Historian's Prizewinning Book on Guns Is Embroiled in a Scandal

NY Times via Yahoo! ^ | 12/8/2001 | ROBERT F. WORTH

[cibco]

I remember the night Dan Blather reported this book on his "news". I had my suspicions about Dan and this story was the final straw. His report was filled with so much glee... he looked like an idiot.

That was over two yrs ago and I haven't watched Dan since. I suppose he will do a follow up exposing this book for it's falsehoods. Would someone alert me when he does this? I will be holding my breath until then...

[Pharmboy]

Yes, true enough, but in the past the effin NYT would never have printed this type of report. NOTHING would EVER get into print that tested their vision of the world. There have been other instances of this shift to the center for the paper of record in the past year, and for another example, Click Here

[aculeus]

Lefties have to lie. Their entire ideology is built on it.

[Bonaparte]

" Would someone alert me when he does this? I will be holding my breath until then..."

Don't! Rather is not known for retractions, just as the Bancroft committee, the Pulitzer committee and the Nobel committee aren't known for checking facts before handing out prizes. Menchu, Marquez, Neruda and dozens of other leftist propagandists are screened only for adhering to the party line. To this day, the NYT likes to boast about reporter Walter Durranty, who won a Pulitzer for white-washing Stalin's brutal regime.

[Squire]

Is he name pronounced BUH-Lees or PUH-lees? BUH-Sleaze?