Posted on 11/07/2001 12:53:25 AM PST by sarcasm
I agree. A lot of things I used to complain about now seem insignificant by comparison.
Check into the history of the Bracero program and the current situation in Germany with their "temporary" workers - there is no one so permanent as a guest-worker. You might also check into the history of "Operation Wetback" - the forcible repatriation of Mexicans who were admitted under a guest-worker program such as you envision.
Do you also plan to sterilize the participants in this program? Do you believe that they will not procreate and give us a crop of anchor children? What would be the cost of educating these children - the taxes that they would pay would not cover the additional cost to the taxpayers. How much would this program cost in TANF benefits?
Does your plan envision employer provided health insurance so that the cost is nor fobbed off on the taxpayers? Is so, would you extent this requirement to the native-born worker? Have you considered the effect of such a program on the average wage of the lowest paid American worker? What would be the cost to the American taxpayers of providing unemployment insurance and welfare payments to this group?
she says that you need to start acting like a normal person, or she'll hafta send you back to jumping for peanuts at the local zoo.
I kept hearing those illegals sneaked into America because they love freedom.
You mean it was all about money?
It always has been. On both sides of the border. For both the mexican worker and the company that hires them. The later being the reason our federal government won't close the border no matter how many terrorists come in. Dollars (profits) trump security of our borders.
WarHawk42
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.