Cops can't find super gun

New Haven Register (the on;y paper not even good enough to be a birdcage liner or fishwrap) ^ | December 13, 2001 | William Kaempffer, Register staff

[Leisler]

I am surprised they didn't find a Abercrombie & Fitch catalog and charge him with kiddie porn.

[the]

That Barrett is, as a listed by name semi-automatic assault weapon covered under the 1994 ban.

See Definitions of Assault Weapon in CT

[Movemout]

I remember that thread. Your point is well taken.

[packrat01]

But adding guns to the mix only makes the thought crimes worse.

My, oh, my. Now you have degrees of punishment, because some thought crimes are worse.

If I thought Kennedy would do another bridge-dive with a babe in the car; would they jail me, or Kennedy?

Maybe the author wrote it that way to shake up peoples' thoughts?

... and instigate more thought crimes for the prosecutor?

[Leisler]

Change "limousine liberals" to "armored limousine liberals."

[Alas]

The batf and fbi, along with a hundred or so other federal police agencies lied and protected the right of clinton to have the keys and codes to our nuclear arsenal and they go after this guy?

What a sick bunch of slugs.

Chris

[mbb bill]

How many cops are shot with a 50 caliber?? Never heard of one!! Must be just scary to them...

[wwjdn]

I for one think we need to spend another million or so looking for this one weapon...

And yes, the gun shop is at fault.

[Leisler]

Really? I was just kidding. It is hard to keep up with so called reality.

[PatrioticAmerican]

WOW! I can't believe that ALL of those guns are BANNED!

[from occupied ga]

If I thought Kennedy would do another bridge-dive with a babe in the car; would they jail me, or Kennedy?

You have to ask? You of course.

[George Smiley]

I am all for taking whack jobs out of the gene pool before they murder innocent people and to some extent it seems that this might be an example of that.

Your line of reasoning disturbs me.

Arresting people because they *might* commit a crime is right out of the playbook of the KGB and the Gestapo.

[Movemout]

No really. I posted an article saying that I supported Joe Gibbs in his criticism of the Abercrombie and Fitch catalogue which had some questionable pictorials. I personally like Joe Gibbs and did not question his judgement. Boy was I flamed. Your take on the distortion of the application of law is correct. There are too many laws which allow prosecutors to pick and choose who the criminal du jour will be. I have had enough of this nonsense.

[Movemout]

I guess I'm not communicating very well today. I do not advocate the prosecution of thought crimes. I think that if there is evidence that fellow citizens are in danger of being murdered that measures to protect them should be taken. I do not think that sufficient evidence exists in this case. Don't mess up on FR or you will pay the piper.

[the]

Arresting people because they *might* commit a crime is right out of the playbook of the KGB and the Gestapo.

And of course CT law enforcement. We have a "law" up here that allows the police to take guns away from people who have not committed and maybe even are not accused of committing any crime. The police go before a judge saying that they think someone's guns should be taken away, judge signs the order, cops come and take guns away.

It has gotten so bad up here that when a homicide with a black powder revolver happened a few days ago there were questions about why didn't the police take this guys weapons away before he committed the crime!

[Liberal Classic]

"super gun" "scary"

I'm so glad they are being rational.

[Orangedog]

He allegedly planned to send hateful, anti-Semitic letters to a batch of alumni, sources said.

Well, it sounds like they have a solid case of "premeditated mischief with intent to think incorrectly."

[EODGUY]

I'm surprised that since limos are gas gulping monstrosities, the psycho liberals wouldn't advocate shooting them.

[zog]

--greetings from mountain country to you fellow georgian. I have lived in all those states up there with the exception of rhode island. Maine and vermont are acceptable, the others aren't, and I would include the mid atlantic states as well, starting with New York. Like, pataki is a conservative???? But, maine and vermont have hope, new hampshire used to have hope, but not now that their politics are becoming dominated to the worse from it's being a commuter bedroom community of north shore massachusetts and boston I don't think that is true.

Of course, you got to really dig 9 months of winter, too........

middle class in the hood around here=two pickups on blocks in the front yard, up in maine it's two snowmobiles up on blocks...

heheheheheh, there's tradeoffs evedrywhere, I honestly don't think any one place has it all over any other place geographically, there's plusses and minuses but being reality based, you simply have to take politics into consideration. Mass and connecticut are abysmal in my opinion, even though I enjoyed living there at one time. Lots of pretty places there, but completely screwed up politics dominates your living. I don't think they have much better than a 1 or 2% chance of changing for the better either. And georgia could even slip into really bad territory if the democrat party and urban-centrism continues it's dominance of politics here on most issues. For now it's "OK", but there's a chance it could get worse, and the trends are "worse" more or less right now under roy barne's and tom murphy's machines "leadership" and policies.

Politics is way more "red zone and blue zone" than party's anymore, and that is inside states as well as states in general. Well, that's my opinion anyway.

[Khepera]

I wouldn't move to any of those socialise hell holes if I could triple my income by doing so

Hey all the liberals know this is a lie!! People will do anything for more money. < /sarcasm>