Posted on 11/29/2001 10:29:12 AM PST by A.J.Armitage
Few current self-proclaimed "freedom lovers" seem to want to address the question of our ethics, the moral foundation required by a free nation. The self-control and discipline that allows us to make wise decisions and not trespass on our neighbors is lessened by all those very human temptations we choose and protect from drugs to porn, to abortion and the dimished respect and understanding of the importance of both family and religion in place of instant gratification and easy answers.
I believe that it's important to allow many voices into this debate, especially now. We can no longer pretend that it's possible to live isolated from the rest of the world. The illusion was effectively shattered on 9-11.
Personally, I think the Quakers have close to the right idea, but we probably wouldn't be allowed to live in an isolated armed communtiy within the US.
You see A. J., if you were not a traitor you would know that in a time of war the American people do not distinguish between the nation and it's armed forces. We are now a nation at arms, and you have the choice of being with us or with the enemy.
It is unlikely that the war will ever be over, since its proposed purpose is to rid the world of terrorism, which will never happen. But at some point, I suppose, the war will no longer be useful to the government and might end. By that time, it is unlikely anyone will be discussing anything without the governments permission, and certainly not any of its policies, past or present.
I think we better do our talking now, or we won't be doing any.
Or maybe you just can't beleive it can happen here.
Hank
Please cite any evidence whatsover of:
a worshipful attitude towards politicians
Toadying shamelessly or otherwise
Any Evidence that I consider anyone on earth to be my superior
Any virtues real or invented claimed for anyone other than the American people
Any examples of cowardice.
The plain fact is that you are giving aid and comfort to the enemy in a time of war.
Thanks. The historical figure is not one that would protect Freedom.
I don't know Jack. (snort) Ain't like it used to be. We were REAL conservatives, not like this riff-raff.
I used ta know everbody in town. Now, I don't even know anybody who knows these newbies. (spit)
It's when they built the railroad. Anybody can ride the dang thang and get here. Not like our day when you really had to know the territory ta git here. (slurp)
Yep, those fellers had it too dang easy, that's why they put on all them silly airs. (snort)
Ah shure miss them good ol' days.
True, but Freedom did not exist at his time, and he was trying to restore it, however ineffectually. But he was never a traitor.
You ought to have someone tell you about life in America, during WWII. About blackouts, so Japanese planes and boats wouldn't have it easy, to find the cities on the coast. About the Japanese firing, on the west coast in California and Oregon. About the Japanese sending bombs, in balloons, over America and Canada. About rationing rubber, gasoline, nylon, foodstuffs. People's freedoms were limited, for good reasons.
Let me ask you some questions:
1. If you were drafted next month, what would you do? (Before you criticize so many others, you might reflect on what you would REALLY do, for and about your country.)
2. If later events prove you wrong, will you admit it?
If you weren't an ignorant jackass, you'd know that that's BS. The fact is, wild accusations are all you have. You've said that anyone who doesn't want to search American homes one by one should be immediately shot, and that anyone who disagrees is a traitor. Somehow I doubt the real American people, even the sheep, would "stand with" your fictitious idea of the American people. For that matter, I suspect that even though I've called him amoral and said various other unpleasant things about him, the actual President Bush would agree with me a lot more than with you, as would any real American.
You're nothing but a nutcase.
Acutally if we stopped supporting most of it with our foreign aid, the rest of the world would be very little threat to us, even the terrorists. (I can explain if you like.)
...but we probably wouldn't be allowed to live in an isolated armed communtiy within the US.
When the time comes to do this, you don't ask permission. The trick is to be armed enough, to be no threat to anyone else (unless threatened) and to have something the rest of the world wants. (Waco is not the example to follow.)
Hank
This seems to be the conclusion of every thread that Corny participates in. Sorry I was too late to join in the fun this time. As comic relief, he's a scream.
Someone is against the American people, but its not the one who wishes to protect their right to free speech, it is the one who want's to shut them up.
Hank
:)
Oh my goodness! You're right! I'm so wrong because I'm 19. I agree with you now. Oh, wait, I'm still 19. Sorry about that, but you're wrong now. What about the old folks who agreed with me (back before I switched sides). Are they right now? If they're right, should I agree with them, or will that make them wrong again? My head hurts.
Maybe you could just address the issues.
You ought to have someone tell you about life in America, during WWII. About blackouts, so Japanese planes and boats wouldn't have it easy, to find the cities on the coast. About the Japanese firing, on the west coast in California and Oregon. About the Japanese sending bombs, in balloons, over America and Canada. About rationing rubber, gasoline, nylon, foodstuffs. People's freedoms were limited, for good reasons.
Would you like all of that stuff again?
1. If you were drafted next month, what would you do?
Drafted for what? We're about to get bin Laden.
2. If later events prove you wrong, will you admit it?
Wrong about what?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.