"A response to Andrew Sullivan" - By Salon's Managing Editor, Re: Bush Assassination Cartoon

Salon ^ | December 13, 2001 | Scott Rosenberg

[Paul Atreides]

Shouldn't Scott be out on the nearest corner hawking apples to make the next payroll? Daylight's burnin', pardner.

I know of a Harlem office he could stand in front of, holding a sign that reads, "Will blow for food." If that fails, he could try the same at a house in Chappaqua.

[Paul Atreides]

What do you want to be that this author thinks there was subliminal advertising in the "Rats" ad?

[Ragtime Cowgirl]

Thanks for the ping. Did Salon's editor think we wouldn't see the cartoon or that we need him to interpret what we can clearly see and understand? Shame on him and his sorry lot of spoiled children. They see danger in the ownership of guns. In their immature hands, guns would be a danger, but for the adults who are responsible for the greatness of our nation guns mean our (and their) freedom. This editor (and his fellow excuse-makers) has no business handling that dangerous and mighty pen without adult supervision and proper training.