What is "Palaeo"conservatism?

My own questions | november 13, 2001 | Me

[Sabramerican]

I've been searching for the Jewish thought-control apparatus for years.

I figure it would raise my success rate with women to 100%.

[gcruse]

How do you think "Jews" comes into the equation?

When all one has is a hammer, everything
looks like a nail.

[JMJ333]

I'm on to them, of course. No one's gonna control MY thoughts...

[gcruse]

We believe that many of the Founding Fathers had very good ideas.

Any questions?

Yes.  Which FF ideas were bad ones?

 

[gcruse]

What's he doing? Feeling for her off switch?

[gcruse]

 Religion does not need to be excluded from public discourse,
but sectarian differences should be left out.

Any questions?

Yes.  What the hell does the above mean?

 

[NovemberCharlie]

It's probably safe to say that Hamilton's idea of an American monarchy was a bad one.

[SusanUSA]

the writing of someone who has confused himself to the point of distraction and is pouring it all out in an overly verbose vanity which, of course, blames others for his confusion.

Here, hear! You said it well. Thank you.

[gcruse]

Well, Thomas Jefferson thought that I was just a harmless Philanthropist.

      Who is "I?"

He also liked public schools. He sympathized with the
French Revolution. George Washington was much better.

        Much better, how?  Did GW not like public schools,
        or the French revolution?

He believed that the accusations against me should be taken
seriously. His ideas are not taught in Jefferson's public schools, are they?

   Who is "me?"   What are you talking about?

[gcruse]

It's probably safe to say that Hamilton's idea
of an American monarchy was a bad one.

Yes, it would, were it true.  President Washington
didn't seem to think it was.
 

               Ironically, Hamilton found himself under constant and often scurrilous attack
               from Republican leadership, from which not even the entreaties of President
               Washington could save him. From the Hamilton Project, University of
               Virginia:

 

                    "Or did he? Many of the accusations against [Hamilton], by virtue of being
                    widely distributed and reported, sank into the consciousness of the
                    public. Enough mud had been thrown at the Treasury Secretary that
                    some of it was bound to stick. The complexities of his economic
                    policies were much more difficult to understand than the charge that he
                    sought to establish an American monarchy and profit in the process.
                    Indeed, the complexities allowed the charge because Hamilton was
                    uninterested in explaining financial intricacies for the common people,
                    and because the Republicans therefore seized the opportunity to define
                    their opponent."

[JMJ333]

I figure with the Jewish thought-control apparatus conspiring against me here at FR, I'd better wrap my head in a microwave beanie. You never can be too careful.

[SusanUSA]

For a topic that's dealing with such relative terms you made a good point here.

I think what unites paleos, however, is the idea of the "old republic" - the devolution of power away from the federal government back down to the states and people. And the destruction or restraining of the "New World Order" - an even higher and more remote level of social and economic control.

[gcruse]

You know damn well what I mean.

No, I honestly don't.  Secular differences
should be left out of public discourse?  What
does that mean?

[gcruse]

I figure with the Jewish thought-control apparatus conspiring
against me here at FR, I'd better wrap my head in a microwave
beanie.

Alcoa long with that.