Posted on 12/11/2001 6:54:58 AM PST by veronica
Which is exactly what you did. Seems you're the one who owes Zinni an apology.
If it were true, it would be plastered all over the place. The most likely reason for it not to be reported anywhere else is that other media outlets cannot confirm it.
They wouldn't have reported him in the first place, as Atta's visa was in order.
Your example is a straw man.
Source: Christian Science Monitor - 12/11/01
Author: Daniel Schorr
"The Bush administration, its last-ditch cease-fire effort blasted by the suicide bombings in Israel, has all but given up on finding a Palestinian partner for peace. President Bush addresses Yasser Arafat as he once addressed the Taliban, with a stern demand that he "rise up and fight terror." The "or else" is unspoken. Bush has ordered the freezing of assets linked to Palestinian militants as he has frozen the assets linked to the al-Qaida terrorist organization.
No longer do administration officials ritually balance the condemnation of Arab violence with appeals for Israeli restraint. After air strikes on Gaza and the West Bank, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said, "Obviously, Israel has the right to defend herself."
When President Bush met with Prime Minister Ariel Sharon last Sunday before the air strikes had been launched, he could have counseled restraint. He didn't. Fleischer said that Sharon did not ask for a green light - and, presumably, Bush did not flash an amber light.
Frustration with Arafat is now openly expressed by administration officials. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, recalling Arafat's own days as a terrorist, says, "He is not a particularly strong leader." Secretary of State Colin Powell, usually painfully measured between the contending parties, now says sarcastically that it's time to put Palestinian bombers in "real jails where they are not walking free several days later."
After Sept. 11, the Bush administration worried about antagonizing Islamic supporters of the antiterrorist coalition by not appearing sufficiently sensitive to the Palestinian cause. Now, the administration sounds as though it considers Palestinian violence as part of the global threat of terrorism. White House sources say that President Bush has demanded directly of Arafat that he break up the militant Hamas and Islamic Jihad organizations.
It is not likely that Arafat will, and it is far from likely that he can. That means that the grizzled veteran, who has steered his way successfully through all the minefields of talking and fighting through all these years, may finally be reaching the end of his line.
If he turns his back on the intifada, he faces an intra-Palestinian civil war that could test the ability of aging leadership to prevail over youthful rage. If he is brought down, there is no new single leader in sight.
Thus the suicide bombings that almost coincided with the arrival of retired Gen. Anthony Zinni, the president's peace envoy, represent as much a challenge to Arafat as to Sharon or Bush. The Arab-Israeli conflict could, even before Iraq, become the next battleground in the war against terrorism."
Then why try to broker peace with him?
No wingnut. I stand by this article 100%. If you don't like, LUMP IT!!
That's all I needed to read. Further discussion is pointless.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.