It Could Be St. Luke's Body, After All.

EWTN ^ | 10/18/01

[marshmallow]

Interesting, but they make no mention of anthrax.

Clearly some sort of coverup is underway.

[Marc Poor]

Although there were no signs of Anthrax, the skeleton was treated with Cipro just as a precaution.

[randita]

It is interesting. I don't know how it could be proven inconclusively that the body was St. Luke,'s, but from this article, one can surmise that the body in question COULD be St. Luke's--doesn't rule it out.

[okie_tech]

But how do they explain the tooth if there's no head?

[Lonman219]

What political significance does this have???????????

[sparkomatic]

ref #6
Good point. That got by me completely.

[A. Pole]

But how do they explain the tooth if there's no head?

It might mean tha the skull was removed (the one in Prague) after the tooth fell out.

[Romulus]

Did the body have a paintbrush in hand?

[Aggie Mama]

ROFLMAO. I've begun to look forward to these "where's waldo" pictures. =)

[Texaggie79]

I've seen em all. I submitted a few of mine to the site. I don't know if he'll post em.

[Texaggie79]

You can ping me to these, just don't expect a reaction form me, since I already seen em :-P

[Texaggie79]

For your info, there are a few more Aggies in this world than just me.