Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judges release Congressional redistricting plan (Texas--Republicans HOSED)
Austin American Statesman ^ | November 14, 2001 | Laylan Copelin

Posted on 11/16/2001 1:08:07 PM PST by Dog Gone

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: Dog Gone; deport; KQQL; Gorest Gump; Torie; Tall_Texan; writmeister
This map must be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. We should get 6-8 new seats in Texas. Despite gains in Michigan and Pennsylvania, Republicans certainly do not own the House of Representatives, since the Rats are going to clean up in Georgia and North Carolina. Also, I'm not confident that Republicans are going to be able to overcome a surge in the Hispanic and black vote (95% of whom will vote Rat as usual) that will surely be caused by the candidacies of Tony Sanchez and Ron Kirk. Plus, Sanchez is going to use the Dork Warner model - run as a "conservative" and use a vast personal fortune to monopolize the airwaves. Regardless of Texas' decided Republican tilt in recent years, the GOP really does have its work cut out for it.
41 posted on 11/16/2001 1:13:32 PM PST by Holden Magroin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever; Gracey; Carol-HuTex
FYImput?
42 posted on 11/16/2001 1:13:33 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Why don't they stick to one-man-one vote deal and stop the racial gerrymandering?
43 posted on 11/16/2001 1:13:35 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I think Chet Edwards is toast. He had a '9' (out of 100) rating from the American Conservative Union, (Bernie Sanders actually beat him) and that point is going to be pounded home again and again. He wins 'cuz he is "good for Fort Hood" but gee, who wouldn't look out after the #1 employer in the state of Texas. Stick a fork in Chet....
44 posted on 11/16/2001 1:13:41 PM PST by centexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Holden Magroin
I doubt Kirk has a chance of surviving the Democrat primary. I think it will be Morales or Bentsen. We had better hope that it's that loser Bentsen, because if Sanchez and Morales are on the ticket for the general election, it will boost hispanic turnout.

One interesting development is that hispanics have an excellent shot at helping to elect the next mayor of Houston on December 1. Although he's Cuban, Orlando Sanchez is staunch conservative and is drawing most of the hispanic support.

The trick will be getting them to continue to vote for conservatives in 2002.

45 posted on 11/16/2001 1:13:42 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I doubt Kirk has a chance of surviving the Democrat primary. I think it will be Morales or Bentsen. We had better hope that it's that loser Bentsen, because if Sanchez and Morales are on the ticket for the general election, it will boost hispanic turnout.

Right. Bentsen would lose, but Morales is also damaged goods. He can brag about the tobacco settlement, but he'll have to explain to the voters why his trial lawyer buddies got all the dough. Still, Hispanics would vote for him. I still wish they had put Bonilla on the ticket.

One interesting development is that hispanics have an excellent shot at helping to elect the next mayor of Houston on December 1. Although he's Cuban, Orlando Sanchez is staunch conservative and is drawing most of the hispanic support. The trick will be getting them to continue to vote for conservatives in 2002.

Wrong. The trick is to keep them from finding out that Sanchez is Cuban. Mexicans hate Cubans.

46 posted on 11/16/2001 1:13:53 PM PST by Holden Magroin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Holden Magroin
Good grief. Hispanics aren't retards.

Sanchez received 60% of the hispanic vote in a three-man race last week. His features, including blue eyes (I think), are European. He's not a stranger to Houston politics having served six years on the very important and prominent City Council.

I'm sure there are some who will vote for him thinking he must have strong ties to Mexico because of his last name, but there is a certain percentage of voters who are idiots.

I hope you aren't arguing that the 60% who voted for the conservative Sanchez are idiots, while the remainder who voted liberal are intelligent.

47 posted on 11/16/2001 1:15:34 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
His features, including blue eyes (I think), are European.

I think Tony Sanchez has blue eyes, too. Hopefully, Hispanics will be turned off by his not-so-scintillating riches-to-riches story. But I wouldn't count on it.

I'm sure there are some who will vote for him thinking he must have strong ties to Mexico because of his last name, but there is a certain percentage of voters who are idiots.

An ethnic group that usually gives 75% of its vote to Democrats doesn't just suddenly give 60% of its vote to a Republican. When Brown starts to tell Hispanics that Orlando Sanchez is Cuban and opposes racial quotas, Sanchez will start to slip.

48 posted on 11/16/2001 1:17:21 PM PST by Holden Magroin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
OK, sometimes this takes decades to fix. How do the new districts for the Texas House and Texas State Senate look. Has anyone analized this yet?
49 posted on 11/17/2001 9:19:59 AM PST by Norwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Norwell
They are still being argued in court. But here's an update from today's Houston Chronicle:

Feds turn down state House map

Justice Department says plan for redistricting hurts Hispanics

By R.G. RATCLIFFE
Copyright 2001 Houston Chronicle Austin Bureau

AUSTIN -- The U.S. Justice Department Friday rejected the state House redistricting plan adopted by the Legislative Redistricting Board, saying the plan violates the voting rights of Hispanics in South and West Texas.

Assistant U.S. Attorney General Ralph F. Boyd Jr. advised the state of the decision in a letter to the Texas Secretary of State's Office.

The House plan was adopted 3-2 in July by the Legislative Redistricting Board, five top state officials charged with drawing new maps for the state Senate and House of Representatives after the Legislature failed to do so.

One of the board members, Texas Attorney General John Cornyn, drew the original map. Two other members, Comptroller Carole Keeton Rylander and Land Commissioner David Dewhurst, amended it before the trio voted it into law. All three are Republicans.

The other two LRB members, House Speaker Pete Laney, a Democrat, and Lt. Gov. Bill Ratliff, a Republican, voted against the plan for redrawing the state's 150 House districts.

The LRB map would have given Republicans substantial control of the Texas House after the 2002 election. Democrats now hold a 78-72 majority.

In its session this year, the House approved a map for its own redistricting, but the plan never was voted on by the state Senate.

The Justice Department rejection of the LRB map could be significant to the considerations of a three-judge federal court panel now reviewing the House map. The department's action means there now is no official state plan before the court, increasing the likelihood that the judges will draw their own.

In a congressional redistricting case decided earlier this week, the federal court showed it is not inclined to change the political status quo in Texas by judicial fiat. Under that plan, which probably will be used in next year's elections, U.S. representatives likely can be re-elected, even though districts were adjusted to accommodate population growth measured in the 2000 Census. Texas is gaining two seats, bringing the delegation to 32.

The state House map was subject to Justice Department review because Texas falls under the Voting Rights Act. The department previously approved the LRB's plan for the state Senate, which is now under consideration by the three-judge panel.

The department reviews political maps to make sure they do not eliminate minority legislative districts.

Boyd said the plan violates minority voting rights by eliminating Hispanic districts in Bexar and Cameron counties, as well as in District 35 in South Texas and District 74 in West Texas, without creating offsetting gains elsewhere.

He also said the LRB packed Hispanics into several other districts. He said if those voters had been spread more evenly, at least two South Texas Hispanic districts would not have been lost.

Despite rejection of the map as a whole, Cornyn claimed victory because the Justice Department did not object to the remaining portion of the LRB's House map. He said he plans to propose some changes to the federal court.

"I am pleased that the Department of Justice has approved 98 percent of the House plan," Cornyn said. "I am confident that the department's letter can be fully addressed with minor alterations to three districts, and I look forward to presenting them to the court next week."

A spokesman for Rylander said she had not yet read the Justice Department letter and did not want to comment. Dewhurst, Ratliff and Laney were traveling and unavailable for comment.

The Mexican-American Legislative Caucus praised the action.

"John Cornyn's map was a disservice to Hispanics throughout the state," said Rep. Pete Gallego, D-Alpine, caucus chairman. "This clears the way for the federal courts to draw a new plan that protects the voting rights of Texas Hispanics in accordance with the law."

Gallego said he was pleased that a Justice Department run by Republicans "did the right thing" by rejecting a map drawn by Texas Republicans.

Nina Perales, a lawyer representing the Mexican-American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, said it is impossible to know how the federal court will react to the ruling.

She said Laney's lawyers will argue that the court should now turn to the plan passed by the House with his support, while Cornyn will argue that simple repairs to the LRB map are all that are needed.

"We're pleased because we're not going to be put into the position of losing districts," Perales said. "Now the question is whether we are going to gain seats."

50 posted on 11/17/2001 12:20:23 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert
Seems we will all be in the same reps district, not divided between 3 anymore. I don't know if that is good or bad, as we share with Odessa and perhaps Lubbock. Oh well.
51 posted on 11/18/2001 12:00:27 AM PST by Yellow Rose of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: deport; Yellow Rose of Texas
BTTT
52 posted on 12/12/2001 10:18:00 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson