nothing wrong in principle with an investigator judging the appropriate direction to pursue. That's his or her job, but the decision should be based on the evidence.)
But I also think that any connections with a foreign power or with al-Qaeda would necessitate the involvement of the Defense Dept. At the very least, Rumsfeld would be kept informed of the status of the investigation. Also, the Defense Dept., the State Dept., the CIA, and the NSA are more natural places than the FBI to put together information on the anthrax case (assuming that it is, in fact, a foreign military action).
I don't doubt that either incompetence or a mole at the FBI could disrupt the FBI's investigation. But this would not stop the U.S. government's investigation, since that is likely to be centered in defense and foreign policy areas.
Even if the FBI is more competent and trustworthy than it appears to be, the Defense Dept. would be foolish to rely on what is essentially a domestic police investigation in trying to unravel a foreign military attack. And Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz are far from foolish.
I'm also very reluctant to talk about a foreign agent manipulating the FBI without some sort of proof. Idle speculation on such things is problematic at best.
uh oh...
One of the nations top biodefense researchers has died in Maryland from an apparent suicide, just as the Justice Department was to file criminal charges against him in the anthrax mailing assaults of 2001 that killed five, the Los Angeles Times has learned. Bruce E. Ivins, 62, who for the past 18 years worked at the governments elite biodefense research laboratories at Fort Detrick, Md..-------Anthrax suspect dies in apparent suicide Los Angeles Times via Kansascity.com ^ | 8/1/08 | David Willman Posted on Friday, August 01, 2008 1:29:15 AM by hole_n_one
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.