Posted on 10/20/2001 10:54:30 AM PDT by ikka
Note as well how this exposes the lie that gay men are just as faithful to their "partner" as hetero men are to their wives.
How is it AOL's fault that gay men are indulging in their mentally deranged behavior and getting sick as a result?
Would this even be a story if a number of straight women had gotten STDs through online hookups?
Uh... how did you arrive at this sweepingly general conclusion?
Because of homosexual activist resistance to closing the homo bath houses that were the main breeding ground for AIDS back when the disease was first documented. And by their attempts recently to reopen them. And by the stories about bug-chasers. And by the stories about homos refusing to use condoms because exposing themselves to the risk of AIDS is considered more 'intimate.' BARF!
We aren't surprised, however. These people are mentally ill after all.
Your talking about two sides of the same coin. Promiscuity among heterosexuals is as unacceptable to a moral society as is homosexuality.
>>>Whom do you propose to penalize because of these idiots? Me?<<<
If you consider denying homosexuals special rights as some sort of penalty, then the answer is yes.
>>>Are you going to use this little news bite as part of your reason that the partners of WTC victims do not deserve aid?<<<
Actually, it was intended to highlight the inherent immorality and perversity of homosexuality.
>>>Then it is only fair that you use heterosexual promiscuity statistics to determine proportionally how much aid heterosexuals get.<<<
No aid for domestic partners. Period. Good enough?
>>>As dear old Ronald would say, "There you go again!" Using the irresponsible acts of a small minority to tar the majority.<<<
I don't believe it is a minority. You begin with a foundation of sexual perversion and everything you build upon it will be corrupt.
>>>Curtailing the rights of one person by statistics involving someone else.<<<
I'm not curtailing anyone's rights. No survivor benefits should be created for bedmates.
>>>Assuming anything a small number of gays do must reflect on gays as a class but taking no particular responsibility for the sins of heterosexuals.<<<
That's because we condemn those sins as well. Just because heteros sin doesn't mean I have to accept your sin as moral.
>>>I mean, perhaps you should address the excesses of the spokesmen for heterosexuals. You know, Larry Flint, Marilyn Cambers, Hugh Hefner. Your leaders.<<<
They are people who promote perversity and who should not recieve any special rights or priveleges.
No survivor benefits for bedmates.
You already have them. Case in point, you can marry any woman you want (family members excluded). ;-)
>>>Sure. And a piece about rape would highlight the inherent immorality and perversity of heterosexuality?<<<
No, there are violent people in both camps. They should be in prison. The parallels arise when one observes how the perversity of homosexuality draws its victims into a downward spiral of perversion. Perversion isn't limited to homosexuals, of course, but they and the NAMBLA types are the only ones harping for acceptance.
The homosexuals who raped and murder Jesse Dirkhising were supposedly in a long term committed relationship and poor Jesse's parents didn't recognize the inherent threat of allowing deviants access to their innocent child. Such a pity, really.
>>>If a gay person does something bad, that proves gay people are bad. If a straight person does something bad, you distance yourself from him.<<<
Actually, your talking about heterosexual perverts. I avoid them as strenously as the homosexual ones.
>>>Of course, you don't mean that. I'm sure you really care about the widows involved. What you really mean is "no survivor benefits for bedmates who are not legally married." But you won't give us that right.<<<
Correct. Two people of the same sex cannot marry anymore than pigs can fly. Marriage is between a man and a woman.
>>>Admit it. You want gay people to be irresponsible, because it helps you to treat them as the enemy. If 99% of gays were in monogomous, long-term relationships, it would really upset you, wouldn't it?<<<
Actually, I'd like to see all of them cured of their Same Sex Attraction Disorder so that they can live heality, monogomous, long-term relationships with a person of the opposite sex as God and nature intended them to.
If I hadn't legally been able to marry my wife, it wouldn't have changed a thing about our relationship. What is wrong with homosexuals that it drives them to promiscuity? Simple, they are ill people.
Face it, we will not permit homosexuals to tarnish the moral foundations of this nation, marriage merely being one of them.
People commit crimes for all manner of reasons, including sexual perversion. Since homosexuals already suffer from a sexual perversion, they have an increased risk toward additional perversion than would a normal person.
>>>Homosexuals can't marry in Vermont. They can form civil unions, which are legal secular relationships involving certain rights and responsibilities. <<<
True for now, but not for very much longer.
>>>What is your objection to that? It is not marriage.<<<
Several homosexuals have attempted to use the perverted Vermont "civil union" to force their home states to recognize it as a marriage. That's why I am financially supporting the effort to get protection for marriage amended to the Constitution. And we will prevail.
>>>Ah, yes, but you would not want to learn they were mostly living healthy, monogomous, long-term relationships with a person of the same sex, as their nature intended them to.<<<
Nature did not intend the penis to enter the human rectum. Damage is done everytime. AIDS, a variety of STD's, and even increased instances of anal cancer result. Nature's send a message.
Homosexual is neither normal nor natural.
>>>Again, you want people to be happy following your life plan, certainly not their own.<<<
The plan comes from God and nature.
Homosexuality is not the moral equivalent of heterosexuality. We will not permit it to become the legal equivalent either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.