Skip to comments.
Original Terrorists (Rush Limbaugh on Arafat)
Rush Limbaugh.com ^
| 1204/01
| Rush Limbaugh (the great one)
Posted on 12/04/2001 8:47:19 AM PST by veronica
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
1
posted on
12/04/2001 8:47:19 AM PST
by
veronica
To: dennisw; vrwc54; Lent; Sabramerican; hsszionist; ThreeOfSeven; candyman34; onyx; Cachelot...
FYI.
2
posted on
12/04/2001 8:49:05 AM PST
by
veronica
To: veronica
To: veronica
The last two paragraphs are the key, and Rush is far from the only one to point it out.
Either Arafat can't stop the terror, or he won't. So he is either irrelevant or the enemy.
4
posted on
12/04/2001 8:50:43 AM PST
by
Uncle Fud
To: veronica
As usual, Rush is right!
To: veronica
Rush is the greatest. Wonder what the self-proclaimed "America Firsters" have to say about this?
6
posted on
12/04/2001 8:52:12 AM PST
by
BenF
To: veronica
Rush is dead on with this assessment.
I know that there are some who think Rush is a lackey for the Republicans. I don't want to hear a lot of that crap on this thread, because that has nothing to do with this issue.
7
posted on
12/04/2001 8:55:24 AM PST
by
mattdono
To: BenF
"Wonder what the self-proclaimed "America Firsters" have to say about this?" This from Buchanan:
"And what of America? So long as the United States provides Israel with the weapons and money to crush intifadas, expand settlements and postpone the coming of a Palestinian state, our reputation in the Middle East is in the custody of Ariel Sharon. If Bush cannot put distance between us, America will end up with all his enemies and only his friends."
Source Thread
To: mattdono
He is a lackey, a lackey for the truth.
To: Cyber Liberty
Pat needs to get his Brown Shirt on.
To: Uncle Fud
"The last two paragraphs are the key, and Rush is far from the only one to point it out."I heard Bibi Netan(Yahoo!) make the very same point this morning on Imus. Great minds ....
To: veronica
This opinion has been on the lips of Israels supporters for some time now. Nice to see that someone with a bit of stature is finally grabbing on though. Personally, I'd have to go with irrelevant. I think we are looking at a Palestinian civil war before we know who the real leadership of these people is. Once it becomes clear who we are dealing with, then we'll see what happens.
12
posted on
12/04/2001 9:02:27 AM PST
by
dsb
To: Cyber Liberty
I don't have any respect for Buchanan. His "patriotism" seems to consist more of offending other Americans than any genuine concern for the welfare of this country.
13
posted on
12/04/2001 9:02:51 AM PST
by
BenF
To: The G Man
I saw Bibi make the argument twice on TV last night, and neither Bill Press nor Alan "snake-eyes" Colmes could make a dent in it.
To: BenF
He's relegated himself to the ashbin of history with his buddy, 'Dolf.
"We've seen their kind before."
To: BenF
Yeah, he loves Americans, as long as they are real Americans, like him.
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: veronica
Arafat is hardly original.
The Irgun, Stern Gang and Hagannah preceeded him by 20 years with letter bombs, fire bombs and drive by shootings.
The British probably remember.
To: theoldright
It looks like the "conservative icon" Rush Limbaugh forgot to read the part about *entangling alliances* You know, I always get a kick out of those who interpret Washington according to their own consciences....especially when it comes to Israel.
19
posted on
12/04/2001 9:10:44 AM PST
by
BenF
To: BenF
'Scuse me.. Concerned for the welfare of which country?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
