Posted on 11/19/2001 8:16:31 AM PST by SocialMeltdown
Wonder how he got AIDS in the first place........
For an If/then to result as they want, both the argument must be correct, and the "If" qualification must be satisfied.
Well, if he wasn't a fag he probably wouldn't be dying in the first place. How's that for relavence?
That's special. They must not be terribly familiar with what Christ is about or about what submitting to the "world" means. Ah, to be able to serve two masters.
No debate is needed, and only Satan proclaims the need for a debate here. Their role is simple: Repent from their sin, leave the homosexual lifestyle and be forgiven.
OR, keep on with your New Butt Order® (NBO) ways and face the consequences. One of which ought to be banishment from folks who "choose" the correct path of living.
Unfortunately, it appears that He isn't:
Romans 1:24-27 (NKJV)
24 Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, 25 who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen. 26 For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. 27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.
1 Corinthians 6:9-11 (NKJV)
9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, 10 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you. But you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God.
Jude 7 (NKJV)
7 as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities around them in a similar manner to these, having given themselves over to sexual immorality and gone after strange flesh, are set forth as an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.
Serving God is not about disobeying but about obeying.
This is just more apostasy.
Galatians 6:7 Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, this he will also reap.
Reference: The Overhauling of Straight America:
"...While public opinion is one primary source of mainstream values, religious authority is the other. When conservative churches condemn gays, there are only two things we can do to confound the homophobia of true believers. First, we can use talk to muddy the moral waters. This means publicizing support for gays by more moderate churches, raising theological objections of our own about conservative interpretations of biblical teachings, and exposing hatred and inconsistency. Second, we can undermine the moral authority of homophobic churches by portraying them as antiquated backwaters, badly out of step with the times and with the latest findings of psychology. Against the mighty pull of institutional Religion one must set the mightier draw of Science and Public Opinion (the shield and word of that accursed secular humanism). Such an unholy alliance has worked well against churches before, on such topics as divorce and abortion. With enough open talk about the prevalence and acceptability of homosexuality, that alliance can work again here..." [Emphasis added]
*Homosexual Agenda bump... (Free Republic Bump List Register)
patent
Odd, I thought the "old-catholics" tended to be the ones who broke away declaring Vatican II to be too liberal. I can only assume they failed to copyright the term and now anyone can use it.
Sounds as if they're taking Sola Scriptura to its natural conclusions. Bet they can quote a ton of Scripture, stripped of all traditional meaning and intent, to support their position (no pun intended).
Initially they broke away in protest of Papal infallibility. They also added a claim to be a return to Catholic Tradition. All of our schismatics claim that though. They very quickly deviated substantially from that tradition, and today are quite the odd collection, to the extent they still exist. As to copyrighting terms, they actually try very hard to portray themselves as being simply Catholic, and frequently wind up deceiving people into believing that they are in union with the Pope. We have that problem quite a bit today too....an ex-Catholic woman was ordained a "priest" by a schismatic group of so called "old-catholics."Odd, I thought the "old-catholics" tended to be the ones who broke away declaring Vatican II to be too liberal. I can only assume they failed to copyright the term and now anyone can use it.
patent +AMDG
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.