Skip to comments.
Bush's inexperience is showing
Toronto Sun ^
| 12/02/01
| Eric Margolis
Posted on 12/02/2001 6:41:31 AM PST by LarryLied
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
1
posted on
12/02/2001 6:41:31 AM PST
by
LarryLied
To: LarryLied
"BARF ALERT"
To: LarryLied
Sensible Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, and the administration's sharpest mind, Secretary of State Colin Powell, are trying to restrain the Sharonistas, who seem dangerously close to convincing Bush to launch a crusade against much of the 1.2-billion-person Islamic world. They failed with clever Bill Clinton, but are succeeding with the unworldly Bush.Colin Powell is no doubt a very bright man, but he has always gotten extra IQ points for his skin color. It is the usual knee-jerk leftist media reaction. Also, clever Bill Clinton gets his usual share of praise.
3
posted on
12/02/2001 6:49:10 AM PST
by
billhilly
To: LarryLied; aculeus
Aculeus, I believe you've posted Margolis columns in the past. Has he (recently) gone off the deep end?
4
posted on
12/02/2001 6:49:32 AM PST
by
dighton
To: Travis McGee
5
posted on
12/02/2001 6:50:19 AM PST
by
AnnaZ
To: LarryLied
Margolis is nothing more than a terrorist shill. He's never found an Islamic terrorist he didn't love.
6
posted on
12/02/2001 6:51:45 AM PST
by
LarryM
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: LarryLied
THIS IS A SPIN SIN
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: LarryLied
Russia now dominates Afghanistan, thus reversing its historic defeat of the 1980s, shutting the U.S. and Pakistan out of Central Asia, and ensuring future Russian control of the Caspian Basin's oil and gas resources. Bush was too busy trying to "smoke out" outlaws Osama bin Laden and Mullah Omar to notice his new best friends, the Russians, had drygulched him and grabbed the lion's share of Afghanistan. ...and what is wrong with Russian control of these resources? They have proven themselves a reliable supplier of oil, and have even had the courage to defy OPEC from time to time. I am confident it was all worked out at the Bush/Putin summit in Crawford. And I am confident the President insured American interests.
To: LarryLied
The inexperience of the Osama Bin Laden and the Taliban is what is showing. You live by the sword you die by the sword.
11
posted on
12/02/2001 7:03:43 AM PST
by
hflynn
To: LarryLied
To: LarryLied
The Alliance proclaimed itself Afghanistan's legitimate government last week. Moscow recognized the Alliance, and rushed "advisers" and troops into Afghanistan. So what? Let them have that cesspool. Just so long as Afghanistan can no longer serve as a base of operations for terrorists to attack our country. The Russians are a lot of things but they aren't terrorists. And they won't allow Islamic terrorists to gain a foothold there again.
As for the Russians getting the oil, again, so what? I'd rather the U.S. buy oil from the Russians than a bunch of crazed Muslims. Is the author suggesting that WE occupy Afghanistan and exploit their oil resources? No thanks. Afghanistan is in Russia's backyard. Let them have it.
To: NeonKnight
My take on it too. Margolis is just upset over a US/Russian alliance. It puts his eurotrash socialist buddies out in the cold.
To: LarryLied
Wow what a crock of crap.
15
posted on
12/02/2001 7:10:06 AM PST
by
lawgirl
To: lawgirl
Margolis does serve a social function however. He shovels all the left wing crap in one neat pile.
To: billhilly
This guys say Bill Clinton is worldly. Right, there is only one thing Bill Clinton is wordly about and we all know what that is. Another thing, is you are not worldly simply because you travel. You have to experience life; not travel in protected luxury.
To: lawgirl
Most definitely!!!!
To: LarryLied
This is not D-Day, nor the Alamo, and certainly no reason to launch America on the 21st century's first world war. The difference between 911 and D day (or the Alamo) is that more people died on 911 than in either of these battles. The second difference is that they were civilians.
For all his blather about the Northern allience being ruthless, he forgets that the US can be ruthless also.
Maybe Amnesty international is crying over a bunch of terrorists, mainly Chechnians and Pakistanis, that were massacred when they revolted AFTER they had surrendered, but I suspect that thousands of Russians and Pakistanis will be alive in the future because these "innocent" terrorists won't come home to spread the terror.
(Not to mention the danger of a couple thousand armed men lose behind your lines is not very smart: any soldier would know that, but presumably liberals know nothing about war. )
19
posted on
12/02/2001 7:19:03 AM PST
by
LadyDoc
To: Travis McGee
DITTO!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson