Skip to comments.
Moon mining: want to invest in the final frontier?
Reuters ^
| 21 NOV 2001 23:30
| Jeremy Smith
Posted on 11/21/2001 8:23:23 PM PST by CommiesOut
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: madrussian; malarski; Askel5; GROUCHOTWO; Zviadist; kristinn; Free the USA; struwwelpeter...
-
To: CommiesOut
Bump and a bookmark.
To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
It seems like the EARTH FIRST!ers would be jumping all over this.
To: CommiesOut
The real key to lunar mining, Taylor said, was to reduce the cost of sending a craft into space so that its operators could afford to have a vehicle which went up partially empty into space and came back partially empty. I guess it is probably better than if it went up empty into space and came back empty.
5
posted on
11/21/2001 9:25:00 PM PST
by
malarski
To: CommiesOut
"We aren't going to have little men with tin hats holding picks in their hands," he said. "All this exploitation of asteroid material will be robotic and remote."Ahh, come on, have a heart.
6
posted on
11/21/2001 9:34:23 PM PST
by
jmp702
To: malarski
All you need is enough dumb investors. It can go on empty both ways min. 10 years.
If you have balls you tell them: "Empty = fuel savings"!
Then you move to Patagonia.
To: CommiesOut
Are you familiar with Space Studies Institute and Gerard O'Neill, whose untimely death in 1992 set back the private push into mining the moon for materials to build solar energy satellites to beam energy to Earth from space?
O'Neill was the inventor of the mass driver, and coined the term "The High Frontier."
To: jmp702
Didnt the tin man want a brain?
To: CommiesOut
Even if you did it on the dark side of the Moon, I'll guarantee you the e-wakkos would be all over it. And that would be no more silly than their concern about ANWR.
10
posted on
11/23/2001 8:53:01 PM PST
by
Rushian
To: operation clinton cleanup
11
posted on
11/23/2001 9:17:43 PM PST
by
jmp702
To: redrock
I'm a rockthrower from way back.
To: CommiesOut
The real key to lunar mining, Taylor said, was to reduce the cost of sending a craft into space so that its operators could afford to have a vehicle which went up partially empty into space and came back partially empty.Alternatively, we could send a robotically-operated minifactory to the Moon which would manufacture projectile shell casings for shipping metals back to Earth. The shells would be fired from the Moon, using oxygen compression. Such pressurized guns have been tested on Earth with velocities that equal lunar escape velocity.
This was the technology I used in my story, Incident at Clavius Gulch.
13
posted on
11/23/2001 9:35:34 PM PST
by
JoeSchem
To: nunya bidness
Me too!!!
But.....it really wouldn't be beyond the ability of private business to do this....
But would the government allow it to happen???
After all...if PRIVATE individuals start moving into space...could the government still CONTROL them???
(After all...to them losing voters is a 'bad thing')
redrock
14
posted on
11/24/2001 4:52:04 AM PST
by
redrock
To: CommiesOut
To back up their claims, they cite a famous sale of Russian lunar samples held at a New York Sotheby's auction in 1993, where a pebble of moon rock weighing less than one carat fetched an astounding $442,000, or $2,200 a milligram. According to Applied Space Resources (ASR), a moon mission costing less than $100 million could return a quantity of lunar material with enough demand in the marketplace to make the return on investment attractive to financial backers. But if they returned a large quantity, it wouldn't be so rare and valuable, would it?
To: redrock
In the late 60's and early 70's deep sea mining was the next frontier and I am still waiting.
16
posted on
11/25/2001 3:02:07 AM PST
by
monocle
To: CommiesOut
"The treaty stipulated that any wealth obtained from the moon by any space-faring nation was to be distributed to all the people of the world."
The "have-nots" trying to run the lives of the "haves" again.
17
posted on
11/25/2001 3:10:43 AM PST
by
Stingray
To: Stingray
The "have-nots" trying to run the lives of the "haves" again. A good working definition of the U.N. in general.
To: Stingray

Two Chinese women walk past a billboard featuring a picture of the space shuttle, on a Beijing street Friday, Nov. 23, 2001. China on Thursday announced that it would send men into space by 2005, and that plans for a manned mission to the moon are under way. The billboard promotes a Beijing newspaper called Star Daily. (AP Photo/Greg Baker) |
To: monocle
In the late 60's and early 70's deep sea mining was the next frontier and I am still waiting. You missed it.
Too much government involvement to make it profitable. ;^)
20
posted on
11/25/2001 5:58:38 AM PST
by
brityank
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson