Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CHARLEY REESE: Israeli prime minister lets loose the dogs of war
The McComb Enterprise-Journal (MS) ^ | Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:43 AM CST | Charley Reese

Posted on 12/17/2001 9:30:48 AM PST by ouroboros

To understand what’s going on in the Middle East, you have to understand Ariel Sharon, Israel’s prime minister.

Sharon does not now and never has wanted a peace with the Palestinians. He is the father of the Israeli settlements in the West Bank, and he will never consent to dismantling even one of them. In fact, he is committed to expanding them.

He said soon after taking office that he would never sign a permanent settlement with the Palestinians. He has refused to meet with the Palestinians. He himself started the intifada by invading Islam’s third-holiest site and arrogantly calling it Jewish property.

But Sharon had two problems. One, he was being pressured by the United States to make peace with the Palestinians. Two, Yasser Arafat, the Palestinian Authority president, was winning sympathy in Europe for the Palestinian cause, which is simply an end to Israeli occupation.

So Sharon’s problem was thus: How do you wreck the peace process without being blamed for wrecking the peace process? The short-term solution was to set the absurd condition that seven days had to go by without a violent act before he would even consider talking.

There are 3 million Palestinians there, and Arafat’s authority is limited basically to the boundaries of a few cities. It is literally impossible for him to prevent one individual from taking a potshot at an Israeli. Especially is it impossible when Sharon himself is ordering the Israelis to commit acts of violence and other provocations.

No country in the world could systematically assassinate more than 27 political opponents without being branded a terrorist state. Of course, Israel gets a free ride in the United States. At the same time this is going on, Sharon is discrediting Arafat by blaming him for any and every act of violence, even those directly provoked by Israel.

When Israel assassinated the leader of a Palestinian group, the man’s followers promised vengeance. A few days later, they assassinated an Israeli cabinet member. They publicly took responsibility for it.

Sharon’s response was to attack Palestinian Authority police stations and to blame Arafat. But Sharon’s biggest stroke of luck was the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States and President Bush’s declaration of war on terrorism. Now he had Bush where he wanted him, so the Israelis began to put tremendous pressure on the administration to include Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah on its list of terrorist organizations. And they succeeded, as the Israeli lobby so often does in Washington.

Still, Sharon needed one spectacular terrorist attack to justify his coup de grace to the peace process. And he knew how to get it. He ordered the assassination of a prominent and popular Hamas leader. Sharon knew that Hamas would retaliate, and it did, with three suicide bombings in Jerusalem and Haifa. Now he had what he wanted: an excuse to kill the peace process once and for all.

By branding the Palestinian Authority as an organization that harbors and sponsors terrorism, and by declaring two PLO organizations as terrorist organizations, the Israeli government has announced its intention to destroy all three. Then there will be nobody to negotiate with.

Bush is snookered. Sharon can say: “Look, I’m only following your example. The Palestinian Authority is my Taliban, and the PLO organizations are terrorists. You yourself said, Mr. President, that terrorists and people who support them must be destroyed.”

I’d like to be wrong once in a while about the Middle East, but, alas, I’m right. If you wish to look back, you will see that when Sharon became prime minister, I said the peace process is dead. Later, I said the United States’ one-sided support of Israel would bring Middle East terrorism to the United States. That was in August.

Now I suggest we all hunker down. Because of Sharon’s shrewdness and ruthlessness and our stupidity and naivete, the dogs of war have been let loose. Our newborn grandchildren will probably grow beards before the blood stops flowing.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last
To: veronica
Odd. How come Chuckie Cheese doesn't mention the hate indoctrination schools that the "Palestinians" are running "for the children"?

Must have slipped his mind. ;-)

21 posted on 12/17/2001 12:37:09 PM PST by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
Charley Reese is an idiot.
22 posted on 12/17/2001 12:37:58 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
So are the people who keep posting his articles, and agree with him. : - )
23 posted on 12/17/2001 12:41:07 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator, tex-oma
The 'spontaneous' Arab uprising by Joseph Farah "Well, it turns out Ariel Sharon didn't exactly provoke the latest Palestinian uprising with his trip to the Temple Mount, after all." (Follow link)

Hey omar - the US is so concerned over that bogus spying story that::: Deal in works to (co)-produce (Israeli) Arrow anti-missile system in US.

LOL.

24 posted on 12/17/2001 12:42:45 PM PST by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie, nopardons
Charley Reese is an idiot. So are the people who keep posting his articles, and agree with him. : - )

Funny how that works out, eh?

25 posted on 12/17/2001 12:44:38 PM PST by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: tex-oma
Getting dizzy? Snicker.
27 posted on 12/17/2001 12:49:36 PM PST by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Lion_King
There was a post here about it and the 4 part series on the tv show.
28 posted on 12/17/2001 12:58:59 PM PST by jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Plump and Proud
He himself started the intifada by invading Islam’s third-holiest site and arrogantly calling it Jewish property.

Why the nerve! It's almost as though the Pope had walked into the Vatican and declared it property of the Roman Catholic Church!

It's hard to imagine such chutzpah, Charlie? (I'm shocked, shocked to know that the Jews consider the Temple Mount on which THEY BUILT SOLOMON's TEMPLE in 900 BC THEIR PROPERTY!)

Charlie is good on virtually every other subject. I suspect he writes on Israel when he's had a few too many to drink and his wife starts nagging him. He just needs an outlet, and for him, that evidently means beating up on big, bad Israel.

(You know, Israel, population apprx 6 million and current land area LESS THAN HALF that of San Bernardino County, California?)

29 posted on 12/17/2001 1:00:24 PM PST by BenR2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Plump and Proud
He himself started the intifada by invading Islam’s third-holiest site and arrogantly calling it Jewish property.

Why the nerve! It's almost as though the Pope had walked into the Vatican and declared it property of the Roman Catholic Church!

It's hard to imagine such chutzpah, Charlie! (I'm shocked, shocked to know that the Jews consider the Temple Mount on which THEY BUILT SOLOMON's TEMPLE in 900 BC THEIR PROPERTY!)

Charlie is good on virtually every other subject. I suspect he writes on Israel when he's had a few too many to drink and his wife starts nagging him. He just needs an outlet, and for him, that evidently means beating up on big, bad Israel.

(You know, Israel, population apprx 6 million and current land area LESS THAN HALF that of San Bernardino County, California?)

30 posted on 12/17/2001 1:01:39 PM PST by BenR2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BenR2
Whoops! Double-posting not intentional. Sorry.
31 posted on 12/17/2001 1:02:25 PM PST by BenR2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BenR2
I know what you mean. When I read tripe like this, it makes me throw up my hands in despair. How can you reason with people who lie so comfortably, and about such large matters?
32 posted on 12/17/2001 1:02:51 PM PST by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
BTTT
33 posted on 12/17/2001 1:13:20 PM PST by Marianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
Charley Reese ROCKS!!! He's one of the very few widely-read columnists who actually dare to say what they think about Israel. After all, anyone who dares to question anything Israel does or even hints at the fact that Israel might do wrong sometimes MUST be an anti-Semite, right? Or so our mainstream spinmeisters tell us. I think Charley's dead right on this and many other subjects. I hope he keeps up the good work.
34 posted on 12/17/2001 1:14:58 PM PST by Mighty Pen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mighty Pen
"anyone who dares to question anything Israel does or even hints at the fact that Israel might do wrong sometimes MUST be an anti-Semite, right."

Hmmmm....watch this: "Israel does do wrong sometimes."

Now, something tells me I won't be labelled an anti-Semite.

It's not the criticism itself, but the intellectual dishonesty that marks someone as a professional anti-Semite. For instance, decrying Sharon's visit to "Islam's 3rd holiest site" without bothering to mention that it is Judaism's #1 (and only) holy site.

35 posted on 12/17/2001 1:21:17 PM PST by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Mighty Pen
" Charley Reese ROCKS!!!

Shame they're all in his head.

36 posted on 12/17/2001 1:26:54 PM PST by KJMorgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Comment #37 Removed by Moderator

To: veronica
I used to like Charley Reese but these later columns are just so out of touch with reality....

Oh,observers coming? Not likely! The Israelies have already seen how neutral the blue hats can be!

38 posted on 12/17/2001 4:21:29 PM PST by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Big Ditto for your post #9 - bttt
39 posted on 12/17/2001 4:24:47 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: veronica
"Little green men you mean? You see them often, do you?"

rofl....hahaha

You tell 'em - GoVeronicaGo! bttt

40 posted on 12/17/2001 4:26:28 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson