Posted on 11/02/2001 11:59:31 AM PST by Starmaker
Doc
You can mentally masturbate on your own.
I apologize to all residents of Texas that you have "tex" as part of your moniker.
You're more Taliban than Texan.
Have to get up pretty early to fool you, I see. No sirree, can't slip one by you. The CIA could use more sharp tacks like you.
"You don't have the guts to post it yourself?"
I take back the "sharp tack" comment. If you had paid the slightest bit of attention you'd have noticed that Starmaker usually takes the initiative in posting the articles from ToogoodReports.com.
"It's drivel, and your continued attempt at moral equivalence (in this article, you say we're WORSE than the terrorists) between America and radical Islamists is disgusting."
Hmmmm. I don't recall saying America was worse than the terrorists, but consider this: Death toll in America due to terrorism in 2001: 6,000. Death toll in America due to abortion in 2001: 1.5 million. Oh, yeah. We're as pure as the wind-driven snow.
When the forecast calls for spotty drivel, you can be sure sinkspur will be there smack dab in the middle of it. I was merely posing a question; a question you avoided addressing. (Big surprise!) Just be glad I didn't include the examples of how Abe Lincoln targeted civilians in the South during the War of Northern Aggression. Do you honestly believe that comparing terrorist attacks to what we've done to innocent civilians abroad and what we continue to do to our own children is wrong? Unlike you, I expect a little more from a government that claims to be the protector of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
"You're not with us, Lee. You're with the terrorists."
Now who's attempting to impose moral equivalence? To say that I'm not with you is a compliment, sir. You and your group of nationalistic, collectivist, government lackeys do not appeal to me. To say that I'm "with the terrorists" is so utterly absurd that I don't even know where to begin. Whenever war is waged there will be civilian deaths. It's a fact of life. But purposely targeting and killing civilians is immoral no matter how you try to justify it.
Thanks for the clarification on who wrote this 8th grade term paper.
Oh, no. Never. Korea, Vietnam, Panama, Iraq, Haiti, Somalia, Bosnia......
Who's targeting "innocent civilians", jerkweed?
There ARE no "innocent civilians" in Afghanistan. The Taliban hide among the civilians; the civilians thus become targets.
Cry for these monkeys if you want. 90% of Americans don't, won't, and are united in making an example of those who harbor terrorists.
Do you honestly believe that comparing terrorist attacks to what we've done to innocent civilians abroad and what we continue to do to our own children is wrong?
I do. And, there you go again, trying to draw moral equivalence.
Despicable, Shelton. Absolutely despicable.
Could you please reciprocate and clarify who read it to you?
War. W-A-R. Killing the enemy is the objective.
The only problem, in all of those engagements, is that we didn't kill enough of them.
My 3 year old grandson, he gave you an F.
This is very true. I have seen about 3 threads from this clown and never is there a response. You wanna know why? cause Starmaker is trying to rally up trouble here at FR. i say we all make a pact not to respond to ANTI AMERICA threads from now on. If no one responds hopefully these people will go away.
Despicable....absolutely despicable applies to your pathetic comment here, Sinkspur..... Using your twisted logic, undoubtedly OBL and his terrorist thugs could declare they weren't after anybody in the towers other than fedgov employees and properties; that the Pentagon is a military target; and that the heros on Flight 93 stopped the thugs from hitting that military target again.....it's just that 'those dang fedgov people were hiding among civilians"!!! Take that along with the fact that children have NO CHOICE, your argument becomes not only despicable, but stupid and illogical to boot.
..." Cry for these monkeys if you want. 90% of Americans don't, won't, and are united in making an example of those who harbor terrorists"...
Makes sense that 90% of Amerikans don't or won't cry for 'these monkeys' as you call the Afghani innocents.....why should we---we're too damned busy killing our own babies cause their own mothers don't want to 'harbor' them! Even if your statistic of 90% is accurate, it doesn't mean diddly squat--the majority of Amerikans, as I recall, wanted the Pervert to stay in office....and the majority voted the Pervert in office twice!! Sometimes theres no excusing the opinions of Amerikan sheeple!
What's got your shorts all in a wad on comparing anything to anything....according to you, Sinkspur, there are NO innocents. How arrogant. Do you ever wonder if Mohammed says something about "there being no innocents"?
...."Come on, spinky. Show me the money."....
Somehow or other, I get the feeling he'd rather discuss masturbating!!! :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.